nufcjb Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 This is nothing but I might be wrong here so correct if that's the case but why do these fakeover stories break over the weekends or a holiday then nothing is said in the days that follow or on working days? I think that BZG story also broke on a weekend or a Bank holiday. This one was also on a Saturday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosenrot Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 This is nothing but I might be wrong here so correct if that's the case but why do these fakeover stories break over the weekends or a holiday then nothing is said in the days that follow or on working days? I think that BZG story also broke on a weekend or a Bank holiday. This one was also on a Saturday. Lubricated weekend lips sink ships. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 This is nothing but I might be wrong here so correct if that's the case but why do these fakeover stories break over the weekends or a holiday then nothing is said in the days that follow or on working days? I think that BZG story also broke on a weekend or a Bank holiday. This one was also on a Saturday. Sunday of the Bank Holiday weekend when the mackems lost the Play-Off final! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 I get the sentiment of the statement, but it's futile, Ashley knows most supporters want him gone, the statement is moot. What should have been put out there or should be put out there if he stays is an intent to starve the club of support and most importantly money. Supporters need to make a stand once and for all if he stays, this has to be proof that continuing to line his pockets will not see him "eventually sell anyway". A continued and relentless boycott has to be the last and only option to forcibly remove him, not more excuses to line his pockets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 We’re at the crossroads. If he doesn’t sell now, that’s me convinced that he’s not going to sell in the forseeable future, as there can be no ”time wasters” or ”show me the money” excuses this time. If he DOES sell, a different future lies ahead. This is big. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosenrot Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Wish this would just go through already. I want to party like its 2001. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 I dont know why he just doesnt sell and go buy sunderland for the 30mill or whatever , it would be a good deal/opportunity for him he could learn from our experience and the mackems would love him. They already do. He'd do well with them to the point where they are back in the PL tbf. He'd get praise form them, and they would ridicule us about how we could possibly have disliked him. He saved us from oblivion you know….It's only after 2-3 years back in the PL that some of them will realize that there's no desire to push on after promotion even though they seemingly have everything in place to do so, and 2-3 relegation/promotions before it sinks in for the majority. Would be fun to see it unfold. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwoForJoy Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 I dont know why he just doesnt sell and go buy sunderland for the 30mill or whatever , it would be a good deal/opportunity for him he could learn from our experience and the mackems would love him. They already do. He'd do well with them to the point where they are back in the PL tbf. He'd get praise form them, and they would ridicule us about how we could possibly have disliked him. He saved us from oblivion you know….It's only after 2-3 years back in the PL that some of them will realize that there's no desire to push on after promotion even though they seemingly have everything in place to do so, and 2-3 relegation/promotions before it sinks in for the majority. Would be fun to see it unfold. As long as he keeps his horrific Derby record, I'm fine with it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 There is no way he’ll buy the mackems, not whilst they are in League 1 in anyway. They are losing money, parachute payments have stopped, there is no money in it for him until the are at least back in to the Championship. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Just fucking sell us fattie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Knowing him he will sell to the shittest option out of spite. That said no he wont because the shittest option is him staying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Him buying Sunderland would make sense tbh. Would probably get them back in Prem for about what £100M? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 sunderland's a terrible choice for him I think. They're a loss making operation whatever division there in, effectively above their station in the PL. That's why he's here (£) and why he wouldn't go there. But I do agree that buying some championship club for a fraction of what he'd get for us will ensure his brand gets its advertising at a decent level but not much else seems likely. As PL status is perpetually at risk for us under his guidance it would be even less likely at a smaller club. I'd think a Charlton or someone. But part of the reason he picked us was probably not wanting to do an experiment on his own door step and keep the bomb site as far away as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 I get the sentiment of the statement, but it's futile, Ashley knows most supporters want him gone, the statement is moot. What should have been put out there or should be put out there if he stays is an intent to starve the club of support and most importantly money. Supporters need to make a stand once and for all if he stays, this has to be proof that continuing to line his pockets will not see him "eventually sell anyway". A continued and relentless boycott has to be the last and only option to forcibly remove him, not more excuses to line his pockets. It’s when you see on social media the people who still go criticising it. If they didn’t go he’d be more likely to sell without the need for such statements. