r0cafella Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Just now, The College Dropout said: Sancho deal is crazy. I can’t believe it. What psr desperation does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 7 minutes ago, TaylorJ_01 said: Ederson to Fenerbache. It really says a lot about that club, that you can play nearly 400 games for them and just quietly leave without anyone caring. It means nothing. Customer FC. Much like Human Capital Athletic in West London. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 1 minute ago, r0cafella said: What psr desperation does. 80% of Sancho’s wage is the opposite of PSR desperation. I genuinely can’t believe they would pay Sancho £200k odd per week. That’s what £10m? Plus a loan fee. I mean.. I actually don’t believe it. Romano must be chatting shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Just now, The College Dropout said: 80% of Sancho’s wage is the opposite of PSR desperation. I genuinely can’t believe they would pay Sancho £200k odd per week. That’s what £10m? Plus a loan fee. I mean.. I actually don’t believe it. Romano must be chatting shit. Did they not set a precedent for it with Trashford’s wages? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 1 minute ago, The College Dropout said: 80% of Sancho’s wage is the opposite of PSR desperation. I genuinely can’t believe they would pay Sancho £200k odd per week. That’s what £10m? Plus a loan fee. I mean.. I actually don’t believe it. Romano must be chatting shit. They are repeating the gamble they made last season. Backfired then and I reckon it will backfire for them again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 6 minutes ago, Nucasol said: Did they not set a precedent for it with Trashford’s wages? Rashford is genuinely a top talent though. Over 150 career goals. Multiple seasons scoring 10+ goals in the PL. Rashford has been awful at times but he’s proven himself. That game against PSG he was brilliant last season. People need to put some respect on his name and his career. Jadon Sancho is an inferior talent and has never done anything in the PL consistently. I wouldn’t believe any club in Europe would pay him£200k per week outside of Juve or someone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 5 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: Rashford is genuinely a top talent though. Over 150 career goals. Multiple seasons scoring 10+ goals in the PL. Rashford has been awful at times but he’s proven himself. That game against PSG he was brilliant last season. People need to put some respect on his name and his career. Jadon Sancho is an inferior talent and has never done anything in the PL consistently. I wouldn’t believe any club in Europe would pay him£200k per week outside of Juve or someone. Surprised Bayern weren't in for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 41 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: 80% of Sancho’s wage is the opposite of PSR desperation. I genuinely can’t believe they would pay Sancho £200k odd per week. That’s what £10m? Plus a loan fee. I mean.. I actually don’t believe it. Romano must be chatting shit. It didn't come from Romano. It came from our tier 1 sources. It's true, and the rest of the wage is on the line for Villa as well but it's based on performances from Sancho. Basically if he plays decent, it'll be 100% coverage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Villa seem to be in lots of trouble , they gambled on demi going for big money Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 25 minutes ago, astraguy said: Villa seem to be in lots of trouble , they gambled on demi going for big money Marco Bizot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 1 hour ago, Froggy said: It didn't come from Romano. It came from our tier 1 sources. It's true, and the rest of the wage is on the line for Villa as well but it's based on performances from Sancho. Basically if he plays decent, it'll be 100% coverage. Yeh it's barmy to me. I've liked how aggressive Volla have been with PSR but that's stupid. That's Isak level wages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 1 minute ago, The College Dropout said: Yeh it's barmy to me. I've liked how aggressive Volla have been with PSR but that's stupid. That's Isak level wages. I always maintained the opposite when you were glazing them hard. Chickens are home to roost for them now though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 5 minutes ago, r0cafella said: I always maintained the opposite when you were glazing them hard. Chickens are home to roost for them now though. They were a Emi Martinez sending off away from back to back CL qualification. Their biggest mistake last season was not going for it in the summer, they left themselves too much work to do in the second half of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Just now, The College Dropout said: They were a Emi Martinez sending off away from back to back CL qualification. Their biggest mistake last season was not going for it in the summer, they left themselves too much work to do in the