Jump to content

Recommended Posts

More than capable as a back up, but after a poor 1st 30 odd minutes i thought he grew into the game well, anyone with pace could destroy him. Not good enough to start. I prefer him to Manquillo personally as he looks to have decent quality on the ball, although being very slow is a worry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More than capable as a back up, but after a poor 1st 30 odd minutes i thought he grew into the game well, anyone with pace could destroy him. Not good enough to start. I prefer him to Manquillo personally as he looks to have decent quality on the ball, although being very slow is a worry.

 

AYe. Got caught out a couple times but Swans lacked quality. Do think he's better than Manquillo

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was solid second half and comfortable on the ball playing against pretty much nothing. The way some are going on about him on here you would think he'd just shown he was the next Roberto Carlos or Paulo Maldini.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Seemingly very low standards in here.

The scale here is that he's third choice, out of position and he's performed admirably despite being constantly targeted for their attacks. Not sure what the problem is.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Seemingly very low standards in here.

The scale here is that he's third choice, out of position and he's performed admirably despite being constantly targeted for their attacks. Not sure what the problem is.

Well he certainly wasn't constantly targeted.

 

He had a good, solid game after a poor start. Nothing more. He certainly wasn't superb as many are saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was solid second half and comfortable on the ball playing against pretty much nothing. The way some are going on about him on here you would think he'd just shown he was the next Roberto Carlos or Paulo Maldini.

 

Yee p*ssed?

 

No I've only had 4 cans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seemingly very low standards in here.

The scale here is that he's third choice, out of position and he's performed admirably despite being constantly targeted for their attacks. Not sure what the problem is.

Well he certainly wasn't constantly targeted.

 

He had a good, solid game after a poor start. Nothing more. He certainly wasn't superb as many are saying.

Its not like people to over react slightly after a game like. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Seemingly very low standards in here.

The scale here is that he's third choice, out of position and he's performed admirably despite being constantly targeted for their attacks. Not sure what the problem is.

Well he certainly wasn't constantly targeted.

 

He had a good, solid game after a poor start. Nothing more. He certainly wasn't superb as many are saying.

Well agree to disagree. I thought they were constantly down that side first half, then didn't bother second half.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...