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 I get the sentiment of the statement, but it's futile, Ashley knows most supporters want him gone, the statement is moot. What should have been put out there or should be put out there if he stays is an intent to starve the club of support and most importantly money. Supporters need to make a stand once and for all if he stays, this has to be proof that continuing to line his pockets will not see him "eventually sell anyway". A continued and relentless boycott has to be the last and only option to forcibly remove him, not more excuses to line his pockets. It’s when you see on social media the people who still go criticising it. If they didn’t go he’d be more likely to sell without the need for such statements. You know it's the same fuckers who "support da teem, not da regime" and belittle any effort to get rid of Ashley whilst also stating they want him gone but no one will stop them going to watch their team. The same tools that sing "Brewcie gizza wave", boo Jolinton and Perez but sit in silence when Ashley attends his first game in a year. Then have the audacity to scoff at any attempt to protest, whatever the form, Neanderthals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 sunderland's a terrible choice for him I think. They're a loss making operation whatever division there in, effectively above their station in the PL. That's why he's here (£) and why he wouldn't go there. But I do agree that buying some championship club for a fraction of what he'd get for us will ensure his brand gets its advertising at a decent level but not much else seems likely. As PL status is perpetually at risk for us under his guidance it would be even less likely at a smaller club. I'd think a Charlton or someone. But part of the reason he picked us was probably not wanting to do an experiment on his own door step and keep the bomb site as far away as possible. Aye . He milked it for the first year before everybody knew what he was about, but once it became clear he just saw us as mugs to build his brand, he keeps a tidy distance and leaves his lickspittles like Charnley to deal with the fallout. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. Yimentov Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 sunderland's a terrible choice for him I think. They're a loss making operation whatever division there in, effectively above their station in the PL. That's why he's here (£) and why he wouldn't go there. But I do agree that buying some championship club for a fraction of what he'd get for us will ensure his brand gets its advertising at a decent level but not much else seems likely. As PL status is perpetually at risk for us under his guidance it would be even less likely at a smaller club. I'd think a Charlton or someone. But part of the reason he picked us was probably not wanting to do an experiment on his own door step and keep the bomb site as far away as possible. Aye . He milked it for the first year before everybody knew what he was about, but once it became clear he just saw us as mugs to build his brand, he keeps a tidy distance and leaves his lickspittles like Charnley to deal with the fallout. I don't think it's that simple. He genuinely enjoyed being popular with the fans and probably thought we could go places under his business model. If I'm not mistaken didn't Ashley finance all or most of hippo head's signings? Smith, Beye, Barton, Cacapa, Faye, Enqriue, Viduka, Geremi... That was Mike's most generous time since he's been here. Once his incompetence and deceitful ways became too much for Kev everything changed but I don't think he set out with wholly ill intent. As Alan Pardew once summarised: "Mike doesn't always understand football. It confuses him." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinnMag Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Quote from Chronicle: Given the presence of Saudi funds in this approach, will Ashley make it “put up or shut up” in the final negotiations? Remember Ashley's riposte to Bin Zayed: "What difference would £10million either way make"? Back then he said of the prospect of negotiating with a hugely wealthy potential owner: "Why would you even cared what you're paying?" Did Ashley really said those brain farts? :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Little Waster Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Professor Simon Chadwick is a professor of Sports Enterprise at the Salford Business School, part of the University of Salford. He’s got some knowledge of Saudi Arabia and the Royal Family’s approach to business. He’s not too sure regarding the link to Newcastle United. *** “Have canvassed views of Saudi Arabians I know (in Saudi Arabia) about the proposed country takeover of NUFC. Three common responses: 1) ‘nobody is talking about it here, not an issue’; 2) ‘if it’s true, it’s a private investor, not the government’; 3) ‘no way this will happen’. “Neom, Qiddiya, the Red Sea Project, Saudi Aramco, Uber, Tesla - some of the investments Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund are funding or invested into. Also working closely with Japan’s Softbank & founder Masayoshi Son, which were given $100bn to invest in value-adding assets “Neom to cost $500 billion; Qiddiya likely to cost about the same. Red Sea Project also likely to cost billions. Public Investment Fund’s Uber stake cost £3 billion. And to this hugely valuable, infrastructure & tech focused portfolio, PIF wants to add Newcastle United...!!??!!??” Oh Well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Quote from Chronicle: Given the presence of Saudi funds in this approach, will Ashley make it “put up or shut up” in the final negotiations? Remember Ashley's riposte to Bin Zayed: "What difference would £10million either way make"? Back then he said of the prospect of negotiating with a hugely wealthy potential owner: "Why would you even cared what you're paying?" Did Ashley really said those brain farts? :lol: Funny how he doesn't have such flippant views with regards to player transfers. I mean come on Mike, what difference is 1 or 2m ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-7943189/amp/CRAIG-HOPE-fans-sceptical-just-sides-Newcastle-takeover-saga.html?