second half of the season. Yeah but the margin isn't relevant here, you either make it or you don't. We also choked hard as well. They took a high risk approach by doing things which are unsustainable and are paying the price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahoneys Tache Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Just seen forests two late signings. Points deduction surely coming now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 5 hours ago, cubaricho said: You do know he had no choice right? "When Newcastle finally agreed a £27m fee in late July, Manchester City were able to match it due to a buyback clause — and the goalkeeper chose his former club." - Chris Waugh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 10 hours ago, toontownman said: Elliot for 30m is a great deal They wanted 50m a month ago. Lets see if Emery can get Sancho back on track. Having to pay 200m a week is nuts. Bloody hell, not even Targett was on that much Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 1 hour ago, r0cafella said: Yeah but the margin isn't relevant here, you either make it or you don't. We also choked hard as well. They took a high risk approach by doing things which are unsustainable and are paying the price. You judge a strategy by how good the strategy is - the execution didn't land by a whisker but that's evidence that the strategy was viable. I don't agree with some of thier moves. But they haven't sold a starter since Douglas Luiz (who they replaced). I still think their squad is stronger than ours. I just don't rate the Sancho signing financially or on the pitch. Villa gave Emery a CL level squad and he didn't deliver. Our whole project is being held together by Eddie Howe. If Nick W doesn't become a serious player, I think even our first team isn't as good as theirs. Isak was the difference between the starting teams imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Just now, The College Dropout said: You judge a strategy by how good the strategy is - the execution didn't land by a whisker but that's evidence that the strategy was viable. I don't agree with some of thier moves. But they haven't sold a starter since Douglas Luiz (who they replaced). I still think their squad is stronger than ours. I just don't rate the Sancho signing financially or on the pitch. Villa gave Emery a CL level squad and he didn't deliver. Our whole project is being held together by Eddie Howe. If Nick W doesn't become a serious player, I think even our first team isn't as good as theirs. Isak was the difference between the starting teams imo. Agree but the strategy they pursued was go all in. And bare in mind a certain degree of fortune was in play last season with English clubs getting an extra place and two cartel members being well off the pace. The strategy they pursued was just an extremely high risk one and now they have to pay for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 (edited) There’s no way Villa’s squad is stronger than ours, that’s insane. Edited September 2, 2025 by AyeDubbleYoo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 10 hours ago, r0cafella said: Elliot will be a bad deal as they've definitely left some of the potential upside for Liverpool to take back. It's been reported all summer that if the upfront fee is low Liverpool will take a sell on clause and a buyback. It's basically a really expensive loan How? If he does ok, he is still not good enough for Liverpool. They won't buy him back unless he starts to bang them in, which he will not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Just now, KingArthur said: How? If he does ok, he is still not good enough for Liverpool. They won't buy him back unless he starts to bang them in, which he will not. Buy back is just what aspect of it right? Say he does well and is worth 75m if the buyback is 50m they buyback and flip this is the new wave. Even if they don't buy him back, they still get a cut of any future fee. This is the new cartel meta. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: There’s no way Villa’s squad is stronger than ours, that’s insane. Lewis Miley and Osula wouldn't get a kick for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 1 minute ago, The College Dropout said: Lewis Miley and Osula wouldn't get a kick for them. Why did they try and sign him then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted September 2, 2025 Share Posted September 2, 2025 Just now, r0cafella said: Buy back is just what aspect of it right? Say he does well and is worth 75m if the buyback is 50m they buyback and flip this is the new wave. Even if they don't buy him back, they still get a cut of any future fee. This is the new cartel meta. They get a cut of the fee, but he is mediocre player and most likely be a squad player for Villa. They got him pretty cheap. They have a buy back, which I guess means Liverpool can match any offer like City with Trafford? But for me it looks like they flopped him out bc they don't need him but they need to sell some fringe players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now