Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:01, SteV said:

Feels like they’re gambling the house on getting back into CL. 
 

Not sure that’s too clever…

Expand  


gambling the house how? Three loan signings plus Malen plus we’ve sold 85m worth in this window.  

 

We’ve got plenty of money, we just can’t spend it as we want for the same reasons you can’t. 
 

The difference is we make a ton of money selling players too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d be a lot wiser to reserve judgement but I do feel that their 3 recent signings are poor, albeit they’re just loans. 
 

They give the impression of spectacle signings which work out for a few games and come crashing down, somewhat like Coutinho - although this crop aren’t half as talented as he was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:04, brummie said:


gambling the house how? Three loan signings plus Malen plus we’ve sold 85m worth in this window.  

 

We’ve got plenty of money, we just can’t spend it as we want for the same reasons you can’t. 
 

The difference is we make a ton of money selling players too. 

Expand  

At 96% wages to turnover ratio. Bringing in players on higher wages than the ones you’re selling. Obviously the money from this seasons CL will help enormously, and you have to assume the people in charge aren’t being completely reckless - but I’m very intrigued to see how they get anywhere near the 70% that’s supposed to be needed going forward.

 

 

Edited by SteV

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:04, brummie said:


gambling the house how? Three loan signings plus Malen plus we’ve sold 85m worth in this window.  

 

We’ve got plenty of money, we just can’t spend it as we want for the same reasons you can’t. 
 

The difference is we make a ton of money selling players too. 

Expand  

Ton of money seriously boosted by our ownership group ironically enough 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:13, SteV said:

At 96% wages to turnover ratio. Bringing in players on higher wages than the ones you’re selling. Obviously the money from this seasons CL will help enormously, and you have to assume the people in charge aren’t being completely reckless - but I’m very intrigued to see how they get anywhere near the 70% that’s supposed to be needed going forward.

 

 

 

Expand  

 

They're here for possibly as little as four months each, so it's not a multi year commitment to stupid wages. We're in the last 16 of the CL, and clearly in need of a shot in the arm. 

 

Football is for fun, fuck it, have a go at it. The alternative was what, mook about fretting about wage bills?

 

The people running us are not stupid, they are aware of the rules

 

Again, I keep saying this, but we are really clever in the way we move players around. We've sold two youth products twice each in the last season and a half because of clever sales deals. We've just booked, what, £50m profit on a player who wasn't even a regular starter for us, who we bought from the MLS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:12, KaKa said:

 

Villa have managed their money better than us the last four years.

 

Their manager is also more open to bringing in temporary loans.

 

It's really quite simple.

Expand  


They've sold a good few players for decent fees is the reason 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:13, SteV said:

At 96% wages to turnover ratio. Bringing in players on higher wages than the ones you’re selling. Obviously the money from this seasons CL will help enormously, and you have to assume the people in charge aren’t being completely reckless - but I’m very intrigued to see how they get anywhere near the 70% that’s supposed to be needed going forward.

 

 

 

Expand  

 

Revenue for this season is massively up already - £70m earnings from UEFA alone in the CL this season, that's not including matchday revenue, significantly more lucrative sponsorship and shirt deals, a youth policy that generates decent revenue, astute spending, clever recruitment (Tielemans and Kamara for no transfer fee) - the NBA commercial bloke (who is a massive wanker) they brought in has the target of hitting £400m revenue asap.

 

For years the club was run like a corner shop, and that didn't stop when Ellis fucked off, Lerner was the same, threw money at it but had zero idea how to run a football club. Finally, people who understand it, and have the money to back it in charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:12, KaKa said:

 

Villa have managed their money better than us the last four years.

 

Their manager is also more open to bringing in temporary loans.

 

It's really quite simple.

Expand  

Villa got an obscene amount for Grealish. Without that they wouldn’t have been able to have a go. They sold a 50m player for twice his value, and have been excellent ever since they replaced their fraud managers.

if we could have sold one of our wingers, ASM. Miggy or Murphy for a similar amount, we would be title challengers now. Sad thing is, we spent good money on all of them. Shows the value of building your own ‘superstars’

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:27, brummie said:

 

Revenue for this season is massively up already - £70m earnings from UEFA alone in the CL this season, that's not including matchday revenue, significantly more lucrative sponsorship and shirt deals, a youth policy that generates decent revenue, astute spending, clever recruitment (Tielemans and Kamara for no transfer fee) - the NBA commercial bloke (who is a massive wanker) they brought in has the target of hitting £400m revenue asap.

 

For years the club was run like a corner shop, and that didn't stop when Ellis fucked off, Lerner was the same, threw money at it but had zero idea how to run a football club. Finally, people who understand it, and have the money to back it in charge.

Expand  

Enough to reduce the wages to turnover ratio by 25%+, despite the wage bill presumably increasing?

 

Obviously none of us know the actual answer to that. And you are right, in that it’s more fun to concentrate on the actual football rather than all this malarkey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:12, KaKa said:

 

Villa have managed their money better than us the last four years.

 

Their manager is also more open to bringing in temporary loans.

 

It's really quite simple.

Expand  

So why are they chucking all of that good planning in the bin and going for short term big names on expensive wages?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:50, Joelinton7 said:

So why are they chucking all of that good planning in the bin and going for short term big names on expensive wages?

Expand  

 

What?!

 

Because it's January and they are players the manager wants to bring in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 03/02/2025 at 21:59, Joelinton7 said:

I’m not sure we’d do it even without PSR issues. It’s just bad future planning. They’re gambling for CL.

Expand  

 

Well they're not Newcastle and they are going about it the way they see fit.

 

I also doubt any of us have enough information to know whether they are gambling or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...