Jump to content

Callum Wilson: offered 'incentive-based' contract extension (Ornstein)


Recommended Posts

All the folks on Facebook reckoning he'd get 20+ this season, no chance when you know he's guaranteed to miss 10+ games.

 

One of the best strikers we've had in recent times, but only getting into double figures in the PL twice in his career says enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, reefatoon said:

Really like Wilson, but he definitely needs replacing in the summer. Just don't get enough games out of him.

Replace period, or upgrade? I’d rather keep him as a back-up myself, he’s still quality when fit and is a good character. Him and Wood from the bench understudy to one truly top-class CF or if we are greedy, 2, would be real strength in depth we’ve lacked for 14 years or so up front!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the reasons why I thought a striker was the most important signing this window. We did get one, but he's not really a like for like replacement. We need Wilson back for the last dozen or so games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definitely keep him as a backup striker as he’s provided a pretty decent return considering some of the players supplying him with chances. Perhaps more selective game time might increase his longevity and actually make him more effective. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TRon said:

One of the reasons why I thought a striker was the most important signing this window. We did get one, but he's not really a like for like replacement. We need Wilson back for the last dozen or so games.

I just hope not adding another over Wood won’t backfire on us…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
36 minutes ago, HTT II said:

Replace period, or upgrade? I’d rather keep him as a back-up myself, he’s still quality when fit and is a good character. Him and Wood from the bench understudy to one truly top-class CF or if we are greedy, 2, would be real strength in depth we’ve lacked for 14 years or so up front!

 

Replace in the starting line up. We need a striker we can get game time out of. Wilson would be a good player to bring on, but I can't see him being to happy with that role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, HTT II said:

I just hope not adding another over Wood won’t backfire on us…

 

It seems like they tried to hedge their bets by going for Ekitike or Lingard which on top of Wood would have been a decent insurance policy. But with the failure to get either, now the Wood signing looks less smart as a result. We'd probably have been better off going all in on an out and out striker with a bit of pace and power like Zapata.

 

That said, I think signing a decent striker is pretty much impossible in January. Even Wood only came because we activated the release clause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Takes a bit of gloss of the window and everyone’s gripes about not getting another attacking option, have become that bit louder.  
 

They must have had some idea that the injury was going to be a bit longer than 8 weeks? He was still using crutches in Saudi and wasn’t even doing any light training work other than rehab, by Wilson’s own account. 
 

Just makes the failure to get another forward in look 10 times worse now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Alberto2005 said:

Joelinton has to become backup striker now unfortunately.

 

I'd rather shift ASM up tbh. Neither in any way ideal but feels like we'd lose way more than we'd gain by shifting Jo back up there compared to ASM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...