Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

If you have to ask this, you've not been paying enough attention to have an opinion. 


So what’s the reason? All people say is “Because his attitude stinks / performances crap”. 
 

Like, so are 90% of rest of the team? Yet some experienced guys such as Martinez get a free pass for a stinky performance after stinky performance. 
 

Get the reason to probably wanting to move him on as he’s getting to last window to get a fee and Garnacho is the future, but the way the fans are lapping up the Amorim stance is weird. Been the same for many many more players before Rashford when a manager has taken a stance and nothing has changed :D 

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, The Fountain said:

Yes I've said similar earlier. Is the Man Utd squad worse than the ones Howe and Emery took over?

Not even close to it. 

 

This is a great point and will used when anyone says give him time to me going forwards 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bobbydazzla said:


I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again

 

xG is for blokes who always go home alone after a night out and have a tug in their bedroom at their mams house whilst consoling themselves by thinking of all the lasses they believe they could have shagged 

 

 

 

 

Christ, Bobby man!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bobbydazzla said:


I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again

 

xG is for blokes who always go home alone after a night out and have a tug in their bedroom at their mams house whilst consoling themselves by thinking of all the lasses they believe they could have shagged 

 

 

 

 

Explains why I love xG so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky News has learnt that the Premier League club plans to inform the Manchester United Foundation that it intends to curb the benefits it provides - which totalled close to £1m last year - from 2025 onwards.


Sources close to the situation said a substantial element of the support given to the Foundation by the club would be axed, although Old Trafford insiders insisted on Sunday that it would still provide "significant" support to the charitable wing

 

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/manchester-united-foundation-among-targets-of-ratcliffe-costs-purge-13281101

 

 

Edited by Ronson333

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ronson333 said:

Sky News has learnt that the Premier League club plans to inform the Manchester United Foundation that it intends to curb the benefits it provides - which totalled close to £1m last year - from 2025 onwards.


Sources close to the situation said a substantial element of the support given to the Foundation by the club would be axed, although Old Trafford insiders insisted on Sunday that it would still provide "significant" support to the charitable wing

 

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/manchester-united-foundation-among-targets-of-ratcliffe-costs-purge-13281101

 

 

 

 

A lean mean losing machine

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Ronson333 said:

Sky News has learnt that the Premier League club plans to inform the Manchester United Foundation that it intends to curb the benefits it provides - which totalled close to £1m last year - from 2025 onwards.


Sources close to the situation said a substantial element of the support given to the Foundation by the club would be axed, although Old Trafford insiders insisted on Sunday that it would still provide "significant" support to the charitable wing

 

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/manchester-united-foundation-among-targets-of-ratcliffe-costs-purge-13281101

 

 

 


not even Ashley did that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...