The Butcher Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 No chance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 They've signed loads of kids who probably drag the average down Plus it's reported that they don't pay as high as Roman did for the top players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 (edited) They have massively cut their wage structure under the new ownership, it's why they cut adrift the likes of Mount because of his demands. Most of their signings have been young players from other markets. But total wage bill will be high due to the sheer number of players they have on the books. Edited August 17, 2024 by ponsaelius Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronson333 Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 9 hours ago, Doctor Zaius said: Mad how Sterling is still only 29. Classic case of a player playing since they were 17, hitting 500+ games well before they are 30 and basically being cooked. I feel similar may happen with Bellingham. He's only 21 but he's played 219 games already. Players bodies can only take so much regardless of age sometimes. Not always mind. That’s what makes Milner even more impressive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Chilwell told he can leave Chelsea Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 How will that work? Liverpool cannot sign him this window and loan him out to Bournemouth straightaway. So Valencia loan him to Bournemouth and Liverpool have obligation to buy after that loan? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 1 minute ago, KingArthur said: How will that work? Liverpool cannot sign him this window and loan him out to Bournemouth straightaway. So Valencia loan him to Bournemouth and Liverpool have obligation to buy after that loan? I think they can unless he actually plays for Valencia and Liverpool this season, meaning he can't play for a 3rd club in Bournemouth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Just now, Fak said: I think they can unless he actually plays for Valencia and Liverpool this season, meaning he can't play for a 3rd club in Bournemouth. Quote Premier League clubs cannot loan to another Premier League club a player they have acquired in the same transfer window. https://www.premierleague.com/news/464747 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Just now, KingArthur said: https://www.premierleague.com/news/464747 I for am absolutely stunned that Bailey is a clueless wanker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 1 hour ago, Optimistic Nut said: Is that real? Laughable claim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Fezzle said: I for am absolutely stunned that Bailey is a clueless wanker The article mentions that clause and basically says Liverpool are going to pretend to not be loaning him: “Valencia will bank £34 million. Liverpool are due to pay £30 million, with that final £4 million a loan fee stumped up via Bournemouth.” if true surely that’s a blatant and transparent attempt to subvert the rule which should be knocked on the head. Edited August 17, 2024 by leffe186 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Just now, leffe186 said: The article mentions that clause and basically says Liverpool are going to pretend to not be loaning him: “Valencia will bank £34 million. Liverpool are due to pay £30 million, with that final £4 million a loan fee stumped up via Bournemouth.” if true surely that’s a blatant and transparent attempt to subvert the rule and surely should be knocked on the head. Yeah that's clearly fucked up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Allison is only 31, plenty of years left for him to still be number 1 Or are they expecting to sell him to Saudi next season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 8 minutes ago, KingArthur said: https://www.premierleague.com/news/464747 Bloody hell, either that or they're bending the rules for Liverpool! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 11 hours ago, Doctor Zaius said: Mad how Sterling is still only 29. Classic case of a player playing since they were 17, hitting 500+ games well before they are 30 and basically being cooked. I feel similar may happen with Bellingham. He's only 21 but he's played 219 games already. Players bodies can only take so much regardless of age sometimes. Not always mind. If Bellingham keeps playing at his current rate he’ll be on 1000 odd games before he’s thirty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 2 minutes ago, leffe186 said: The article mentions that clause and basically says Liverpool are going to pretend to not be loaning him: “Valencia will bank £34 million. Liverpool are due to pay £30 million, with that final £4 million a loan fee stumped up via Bournemouth.” if true surely that’s a blatant and transparent attempt to subvert the rule which should be knocked on the head. I don’t get it. If Bournemouth are paying the loan fee to Liverpool then that makes it no different to any other loan. If they’re paying it to Valencia then they’re paying a loan fee to a club that won’t own him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 I'd love it if he was an absolute car crash of a keeper this season and Liverpool have to buy him regardless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 I know we likely couldn’t compete with Arsenal given what they could offer but Merino for €30m seems like such a bargain in today’s market. Where are you getting a player like that for that price? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybe_next_year Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Still only 28 too so plenty of years left in him. Seems like a million years since he was here so assumed he was older. Think that's a brilliant buy for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 1 hour ago, Kimbo said: I don’t get it. If Bournemouth are paying the loan fee to Liverpool then that makes it no different to any other loan. If they’re paying it to Valencia then they’re paying a loan fee to a club that won’t own him. Presumably they would like to buy him for £34M then immediately loan him to Bournemouth for a year for £4M. The rules say you can’t do that. So they reckon that by having Bournemouth loan him from Valencia for a year then agreeing to buy him for £30M at that time they “get round” the rules. Plus presumably also distorting PSR by shunting that 30M outlay back a year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 41 minutes ago, leffe186 said: Presumably they would like to buy him for £34M then immediately loan him to Bournemouth for a year for £4M. The rules say you can’t do that. So they reckon that by having Bournemouth loan him from Valencia for a year then agreeing to buy him for £30M at that time they “get round” the rules. Plus presumably also distorting PSR by shunting that 30M outlay back a year. Red shirted shithouse cartel cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 I can't believe this kid was available for £13m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted August 17, 2024 Share Posted August 17, 2024 Just what they need, another inconsistent attacking midfielder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now