Tsunami Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 No disrespect intended to Stoke, but I'd pick us over Stoke everyday of the week and I'd be pretty pissed off if my current club said you can go to Stoke but not Newcastle. Of course, if Spurs come in I'd go there instead. In fact if I was left with only going to Stoke I'd sit on the WBA bench and go to Spurs in the summer for a knock down fee. That reads pretty harsh on Stoke but I could easily see him playing up after a year or two there agitating for a move. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 No disrespect intended to Stoke, but I'd pick us over Stoke everyday of the week and I'd be pretty pissed off if my current club said you can go to Stoke but not Newcastle. Of course, if Spurs come in I'd go there instead. In fact if I was left with only going to Stoke I'd sit on the WBA bench and go to Spurs in the summer for a knock down fee. That reads pretty harsh on Stoke but I could easily see him playing up after a year or two there agitating for a move. I'm not sure that matters much any more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 This whole thing is a wet dream for sky Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 No disrespect intended to Stoke, but I'd pick us over Stoke everyday of the week and I'd be pretty p*ssed off if my current club said you can go to Stoke but not Newcastle. Of course, if Spurs come in I'd go there instead. In fact if I was left with only going to Stoke I'd sit on the WBA bench and go to Spurs in the summer for a knock down fee. That reads pretty harsh on Stoke but I could easily see him playing up after a year or two there agitating for a move. I'm not sure that matters much any more. It could cost his club 15 Million come the summer if he stays at WBA. I appreciate that's a drop in the ocean should he score the goals to keep us up and send WBA down but, if that happens WBA need to turn turbo shit and for either Sunderland or Norwich to put in some great performances. We should improve whether we get Berahino or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 He's already slagged off the chairman in public and said he'd never play for the club again, last time. I don't think they're arsed at this point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Spurs will snap him up tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 No disrespect intended to Stoke, but I'd pick us over Stoke everyday of the week and I'd be pretty pissed off if my current club said you can go to Stoke but not Newcastle. Of course, if Spurs come in I'd go there instead. In fact if I was left with only going to Stoke I'd sit on the WBA bench and go to Spurs in the summer for a knock down fee. That reads pretty harsh on Stoke but I could easily see him playing up after a year or two there agitating for a move. How come? He won't have to live in Stoke, it's only 40 mins up the road from where he is now. Other than the odd work commitment it'd probably be like he's not got owt to do with Stoke (the city). He'd be in a better team (than West Brom) with more exciting players and at a club that is definitely moving forwards/up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Spurs will snap him up tomorrow. I don't think they are interested anymore tbh, there's been nothing since the summer. However i don't think we'll get him either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiedean Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 The thing is how is selling him to us going to put WBA into possible relegation trouble?. They aren't even playing the lad so they aren't weakening their first 11 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 The thing is how is selling him to us going to put WBA into possible relegation trouble?. They aren't even playing the lad so they aren't weakening their first 11 It strengthens us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 If they just accepted this afternoon they would/could have had 20 odd million quid to splash on deadline day to strengthen their shite squad. Seems stupid from their point of view not to have accepted it once they got the fee up a bit first (I assume our first offer was like £6m) Could have got 3-4 decent players for that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Banaloona Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Theres more to this than "fake" bid etc etc. Its obvious they have some positive vibes from Berahino's camp. Pity Peace is a complete C-U-N-T Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 No disrespect intended to Stoke, but I'd pick us over Stoke everyday of the week and I'd be pretty pissed off if my current club said you can go to Stoke but not Newcastle. Of course, if Spurs come in I'd go there instead. In fact if I was left with only going to Stoke I'd sit on the WBA bench and go to Spurs in the summer for a knock down fee. That reads pretty harsh on Stoke but I could easily see him playing up after a year or two there agitating for a move. How come? He won't have to live in Stoke, it's only 40 mins up the road from where he is now. Other than the odd work commitment it'd probably be like he's not got owt to do with Stoke (the city). He'd be in a better team (than West Brom) with more exciting players and at a club that is definitely moving forwards/up I don't think being close to West Brom is necessarily a selling point TBH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 No disrespect intended to Stoke, but I'd pick us over Stoke everyday of the week and I'd be pretty pissed off if my current club said you can go to Stoke but not Newcastle. Of course, if Spurs come in I'd go there instead. In fact if I was left with only going to Stoke I'd sit on the WBA bench and go to Spurs in the summer for a knock down fee. That reads pretty harsh on Stoke but I could easily see him playing up after a year or two there agitating for a move. How come? He won't have to live in Stoke, it's only 40 mins up the road from where he is now. Other than the odd work commitment it'd probably be like he's not got owt to do with Stoke (the city). He'd be in a better team (than West Brom) with more exciting players and at a club that is definitely moving forwards/up I don't think being close to West Brom is necessarily a selling point TBH. True Maybe for him if he's settled or whatever (which he apparently isnt actually so never mind) edit: lived there (Birmingham) all his life. hmm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 If they just accepted this afternoon they would/could have had 20 odd million quid to splash on deadline day to strengthen their s**** squad. Seems stupid from their point of view not to have accepted it once they got the fee up a bit first (I assume our first offer was like £6m) Could have got 3-4 decent players for that Or maybe they will try to get the replacements in before accepting the offer? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 If they just accepted this afternoon they would/could have had 20 odd million quid to splash on deadline day to strengthen their s**** squad. Seems stupid from their point of view not to have accepted it once they got the fee up a bit first (I assume our first offer was like £6m) Could have got 3-4 decent players for that Or maybe they will try to get the replacements in before accepting the offer? They are about to sign Pritchard on loan from Spurs according to Graeme Bailey. Think he's a MF though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Every window there is the one big will he or won't he drama on the last day. Looks like we're involved this time. Sky probably pay each club a fee for it and all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 If they just accepted this afternoon they would/could have had 20 odd million quid to splash on deadline day to strengthen their s**** squad. Seems stupid from their point of view not to have accepted it once they got the fee up a bit first (I assume our first offer was like £6m) Could have got 3-4 decent players for that Or maybe they will try to get the replacements in before accepting the offer? They are about to sign Pritchard on loan from Spurs according to Graeme Bailey. Think he's a MF though. Short arse creative player isn't he, I suspect that ain't going to work out very well for him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Pulls didn't play Gnabry at all, so no idea why they are loaning these types. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Graham Courtney says we have offered £24m cash - from an impeccable source apparently. if thats true what drugs is ashley on? Cake Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Every window there is the one big will he or won't he drama on the last day. Looks like we're involved this time. Sky probably pay each club a fee for it and all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 if thats true what drugs is ashley on? Cake Hey, the nightmare of cake is no laughing matter... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Why the added .2 Million? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Why the added .2 Million? Was wondering that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Why the added .2 Million? Was wondering that It was probably our third bid after £21m and £21.1m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now