Stifler Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 This looks a lot more like the prof of funds deposit Ashley wanted, more than anything else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Ok so we all get our hopes up and as in previous takeovers, they are completely dashed at some point by someone who has knowledge of all this. I'm waiting to be disappointed... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Ok so we all get our hopes up and as in previous takeovers, they are completely dashed at some point by someone who has knowledge of all this. I'm waiting to be disappointed... This the most confident I've been about a takeover after seeing these documents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Willing seller this time, this is why it’s different. He wanted out before cv19, he’s fucking desperate now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Willing seller this time, this is why it’s different. He wanted out before cv19, he’s fucking desperate now. Yeap, this doesn't happen without CV19. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny1403 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 I don't think the 150m reference means anything in particular. It's simply a representation relating to the value of the security. This is correct. She isn't depositing £150 million. The proceeds of her ongoing dispute with Barclays have been secured against this loan. She is representing and warranting that those proceeds could be worth, if she's successful, up to £150 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 That’s work fucked, have loads to do... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Lee Ryder shot it down in flames yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 That’s work fucked, have loads to do... Same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facundo Ferreyra Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Lee Ryder shot it down in flames yet? https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/newcastle-united-takeover-documents-indicate-18087625 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 £150m to me reads potentially as an agreement for a future staggered payment - hence the vendor loan agreement with SJH as the lender. Again, hard to gleam too much with access to only one of a multitude of legal documents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 The journalists don’t do themselves any favours like. One of them could have sneaked this as ‘Breaking News’ but instead Joe Public has done what they should and they’ve latched onto it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny1403 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 £150m to me reads potentially as an agreement for a future staggered payment - hence the vendor loan agreement with SJH as the lender. Again, hard to gleam too much with access to only one of a multitude of legal documents. That's not correct - see above. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Knew fuck all until twitter pointed out the CH changes, then it’s now direct sources. This was submitted 6 days ago, sure his direct sources would have said something then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Had on, why's SJH lending to Stavely? Beat me to it....what’s going on here.....any company level specialists fancy commenting on this Yeah that is strange. Deleted my post after a bit more reading - it's a vendor loan, there's not been any cash lent. Looks as if a £13m deposit paid by Staveley to SJH has then been held in ring fenced account by them, hence why they become the lender on the legal docs. Yeah, I can see that £13m deposit. Good news. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Staveley now appointed director at JV1 Limited. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Knew f*** all until twitter pointed out the CH changes, then it’s now direct sources. This was submitted 6 days ago, sure his direct sources would have said something then. Err you know that's how it works? He isn't an investigative journalist - something comes out - they check their source and relay what their told (could still be a load of crap as the source may be wrong). What the else do you expect from a SSN presenter? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Staveley now appointed director at JV1 Limited. John Virgo's involved!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Staveley now appointed director at JV1 Limited. What’s JV1 limited? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny1403 Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Knew fuck all until twitter pointed out the CH changes, then it’s now direct sources. This was submitted 6 days ago, sure his direct sources would have said something then. To be fair, Companies House docs are usually reported as submitted on one date, but don't become available for public viewing until a week or so later. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Knew fuck all until twitter pointed out the CH changes, then it’s now direct sources. This was submitted 6 days ago, sure his direct sources would have said something then. To be fair, Companies House docs are usually reported as submitted on one date, but don't become available for public viewing until a week or so later. Seems like Jonny1403 knows the CH ins and outs here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Knew f*** all until twitter pointed out the CH changes, then it’s now direct sources. This was submitted 6 days ago, sure his direct sources would have said something then. Err you know that's how it works? He isn't an investigative journalist - something comes out - they check their source and relay what their told (could still be a load of crap as the source may be wrong). What the else do you expect from a SSN presenter? You mean he pretends to check his pretend source after something comes out and decides it’s quite believable so hedges his bets. Yup, that’s exactly what I expect from a ssn presenter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Well, well, well. Light at the end of the tunnel then - hopefully! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montey Posted April 14, 2020 Share Posted April 14, 2020 Knew fuck all until twitter pointed out the CH changes, then it’s now direct sources. This was submitted 6 days ago, sure his direct sources would have said something then. To be fair, Companies House docs are usually reported as submitted on one date, but don't become available for public viewing until a week or so later. I think I saw on one document that whilst the Companies House listing date was 9th April (Last Thursday) the certificate issuing date was 14th April (today). If Friday and Monday were Easter public holidays in the UK (as it was here in Australia) then those two days are only 1 work day apart. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts