Joe Willock

[Infinitely Content]

5 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

To the Willock thread! Never mind that he was easily our best in the midfield 3 and Bruno and Tonali were both really poor. 

 

 

 

Yes, because his performances are under scrutiny as we await him to show us something to suggest he's good enough to be part of the team going forward. Tonali and Bruno both had individually poor games, but I don't think this is about individual games with Willock anymore. It's probably been approaching 2 years since he performed well and he's now had ample opportunity.

[KaKa]

This man is impossibly clumsy.

 

So infuriating man.

[andycap]

First game in a while starting and he done alright. 

He has attributes that could be vital in the run in. 

So don't knock him. 

[Newcastle Fan]

He's playing like such an Arsenal player at the moment.

[nufc123]

Did alright. Nothing special. We need better in this position going forward

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by nufc123

[Kimbo]

It’s becoming painfully obvious we need a better 4th midfielder. I’d be listening to offers for Willock and Longstaff in the summer.

[Stottie]

Did kind of okay, but needed to at least work the keeper when clean through first half and leave an outstretched trailing leg or get there a bit faster for the incident in the second. The one where he beat the defender for pace second half and then just kicked it out with his wrong foot might have been overlookable for a player up to speed and contributing, but felt incriminating for him as a player who is struggling. 

 

As a midfield, I thought we did okay today and the main issue was our final ball being very poor. Getting in behind but then hitting a cut backs straight to a defender etc. Our key pass man is usually Bruno, and he wasn't on it today either.

[Kid Icarus]

12 minutes ago, Infinitely Content said:

Yes, because his performances are under scrutiny as we await him to show us something to suggest he's good enough to be part of the team going forward. Tonali and Bruno both had individually poor games, but I don't think this is about individual games with Willock anymore. It's probably been approaching 2 years since he performed well and he's now had ample opportunity.

 

The point is that using this match as another example, when everyone was poor, our other midfielders were worse, and Willock wasn't even bad is telling on yourself imo.

 

Had he stood out like a sore thumb it would be fair enough, but he didn't. 

[David Edgar]

Sell him to Saudi for £59m.

[duo]

Just needs a run of games - there's a player in there which we have seen

[nemtizz]

Shame he can't dive properly because he was having a decent game otherwise. Never wanted a player to succeed here more. Will keep rooting him before he's sold

[Infinitely Content]

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

 

The point is that using this match as another example, when everyone was poor, our other midfielders were worse, and Willock wasn't even bad is telling on yourself imo.

 

Had he stood out like a sore thumb it would be fair enough, but he didn't. 

Willock was poor today. I'm not sure what you mean by telling on myself - I don't rate him, I'm not trying to conceal that opinion.

[Lush Vlad]

I thought he was alright first half. Looked much sharper. 

Second half he was really frustrating though.  

[joeyt]

17 minutes ago, andycap said:

First game in a while starting and he done alright. 

He has attributes that could be vital in the run in. 

So don't knock him. 

 

He started the last game

[David Edgar]

Willock cannot be trusted to deliver regularly. We can't wait for him to have his one decent game. We need to move on and sell him.

[Aiston]

I like him and he has proven he can play far better than he currently is. Think the injuries have taken it's toll though.

 

Would sell him and look to sign a creative midfielder.

[Holloway]

Decent is stretching his performance a bit. Was livelier than recent showings in the first half , not much came off for him though. Then his involvement faded until he was replaced. I like him but have always questioned his awareness

[Kid Icarus]

10 minutes ago, Infinitely Content said:

Willock was poor today. I'm not sure what you mean by telling on myself - I don't rate him, I'm not trying to conceal that opinion.

To single out a player who wasn't even the worst player in a midfield including Tonali and Bruno, never mind the full team is telling on yourself for having an obvious agenda. If you think he was poor, that's your opinion but mine would be that that's absolute bollocks.

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Kid Icarus

[Groundhog63]

1 hour ago, Pilko said:

 

People putting a wink face at the end of their post because they haven't got the arsehole to properly call someone out simply don't have an arsehole.

 

I was being kind you wingey, attention seeking arsehole 😉

 

 

Ps usual suspects piling in but, at least, waited until the final whistle 😉😉

[Ginola]

He's an excellent athlete, he's not a good footballer

[Infinitely Content]

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

To single out a player who wasn't even the worst player in a midfield including Tonali and Bruno, never mind the full team is telling on yourself for having an obvious agenda. If you think he was poor, that's your opinion but mine would be that that's absolute bollocks.

 

 

 

Again, I don't think anyone is singling him out based on one performance, it's that over a long period of time he hasn't done enough when given the opportunity, so I and apparently many others are looking keenly at his contribution. I don't think he contributed much of note to the game today and looked his usual frustrating, haphazard self. More of the same Willock we've seen for a while now. Whether or not he was better than Bruno and Tonali is irrelevant to me.

[Yorkie]

He's got one particularly strong weapon in his arsenal and that's bolting past someone on the left flank and getting to the byline. He did that once today then kicked it out of play. Being kind, I think that was as big an indicator of rustiness that we've seen. It's frustrating because we can't really accommodate rustiness at this point. 

 

Definitely accept that his fellow midfielders were poor as well but in think Howe's gambling a bit with Willock, in the hope he plays himself back into form. Feels like we've invested that time now so might as well stick with it to see if it pays off. It worked for him earlier with Pope being preferred to Dubs when the optics indicated the latter would be better. Same might also be said for Wilson over Osula.

[Menace]

We need a team in Saudi to do us a favour, he cost us £28M. Smith Rowe cost Fulham about that much, I'd be looking at £30M+ from a Saudi team this summer tbh.

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Menace

[Barnes23]

Don't think he would want to go to SA at all honestly. Could see a West Ham or Fulham taking a chance on him - maybe. 

 

I feel for him as he is a better player than he's shown lately. Out of form and without regular game time a move might be best for all parties. Understand those who would keep him for depth, though. 

[Kid Icarus]

6 minutes ago, Infinitely Content said:

Again, I don't think anyone is singling him out based on one performance, it's that over a long period of time he hasn't done enough when given the opportunity, so I and apparently many others are looking keenly at his contribution. I don't think he contributed much of note to the game today and looked his usual frustrating, haphazard self. More of the same Willock we've seen for a while now. Whether or not he was better than Bruno and Tonali is irrelevant to me.

Proving the point I'm making AFAIC