Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

McClaren will get the job as soon as he walks into the interview with the arse cut out of his pants for a visual metaphor.

 

We're his best chance of another high profile job - he'll say/do whatever he needs to in order to get the job.

 

The mediocrity will continue and it will be as ever thus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

 

What I mean is, why do we assume that he'll do whatever Ashley says just to get/stay in the job when he's already turned down the job once when the conditions didn't suit him? I get that he's unexciting and all that (although even then, he's probably far too good for the shithole that is NUFC right now), but is there any reason to label him an Ashley sycophant other than the fact that he's English?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they had any sense they'd get Mc and V with Viera as assistant and then take over a couple of years down the road. Best of both worlds. Leave no space for Charverstien.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking Luke Edwards man.

 

http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/family-guy-the-quest-for-stuff/images/4/4e/Buzz.png/revision/latest?cb=20140419143452

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

 

What I mean is, why do we assume that he'll do whatever Ashley says just to get/stay in the job when he's already turned down the job once when the conditions didn't suit him? I get that he's unexciting and all that (although even then, he's probably far too good for the shithole that is NUFC right now), but is there any reason to label him an Ashley sycophant other than the fact that he's English?

This is the man that was pretending to have a Dutch accent and er how you say in English conform like a spineless cunt after he got off the plane. He'll be speaking mercenary borrow boy bullshit within minutes of getting the job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

 

What I mean is, why do we assume that he'll do whatever Ashley says just to get/stay in the job when he's already turned down the job once when the conditions didn't suit him? I get that he's unexciting and all that (although even then, he's probably far too good for the shithole that is NUFC right now), but is there any reason to label him an Ashley sycophant other than the fact that he's English?

This is the man that was pretending to have a Dutch accent and er how you say in English conform like a spineless cunt after he got off the plane. He'll be speaking mercenary borrow boy bullshit within minutes of getting the job.

 

Still can't figure out how he could possibly have thought that was a good idea :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

 

What I mean is, why do we assume that he'll do whatever Ashley says just to get/stay in the job when he's already turned down the job once when the conditions didn't suit him? I get that he's unexciting and all that (although even then, he's probably far too good for the shithole that is NUFC right now), but is there any reason to label him an Ashley sycophant other than the fact that he's English?

This is the man that was pretending to have a Dutch accent and er how you say in English conform like a spineless cunt after he got off the plane. He'll be speaking mercenary borrow boy bullshit within minutes of getting the job.

 

Still can't figure out how he could possibly have thought that was a good idea :lol:

 

Maybe he lost a bet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

 

What I mean is, why do we assume that he'll do whatever Ashley says just to get/stay in the job when he's already turned down the job once when the conditions didn't suit him? I get that he's unexciting and all that (although even then, he's probably far too good for the shithole that is NUFC right now), but is there any reason to label him an Ashley sycophant other than the fact that he's English?

This is the man that was pretending to have a Dutch accent and er how you say in English conform like a spineless c*** after he got off the plane. He'll be speaking mercenary borrow boy bullshit within minutes of getting the job.

 

Still can't figure out how he could possibly have thought that was a good idea :lol:

 

Maybe he lost a bet.

 

So awful to watch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

 

What I mean is, why do we assume that he'll do whatever Ashley says just to get/stay in the job when he's already turned down the job once when the conditions didn't suit him? I get that he's unexciting and all that (although even then, he's probably far too good for the shithole that is NUFC right now), but is there any reason to label him an Ashley sycophant other than the fact that he's English?

 

Well let's hold off until we see which one ends up the job, McClaren or Vieira. I guess you'll have your answer. This is the spineless piece of shit who got sacked by a Championship club BTW, after failing to get them promoted two seasons in a row.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we really were interested in Vieira but thought because he's inexperienced he'll jump at a chance to manage a big club without having control over signings? In reality it's likely that Vieira would be interested in the job, but not if the job refers to the Ashley blowjob perfected by Pardew and Carver which MCClaren would happily kneel down for.

 

To be honest, it's probably a bit unfair to McClaren that we've already labeled him as a sycophant on Pardew and Carver's level when he's already turned down the job once :lol:

 

He didn't turn it down, he was just hedging his bets. If Derby had got promoted he'd have stayed, plus he would have been fearful of getting relegated with us if he did take the job with 3 games to go.

 

Right, so for those reasons, he turned it down.

 

Like I said, hedging his bets. Otherwise why is he still in the frame for the job now? If you believe the press speculation, it seems he's still going to be interviewed for the job this week, as is Vieira, although I find that one more unlikely myself.

 

What I mean is, why do we assume that he'll do whatever Ashley says just to get/stay in the job when he's already turned down the job once when the conditions didn't suit him? I get that he's unexciting and all that (although even then, he's probably far too good for the shithole that is NUFC right now), but is there any reason to label him an Ashley sycophant other than the fact that he's English?

 

Well let's hold off until we see which one ends up the job, McClaren or Vieira. I guess you'll have your answer. This is the spineless piece of shit who got sacked by a Championship club BTW, after failing to get them promoted two seasons in a row.

 

Again, I don't deny that he's unexciting but we have no evidence for spineless. Plenty of bad managers with firm, robust spines out there. (Big Sam, Roy Keane etc.)

 

Also it's all moot because we're appointing Carver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...