Other clubs' transfers

[Astroblack]

I've seen the player Garnacho is going to turn into and it's Harvey Barnes. 

[Froggy]

1 hour ago, Menace said:

 

That's debatable. Bradley Barcola was around £40M and I would say he's better than Garnacho currently.

 

Barcola had a €45m release clause. 

 

Worth far more than that. 

[Pablo123]

49 minutes ago, Astroblack said:

I've seen the player Garnacho is going to turn into and it's Alan Barnes. 

Think he's got more pace, tbh

[duo]

2 hours ago, Cf said:

I don't think many clubs are going to be spending £50m on potential these days unless they feel that the potential is elite level. 

City can and will

[duo]

Be gutted if Cunha goes to Forrest - how are they able to spend more than us? 🤔

[joeyt]

15 minutes ago, duo said:

Be gutted if Cunha goes to Forrest - how are they able to spend more than us? 🤔

 

[duo]

4 minutes ago, joeyt said:

 

[nufc123]

29 minutes ago, duo said:

how are they able to spend more than us? 🤔

I know they have spent some money, but also sold for over 50m two seasons in a row if the Vlach sum is true.

[Nucasol]

Man City in no shits given heel turn. Glad we’re playing nicely-nice with the rules when these cunts are up to stuff like this:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ckg7rj9e4rdo

[KaKa]

47 minutes ago, Nucasol said:

Man City in no shits given heel turn. Glad we’re playing nicely-nice with the rules when these cunts are up to stuff like this:

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ckg7rj9e4rdo

 

Absolutely no need man.

 

Think they were only after around £18 million for him.

 

Awful.

[joeyt]

that's Kelly staying then

 

 

[Joelinton7]

It was reported they wanted Veiga and Kelly 

[gdm]

10 hours ago, joeyt said:

that's Kelly staying then

 

 

He was always staying. We are just shit at selling players 

[Pixelphish]

12 minutes ago, gdm said:

He was always staying. We are just shit at selling players 

 

Mostly because the players we need to sell, are shit (in context).

[toon25]

Is this Marmoush any good?

[gdm]

Just now, Pixelphish said:

 

Mostly because the players we need to sell, are shit (in context).

Agreed but like Almiron we could have had him off the books in the summer for not much less or more than we are getting for him now. 
 

we only sold Anderson because we agreed to take a player in a position we didn’t even need to strengthen. 
 

Trippier could have went to Bayern. Now he barely plays and we’ll get next to nothing for him

 

Should realistically cashed in on Wilson way before now and now we’ll get next to nothing for him. 
 

it’s all well and good not wanting to sell our big players but we have to be better at selling players that are starting to decline. We hold on to them and end up stuck with them 

[Groundhog63]

21 minutes ago, gdm said:

Agreed but like Almiron we could have had him off the books in the summer for not much less or more than we are getting for him now. 
 

we only sold Anderson because we agreed to take a player in a position we didn’t even need to strengthen. 
 

Trippier could have went to Bayern. Now he barely plays and we’ll get next to nothing for him

 

Should realistically cashed in on Wilson way before now and now we’ll get next to nothing for him. 
 

it’s all well and good not wanting to sell our big players but we have to be better at selling players that are starting to decline. We hold on to them and end up stuck with them 

 

Granted the Anderson transfer, wether pumped with the Greek or not, was forced on the club. I don't think Eddie's stopped mentioning him every presser. 

 

The rest of that post is largely, and not just your own opinion granted, totally hypothetical. 

 

Miggy could've gone to Saudi, apparently, but didn't want to. That's not his fault. No one else knocked on the door loud enough. 

Wilson? When do you think we should've sold him and, again, who was in for him? 

Trippier is still a very very good player. Again, granted, he could've gone if the Bayern approach was realistic but chose not to? If that was the case? Regardless of that, if we lose Tino who plays RB? Murphy? Who plays RW? Miggy? 

 

Ashley's stagnation and micey contractual ideology has left us with a bunch of players that NOBODY wants at a time when the markets are dead. A bunch of players who have, since Howe and fleetingly under Rafa, proved they can play PL top half football, at that. 

 

We need to be better at alot of things but selling players nobody is lining up for is a tall order. 

[joeyt]

1 hour ago, toon25 said:

Is this Marmoush any good?

 

I've never seen him play but I feel he's got flop written all over him just based on his career so far and the club he's joining

[Conjo]

1 hour ago, gdm said:

Agreed but like Almiron we could have had him off the books in the summer for not much less or more than we are getting for him now. 
 

we only sold Anderson because we agreed to take a player in a position we didn’t even need to strengthen. 
 

Trippier could have went to Bayern. Now he barely plays and we’ll get next to nothing for him

 

Should realistically cashed in on Wilson way before now and now we’ll get next to nothing for him. 
 

it’s all well and good not wanting to sell our big players but we have to be better at selling players that are starting to decline. We hold on to them and end up stuck with them 

 

It's not easy selling ice to eskimoes.

[gdm]

57 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said:

 

Granted the Anderson transfer, wether pumped with the Greek or not, was forced on the club. I don't think Eddie's stopped mentioning him every presser. 

 

The rest of that post is largely, and not just your own opinion granted, totally hypothetical. 

 

Miggy could've gone to Saudi, apparently, but didn't want to. That's not his fault. No one else knocked on the door loud enough. 

Wilson? When do you think we should've sold him and, again, who was in for him? 

Trippier is still a very very good player. Again, granted, he could've gone if the Bayern approach was realistic but chose not to? If that was the case? Regardless of that, if we lose Tino who plays RB? Murphy? Who plays RW? Miggy? 

 

Ashley's stagnation and micey contractual ideology has left us with a bunch of players that NOBODY wants at a time when the markets are dead. A bunch of players who have, since Howe and fleetingly under Rafa, proved they can play PL top half football, at that. 

 

We need to be better at alot of things but selling players nobody is lining up for is a tall order. 

Miggy could have went to Charlotte FC in the summer. It’s reported that we turned down not much less than what’s offered now. 
 

Wilson..oh probably about 3 injuries ago. There were rumours of clubs interested and I’m sure there would have been 

 

yes Trippier is still a good player but he’s on the decline and this is my point we can’t keep everyone until there are worth nothing. 
 

again you say Ashley has left us with players nobody wants but we turned down a bid from Charlotte FC for Almiron and we turned down bids from Bayern for Trippier and Also a Saudi club want Dubravka

 

 

Edited 5 hours ago by gdm

[gdm]

 

[Slim]

1 minute ago, gdm said:

 

Doged a bullet there

[Kanj]

Mad to think we could have nearly signed carlos and Botman in the GOAT January window.  

[madras]

Mam City splashing some cash on young players. 

 

Anyone foresee a punishment for the 100+ charges being a fine (easy payable) transfer ban (tipped off so buy now) and suspended points deduction ?

[Unbelievable]

17 minutes ago, madras said:

Mam City splashing some cash on young players. 

 

Anyone foresee a punishment for the 100+ charges being a fine (easy payable) transfer ban (tipped off so buy now) and suspended points deduction ?

Absolutely. Looks like they’re actively preparing by bringing forward all their transfer business for the next few years.