Tiresias Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 its mad that diaz can shove schar over well after the whistle and that isn't considered violent conduct and that head movement is. I hate to use the phrase common sense but some surely has to be used here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Just caught up on the highlights. absolute joke, it’s been said already but it’s absolutely 2 yellows or 2 reds, common sense would be to book them both and carry on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 The abuse Diaz got for the rest of his pitch time was heartwarming, scruffy looking cunt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 (edited) Got so say that in the art of being a slimy cunt, Diaz did it beatifully. First "mistakenly" pushing him, acting like he thought the ball was still in play. Then him actually initiating the head contact without anyone noticing in it real time. Cant really credit him for being born slimy looking, but still.. 10/10. Edited August 18 by Displayname Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 it was excellent shithousery its just mad can get away with it in the age of VAR wtf is the point of var if not shit like that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 hours ago, Tiresias said: its mad that diaz can shove schar over well after the whistle and that isn't considered violent conduct and that head movement is. I hate to use the phrase common sense but some surely has to be used here. It's not just mad, it shows how stupidly the laws are applied. That shove was hard enough to knock Schar over, it could easily be termed assault. I don't see why putting hands on a player face to face is a sending off offence, but when you charge him from behind it's because football is a contact sport. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 3 minutes ago, TRon said: It's not just mad, it shows how stupidly the laws are applied. That shove was hard enough to knock Schar over, it could easily be termed assault. I don't see why putting hands on a player face to face is a sending off offence, but when you charge him from behind it's because football is a contact sport. I think his only defense here would be that he thought the ball was still in play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 hours ago, Colos Short and Curlies said: Just caught up on the highlights. absolute joke, it’s been said already but it’s absolutely 2 yellows or 2 reds, common sense would be to book them both and carry on. Yellow each for the head to head, plus a yellow for the simulation by BBD imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 best outome we can except is that we appeal the red card. it wont get overturned but they may reduce it to a one match ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Displayname said: I think his only defense here would be that he thought the ball was still in play. Nah, really clear whistle. Diaz just decided to barge Schar over, verbally abuse him and hope what did happen, would happen. Could have been no real argument if Diaz had been booked for the completely unnecessary and excess barge and both players getting yellows for touching heads. Edited August 18 by Tsunami Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 14 minutes ago, Displayname said: I think his only defense here would be that he thought the ball was still in play. Then the two armed shove in someone’s back is an automatic foul anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Displayname Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 5 minutes ago, Tsunami said: Nah, really clear whistle. Diaz just decided to barge Schar over, verbally abuse him and hope what did happen, would happen. Could have been no real argument if Diaz had been booked for the completely unnecessary and excess barge and both players getting yellows for touching heads. Dont get me wrong, I dont believe for a second myself that he actually thought the ball was still in play. Have a player ever been given 2 yellow cards for the "same" situation though? Dont think I have ever seen it being done in practice before. If so he should have gotten a 3rd for the theatrics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Displayname said: Dont get me wrong, I dont believe for a second myself that he actually thought the ball was still in play. Have a player ever been given 2 yellow cards for the "same" situation though? Dont think I have ever seen it being done in practice before. If so he should have gotten a 3rd for the theatrics. Martinelli in a cup game comes to mind. They are supposed to do it still. Edited August 18 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abacus Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 If Schar knew the whistle had gone, he wouldn't have cared less by later being barged over (another foul anyway) and so wouldn't have reacted like that. Whether you agree with the sending off or not, this is all on the ref for making a mess and losing control of the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 I hope they at least reduce the ban. 3 games for that is madness. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Schar knew the foul had been given. He was going over to collect the ball and, if anything, Schar reacted more because of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 31 minutes ago, Displayname said: Dont get me wrong, I dont believe for a second myself that he actually thought the ball was still in play. Have a player ever been given 2 yellow cards for the "same" situation though? Dont think I have ever seen it being done in practice before. If so he should have gotten a 3rd for the theatrics. I'm sure it happened last season at one point. I've got no idea who it was though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbo_11 Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 15 minutes ago, Nobody said: I'm sure it happened last season at one point. I've got no idea who it was though I'm not sure if it was classed as the same situation, but Dalot for Man Utd last season againt Liverpool was a pretty quick yellows to red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cf Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Video of it with Martinelli Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boey_Jarton Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 2 hours ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said: I hope they at least reduce the ban. 3 games for that is madness. The fact he will miss the best part of four games, 10 percent of the season , purely because of the decision of an opponent to perform theatrics, is utterly absurd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
80 Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Fabian says relax! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Is it possible to reduce the ban? Reducing it would mean saying it wasn’t violent conduct and hence not a red surely? So three marches or zero…? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
80 Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 Just now, Superior Acuña said: Is it possible to reduce the ban? Reducing it would mean saying it wasn’t violent conduct and hence not a red surely? So three marches or zero…? I think that's probably the situation, yeah. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 8 hours ago, robbo_11 said: I'm not sure if it was classed as the same situation, but Dalot for Man Utd last season againt Liverpool was a pretty quick yellows to red. Yeah. He got one for dissent, kept going and got another one within seconds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now