Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

Don’t want Gittens anyway. Yes it’s annoying how Chelsea keep buying every winger and other players left, right and centre.

 

Having said this, it’s also one of the reasons why they aren’t performing at the level they should. Along with no experienced players. At least something positive about them being annoying I guess. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Ikon said:

Don’t want Gittens anyway. Yes it’s annoying how Chelsea keep buying every winger and other players left, right and centre.

 

Having said this, it’s also one of the reasons why they aren’t performing at the level they should. Along with no experienced players. At least something positive about them being annoying I guess. 

 

Every time I see a discussion about him Dortmund fans seem to say he's way overhyped (probably cos he's English). If that is true then I'm glad we're not in for every randomly hyped player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:


Would rather have Elanga. Would rather have Murphy. 

I'd rather not have any of them. Murphy can be a solid bench player for us. The other two, no thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

Elanga rather than Madueke? What?

 

Elanga has been the more productive player the last two seasons. Playing in a team with less talent around him.

 

Madueke looks great taking players on, but is prone to making a mess of his final ball or shot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KaKa said:

 

Elanga has been the more productive player the last two seasons. Playing in a team with less talent around him.

 

Madueke looks great taking players on, but is prone to making a mess of his final ball or shot.

Madueke has more G+A in fewer games. Better team yes, but we don't need a player who is mostly a counterattacking threat. At least for at the price Forest are asking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

Madueke has more G+A in fewer games. Better team yes, but we don't need a player who is mostly a counterattacking threat. At least for at the price Forest are asking.

 

Forest play a counter attacking system. That doesn't mean that is all Elanga is good for.

 

I trust Elanga far more to deliver a decent ball or finish a chance in the final third.

 

Madueke can often be quite rash and snatches at things in similar circumstances.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Elanga had been signed from the Eredivisie direct to Forest, and Madueke was a Man Utd youth product that had been pied off, the opinions on them would be completely reversed. Elanga is not only faster he has better final ball and that is reflected in the creative output. If you take away Madueke's early season hat trick against Wolves he has done almost nothing in the PL this season really.

 

I think Chelsea would swap them in an instant if offered. Would Forest?

 

 

Edited by ponsaelius

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...