Jump to content

Newcastle United transfer rumours in the press


Recommended Posts

If Wilshere really is getting better with his injuries, I'd give him a go. Probably would want a loan with it being permanent based on an certain number of games being played, to make sure he's over it.

 

Played a fair lot for Bournemouth last season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Wilshere is 20M (with a year to go on his contract!!), we should go back for Cairney.

 

I'd take Perez though.

 

NB. This may be in a parallel universe where Mike Ashley doesn't promise one thing and do another.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Wilshere is 20M (with a year to go on his contract!!), we should go back for Cairney.

 

I'd take Perez though.

 

NB. This may be in a parallel universe where Mike Ashley doesn't promise one thing and do another.

 

I think you are confused mind, Perez is the one Arsenal want 20m for not Wilshere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Wilshere is 20M (with a year to go on his contract!!), we should go back for Cairney.

 

I'd take Perez though.

 

NB. This may be in a parallel universe where Mike Ashley doesn't promise one thing and do another.

 

I think you are confused mind, Perez is the one Arsenal want 20m for not Wilshere.

 

The mirror article says they want 17m for Perez and 20m for Wilshere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Wilshere is 20M (with a year to go on his contract!!), we should go back for Cairney.

 

I'd take Perez though.

 

NB. This may be in a parallel universe where Mike Ashley doesn't promise one thing and do another.

 

I think you are confused mind, Perez is the one Arsenal want 20m for not Wilshere.

 

That Mirror article says 20m for Wilshere and their money back (17m) for Perez

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Wilshere is 20M (with a year to go on his contract!!), we should go back for Cairney.

 

I'd take Perez though.

 

NB. This may be in a parallel universe where Mike Ashley doesn't promise one thing and do another.

 

I think you are confused mind, Perez is the one Arsenal want 20m for not Wilshere.

 

That's not what it says in the article

 

Wilshere has several other options - including Swansea and offers in Italy - but Arsenal do not want to loan him as he only has a year left and want around £20m for a permanent deal.

 

£20m for a guy with his injury problems and with only a year left on his contract is crazy mind

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs, it looks Perez is a good deal. 12-13M ish. That fee for Wilshere is crazy. He was class, but is a gamble now after all the injuries and the meh impact at Bournemouth.

 

Re Cairney, I reckon every Championship player has a price if you're a PL club with Rafa Benitez. Cairney's 27 in January, so the clock is ticking for chances to step up.

 

(again parallel universe where we spend money)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one's going to pay 20m for Wilshere. I'm excited if we get the fully fit Wilshere but on the other hand, we don't have the money to pay someone to be injured for half the year. Maybe next year.

The fact that Bournemouth don't seem interested is quite telling IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...