Deuce Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 I don't think we have the luxury of labeling him a "sell at all costs" player just because we don't like him, which is to say, if the price isn't right, he stays. He's clearly talented even if his attitude is shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 He seems to be sought after by other clubs and we are not in a position where we have to sell plus he is on a long contract. That means we can name our price and if other clubs don't like it then he stays. They can all afford it anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Anonymous a lot of the time with a great eye for goal. I just don't like this lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 We know. Thanks for the weekly reminder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 I want him gone, his attitude stinks. Don't need characters like that in the squad. Why single Wijnaldum out alone for this though?, our whole squad were bottlers, if some of the others have redemption in them, why not Gini? For what it's worth I think he'll be sold for most of what we paid for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 I want him gone, his attitude stinks. Don't need characters like that in the squad. Why single Wijnaldum out alone for this though?, our whole squad were bottlers, if some of the others have redemption in them, why not Gini? For what it's worth I think he'll be sold for most of what we paid for him. He was the worst Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 Quite the downgrade. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 Quite the downgrade. £20m and it's a deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 NUFC 360 @NUFC360 29m29 minutes ago #NUFC have placed a £30m price tag on Gini Wijnaldum, according to @DiMarzio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 NUFC 360 @NUFC360 29m29 minutes ago #NUFC have placed a £30m price tag on Gini Wijnaldum, according to @DiMarzio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 I wouldn't really surprised, paid 15m for him and he scored in double figures in his first PL season. With that said you'd have to be nuts to pay that, but that's probably the point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 My gut feeling is that his terrible attitude is simply from walking into a poisonous atmosphere after a terrible f***ing season for the club before, it never corrected itself (until Rafa), I think if he sat down with the club and bought into the direction it wants to go, he could be the main man. Did PSV not have a half time presentation to him mid season with the fans thanking him for all his efforts before? That kinda stuff doesn't happen to genuine bad eggs. Could be a massive mistake selling the lad (if we don't have to) Gotta agree, it's as debatable as the Mitrovic divide in support. First season either leaves or is given another chance under better direction as you put so well above. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Twatter full of rumours he's off to Roma. We should at least break even on him IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Twatter full of rumours he's off to Roma. We should at least break even on him IMO. Didn't roma sell Pjanic to fund a replacement for the injured Rudiger. We shouldn't sell cheaply. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Twatter full of rumours he's off to Roma. We should at least break even on him IMO. Didn't roma sell Pjanic to fund a replacement for the injured Rudiger. We shouldn't sell cheaply. We won't. Despite the fact he's gone missing for a lot of the season, there's clearly a very good player in there. I think he'd have looked twice the player next season under Rafa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Twatter full of rumours he's off to Roma. We should at least break even on him IMO. Didn't roma sell Pjanic to fund a replacement for the injured Rudiger. We shouldn't sell cheaply. We won't. Despite the fact he's gone missing for a lot of the season, there's clearly a very good player in there. I think he'd have looked twice the player next season under Rafa. Agree but prepare for pelters him and Sissoko are this forums pet hates Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Doubt a manager can instill heart and courage, he is a little fooking shitehawk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Twatter full of rumours he's off to Roma. We should at least break even on him IMO. Didn't roma sell Pjanic to fund a replacement for the injured Rudiger. We shouldn't sell cheaply. We won't. Despite the fact he's gone missing for a lot of the season, there's clearly a very good player in there. I think he'd have looked twice the player next season under Rafa. Agree but prepare for pelters him and Sissoko are this forums pet hates That's fair enough from a fans POV, it's what you would expect, but I try and look at it from Rafa's perspective and he won't want to lose a quality player unless we get well compensated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 Charnley will panic and try to sell him for five jam jars but Rafa will send him home early with 50p for a mix up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leek Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 They sold Pjanic for £25mill, doubt theyd intend to spend all that on Wijnaldum. Reckon he'd probably look a good player at a good team though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 As with Sissoko, if he feels he's as good as he thinks (wasn't there a quote a week or so back where he was boasting about his stats?), then he can't moan at us for pricing him out of a move if we are holding out for £30m. Another one where if he stays should boss the division and if he leaves, meh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 We'll settle for 20 million, probably 30 million is are start point for negotiations and we'll drop down, if someone meets us at 20 million we'll sell I'm sure, if not, see ya. Despite the stick he gets, he has a lot of quality and would be a huge asset in that division next season. Financially we are not yet in a position to be bullied, that would change if we do not bounce straight back up of course. I just remember the Austin and QPR situation last year, everyone thought they could get him on the cheap. He only had a year left on his deal and QPR were just relegated, they held out though for a 15 million fee or something. They still got a reasonable fee for him 6 months later with even less time on his contract. The parachute payments give clubs the capacity to hold onto their star players despite relegation, if you can bounce straight back up you can still play hard ball with clubs looking to feast off your carcass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GideonShandy Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Was generally reported that Southampton paid QPR only 4 million for Austin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Was generally reported that Southampton paid QPR only 4 million for Austin. He only had 12 months left on his contract Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
afar Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Was generally reported that Southampton paid QPR only 4 million for Austin. That's still decent money for a player who would have been gone in the summer on a free, Gini have 4 or 5 years left on his deal !! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now