Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Magpie said:


About €210m by my reckoning. What's the fucking point? Seriously.

They have plenty of headroom they have massive revenue and sold Alvarez and a bunch of kids. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

They have plenty of headroom they have massive revenue and sold Alvarez and a bunch of kids. 


It's completely rigged though, everyone can see it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Rich said:

Not wrong, but 'headroom' is fast becoming my new most-hated football-related word :lol:

 

I hope you're not questioning the beautiful game. I remember when I was a lad at school, me and all my mates gathered around Excel 97 arguing over whether our 97/98 revenue was adequate to allow us to get another loan (with an obligation to buy) in before the transfer window slammed shut. I miss those days 🥹

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TRC said:

Does this take Bruno G off the table for them in the summer? I know nothing of this guy they signed.

 Not at all. If this González transfer doesn't work out, they'll simply sign another player. Such is their headroom :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, toon25 said:

Felix being pumped out to Milan on loan [emoji38]

 

Fucking Chelsea, man [emoji38]

 

Does Felix just turn up at clubs and everyone's like 'bit weird him isn't he?' and then he's moved on again? 

 

I've never known anything like it. I swear he's either an industry plant or he's part of a laundering scheme. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

Does Felix just turn up at clubs and everyone's like 'bit weird him isn't he?' and then he's moved on again? 

 

I've never known anything like it. I swear he's either an industry plant or he's part of a laundering scheme. 


Money laundering or incontinence are the only rational conclusions IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Disco said:


Money laundering or incontinence are the only rational conclusions IMO.

 

Like, he shits his pants all the time and it's really awkward so they decide to move him on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do loans work when there is an obligation to buy, around the wages of the player.

Take Rashford, I know theres no obligation in that case, but had there been and he does ok for Villa so they sign him for £40million, what if they say the most they can pay him is £200k a week and he doesnt sign, where does that leave the obligation to buy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Belfast Boy said:

How do loans work when there is an obligation to buy, around the wages of the player.

Take Rashford, I know theres no obligation in that case, but had there been and he does ok for Villa so they sign him for £40million, what if they say the most they can pay him is £200k a week and he doesnt sign, where does that leave the obligation to buy?

It would be included in the loan contract. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The three sinister six in the most shit being able to buy their way out of trouble is absolutely chef's kiss. Love PSR. Hilarious that Chelsea haven't done any business now they're seemingly pretty settled. I hear Felix is leaving on loan though. :lol: What a good permanent signing that was. £50m was it? Matters not! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...