Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m still pro-VAR but the usage has been awful.

 

Example yesterday, Krul’s two saves shouldn’t have stood by the letter of the law. Even after VAR reviews they still allowed them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering at this point if there's actually a chance they'll just scrap it. It isn't working anywhere near to properly. The shortlist of 'biggest joke VAR decisions' must have at least ten contenders on it and we're only a quarter into the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering at this point if there's actually a chance they'll just scrap it. It isn't working anywhere near to properly. The shortlist of 'biggest joke VAR decisions' must have at least ten contenders on it and we're only a quarter into the season.

 

Isn't it working according to their own criteria though? Seems to me that this idea of only correcting 'clear and obvious errors' is what's making them look bad, but that's actually how it was designed to work.

 

People assumed it would be there to get decisions right, spot fouls etc, but it's a lot more complicated than that (by design).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...