__twitter_impression=true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facundo Ferreyra Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Professor Simon Chadwick is a professor of Sports Enterprise at the Salford Business School, part of the University of Salford. He’s got some knowledge of Saudi Arabia and the Royal Family’s approach to business. He’s not too sure regarding the link to Newcastle United. *** “Have canvassed views of Saudi Arabians I know (in Saudi Arabia) about the proposed country takeover of NUFC. Three common responses: 1) ‘nobody is talking about it here, not an issue’; 2) ‘if it’s true, it’s a private investor, not the government’; 3) ‘no way this will happen’. “Neom, Qiddiya, the Red Sea Project, Saudi Aramco, Uber, Tesla - some of the investments Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund are funding or invested into. Also working closely with Japan’s Softbank & founder Masayoshi Son, which were given $100bn to invest in value-adding assets “Neom to cost $500 billion; Qiddiya likely to cost about the same. Red Sea Project also likely to cost billions. Public Investment Fund’s Uber stake cost £3 billion. And to this hugely valuable, infrastructure & tech focused portfolio, PIF wants to add Newcastle United...!!??!!??” Oh Well I don't see why any of that is relevant, especially when the interest has been confirmed. They'd want to turn NUFC into a massively valuable and successful sporting powerhouse, they know the fanbase is there and it's a much cheaper option than other clubs with similar sized fanbases. Makes sense from a business standpoint surely? Buy cheap, increase its value. The Ashley model. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Professor Simon Chadwick is a professor of Sports Enterprise at the Salford Business School, part of the University of Salford. He’s got some knowledge of Saudi Arabia and the Royal Family’s approach to business. He’s not too sure regarding the link to Newcastle United. *** “Have canvassed views of Saudi Arabians I know (in Saudi Arabia) about the proposed country takeover of NUFC. Three common responses: 1) ‘nobody is talking about it here, not an issue’; 2) ‘if it’s true, it’s a private investor, not the government’; 3) ‘no way this will happen’. “Neom, Qiddiya, the Red Sea Project, Saudi Aramco, Uber, Tesla - some of the investments Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund are funding or invested into. Also working closely with Japan’s Softbank & founder Masayoshi Son, which were given $100bn to invest in value-adding assets “Neom to cost $500 billion; Qiddiya likely to cost about the same. Red Sea Project also likely to cost billions. Public Investment Fund’s Uber stake cost £3 billion. And to this hugely valuable, infrastructure & tech focused portfolio, PIF wants to add Newcastle United...!!??!!??” Oh Well Its obvious why they want to buy Newcastle - as proved by Man City its great PR. That's all there is to it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Professor Simon Chadwick is a professor of Sports Enterprise at the Salford Business School, part of the University of Salford. He’s got some knowledge of Saudi Arabia and the Royal Family’s approach to business. He’s not too sure regarding the link to Newcastle United. *** “Have canvassed views of Saudi Arabians I know (in Saudi Arabia) about the proposed country takeover of NUFC. Three common responses: 1) ‘nobody is talking about it here, not an issue’; 2) ‘if it’s true, it’s a private investor, not the government’; 3) ‘no way this will happen’. “Neom, Qiddiya, the Red Sea Project, Saudi Aramco, Uber, Tesla - some of the investments Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund are funding or invested into. Also working closely with Japan’s Softbank & founder Masayoshi Son, which were given $100bn to invest in value-adding assets “Neom to cost $500 billion; Qiddiya likely to cost about the same. Red Sea Project also likely to cost billions. Public Investment Fund’s Uber stake cost £3 billion. And to this hugely valuable, infrastructure & tech focused portfolio, PIF wants to add Newcastle United...!!??!!??” Oh Well If Saudi media isn't reporting anything it might suggest that leaks are water-tight at their end. As we all suspect know anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facundo Ferreyra Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Professor Simon Chadwick is a professor of Sports Enterprise at the Salford Business School, part of the University of Salford. He’s got some knowledge of Saudi Arabia and the Royal Family’s approach to business. He’s not too sure regarding the link to Newcastle United. *** “Have canvassed views of Saudi Arabians I know (in Saudi Arabia) about the proposed country takeover of NUFC. Three common responses: 1) ‘nobody is talking about it here, not an issue’; 2) ‘if it’s true, it’s a private investor, not the government’; 3) ‘no way this will happen’. “Neom, Qiddiya, the Red Sea Project, Saudi Aramco, Uber, Tesla - some of the investments Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund are funding or invested into. Also working closely with Japan’s Softbank & founder Masayoshi Son, which were given $100bn to invest in value-adding assets “Neom to cost $500 billion; Qiddiya likely to cost about the same. Red Sea Project also likely to cost billions. Public Investment Fund’s Uber stake cost £3 billion. And to this hugely valuable, infrastructure & tech focused portfolio, PIF wants to add Newcastle United...!!??!!??” Oh Well If Saudi media isn't reporting anything it might suggest that leaks are water-tight at their end. As well all suspect know anyway. Or they control the media and don't want anything reported in case they end up looking like tits Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now