Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hes on a mission to piss everyone off when hes just walked in, that never plays out well.

 

I'm all for calling out and getting rid of the wasters in a business but you cant just go full on scorched earth early days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wiseman said:

If it came out Ashworth was already working for them,  there would be massive consequences. They would be doing absolutely everything in their power to hide him already assisting them and not make it look like it's happening.

 

Of course he's not working for them. They just want us to think he might be so that we reduce our compensation demands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wiseman said:

If it came out Ashworth was already working for them,  there would be massive consequences. They would be doing absolutely everything in their power to hide him already assisting them and not make it look like it's happening.

 

Of course he's not working for them. They just want us to think he might be so that we reduce our compensation demands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Interpolic said:

Prick. 

 

 


Feels like a soft lay off, get as many people to quit before you start having to pay redundancy. 
 

This coupled with the taxpayer  paid stadium nonsense is more indicative of an Ashley than a Roman. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, midds said:

Riddled with laziness - on and off the field. Time for them to put in the hours they get paid for, the workshy, sweat-dodging cunts. Time to put some shoulders to the wheel and start making the bosses richer

 

Should pull their socks up, roll up their sleeves and get back to basics, as a well-known Man U legend likes to say.  To be brutally honest.  Well, y'know . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beth said:

Seriously? WFH is the biggest skive known to man and a hangover from the covid era.

Utter tosh. I'm an academic and have researched extensively on this. Such a shortsighted view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, as someone who can work from home I'm massively more productive there. Even before the pandemic I'd ask to work from home if I had a pressing deadline coming so I could avoid distractions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LionOfGosforth said:

Worked from home since 2008, love it, miles more productive and would never want to go back to commuting, traffic, parking hassles and lost productivity all while getting aggravated and spending more. What a load of shite :lol:

Exactly. When I worked in London I sometimes had to travel in just for a 15 minute meeting. Cost a fortune as well as a near 4-hour round commute. Glad things have moved on since then but seemingly not at Manure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chris_R said:

I've got a conspiracy theory, if you'll indulge me...

 

Man U are leaking they want Southgate, but they don't. Because nobody rational would. It's to make us think Ashworth is already working for them because of their time with England, so therefore we might as well just accept £2m or whatever lowball number it is today. 

 

This rumour is just to drive down the compo.

 

Nah he's just got no football acumen, so is dazzled by Southgate's semi finals/final as England manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gdm said:

auld Jim is a great laugh

 

 

 

He'd find that hard to enforce from a legal point of view, wouldn't he? It may be in people's original contracts but if they've been doing it for years now it'll sort of be an official change in "psychological contract" that both parties have agreed and accepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Beth said:

Seriously? WFH is the biggest skive known to man and a hangover from the covid era.

What a brain fart.

 

WFH / Hybrid is fantastic. Just a small number of benefits we've seen at work.

  • Staff retention is massively improved.
  • Staff flexibility around working patterns massively improves (because they're not travelling).
  • Productivity is no different, if not slightly better.
  • Staff are much happier.

 

Spending 1-2 hours per day commuting isn't an enjoyable experience. Mornings and evenings are now spent getting fresh air or other forms of exercise. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Nucasol said:

Nothing beats losing four hours of efficient work at home to spend it sat or stood on sweatbox trains doing nothing so some no nowt prick can have you in the office. Boomers gonna boom.

And don’t forget the super important meetings where 95% of the content bears no relevance to your work. Dat presenteeism 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WFH is shit man. N-Os very own HR expert said so. 

Apparently blokes sit at home scratching their ring pieces and sniffing their fingers whilst the lasses sit in their dressing gowns watching MAFS-AUS and crying 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair I think there are arguments for and against working from home if you have the debate in good faith. The issue is the coercion: it’s literally old fashioned. Businesses who insist on it won’t attract talent in the long run. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Theregulars said:

To be fair I think there are arguments for and against working from home if you have the debate in good faith. The issue is the coercion: it’s literally old fashioned. Businesses who insist on it won’t attract talent in the long run. 

Hence why Manky Jim appears the out of touch Brexit-ERG-Conservative masters and slaves shitbag that he is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...