Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Pokerprince2004 said:

Shame. 

 

Do Spurs have anyone who would bring in a lot of money? Kulacevski is the only one I'd be tempted to go for but even he would be a bit underwhelming. Fallen a long, long way this season 

 

Kulusevski would be a quality signing. 10 goals and 10 assists in all competitions this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So tottenham are complete opposite to us, FFP rich but cash poor 

 

Also, would Villa still be paying Rashford's wages if he is out for the season? Not sure if loans have a break in contract for situations like season long injuries etc 

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, janpawel said:

So tottenham are complete opposite to us, FFP rich but cash poor 

 

Also, would Villa still be paying Rashford's wages if he is out for the season? Not sure if loans have a break in contract for situations like season long injuries etc 

 

Of course they would. The alternative is that we're saddled with his wages after Villa injured him.

 

Any chance of us getting £40m for him in the summer is gone now though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

Of course they would. The alternative is that we're saddled with his wages after Villa injured him.

 

Any chance of us getting £40m for him in the summer is gone now though. 

Our owners love bailing out premier league teams. Don't give up hope yet. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

Of course they would. The alternative is that we're saddled with his wages after Villa injured him.

 

Any chance of us getting £40m for him in the summer is gone now though. 

How long is he out for like? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, janpawel said:

So tottenham are complete opposite to us, FFP rich but cash poor 

 

Also, would Villa still be paying Rashford's wages if he is out for the season? Not sure if loans have a break in contract for situations like season long injuries etc 


You would have thought all that extra revenue from the new ground would help.  Maybe not when you are 16th in the league, and most likely have a shit load of debt to pay for the ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Irony if Villa have to sell and it’s Chelsea making the move. Chelsea are a stain on football.

 

Think Villa would want Watkins out instead of Rogers, but if there’s no takers then their hand may be forced elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

Irony if Villa have to sell and it’s Chelsea making the move. Chelsea are a stain on football.

 

Think Villa would want Watkins out instead of Rogers, but if there’s no takers then their hand may be forced elsewhere.

Wonder if we are in a position this summer to take advantage of clubs needing to sell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

Irony if Villa have to sell and it’s Chelsea making the move. Chelsea are a stain on football.

 

Think Villa would want Watkins out instead of Rogers, but if there’s no takers then their hand may be forced elsewhere.

Chelsea signing Rogers would be the biggest “fuck you” to any sliver of remaining credibility PSR has. I see this morning it’s two new centre halves - Huijsen plus another, a new attacking midfielder and a new centre forward.


All this potentially done on a non-CL revenue basis. They’re fucking scum and the sooner some cunt pulls the rug on them, the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...