Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

Problem is a CAT case could be a very long way down the line and the majority of news has reported that PIF won’t wait that long.

 

I agree, I don't think winning the CAT case is likely to be a route to the takeover because it will take too long.

 

But if it's true that the PL have lost the jurisdiction challenge it puts a lot of pressure on them to settle before arbitration, because that is their only way out. If they don't take that chance to get out now they could be in the shit irrespective of the outcome of the arbitration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said:

I heard from someone ages ago and I did mention on here that the consortium, if back at the table would be minus Staveley. 

 

I've seen that posted by someone else too, but her husbands continued interest in NUFC on twitter doesn't really make much sense if that's the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

I agree, I don't think winning the CAT case is likely to be a route to the takeover because it will take too long.

 

But if it's true that the PL have lost the jurisdiction challenge it puts a lot of pressure on them to settle before arbitration, because that is their only way out. If they don't take that chance to get out now they could be in the shit irrespective of the outcome of the arbitration.

Exactly, if CAT accept jurisdiction and we lose arbitration it doesn’t matter how far down the line the Tribunal is Ashley will want his revenge. The CAT ruling if it goes in his favour will be massive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

MOTT blocked me on twitter, the only reason I can think of was a veiled comment related to him that he didn't mention his accounts or name directly and he wasn't tagged into. He must spend every waking hour on twitter searching for people to block :idiot2:

Aye blocked me too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any likelihood that we will be able to see the evidence submitted by the PL which outlines their argument for why it shouldn't go to CAT? Presume not, given we're ten days past their deadline to submit? 

 

Will some form of communication come out from CAT, stipulating either: "we reject the PL's argument, CAT will proceed," or "we accept the PL's argument, off you fuck to arbitration."? 

 

Or are we just gonna sit here in the default and super-fun position of not knowing wtf's going on forever more? 

 

@B-more Mag sorry for tagging you again. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr Jinx said:

I heard from someone ages ago and I did mention on here that the consortium, if back at the table would be minus Staveley. 

I want Staveley involved, PIF are going to be pretty hands off and I think she'd be a really good go between for them and the club/fans. We'd still need a really sharp football guy but there has to be a role for her in the new era

 

(plus she likes Rafa)

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Is there any likelihood that we will be able to see the evidence submitted by the PL which outlines their argument for why it shouldn't go to CAT? Presume not, given we're ten days past their deadline to submit? 

 

Will some form of communication come out from CAT, stipulating either: "we reject the PL's argument, CAT will proceed," or "we accept the PL's argument, off you fuck to arbitration."? 

 

Or are we just gonna sit here in the default and super-fun position of not knowing wtf's going on forever more? 

 

@B-more Mag sorry for tagging you again. :lol:

 

The CAT process is very transparent, pretty much everything that isn't confidential is posted on their website and they even broadcast their hearings. We will know what is going on in a lot of detail, although the updating of the website might be a little behind the actual events.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wandy said:

I'd imagine the pay-off would be getting the full £340m through the takeover being passed, together with the PL covering any losses, for example covering the cost of a reduced takeover price together with any loss of business revenue, ie deals that he had set up etc.

 

I'd love to know where the PL would find ~£400m from. I doubt that they have insurance to cover that.

Probably from the TV revenues.  It would mean the prize money for final table positions at the end of 21/22 season will be drastically reduced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said:

 

The CAT process is very transparent, pretty much everything that isn't confidential is posted on their website and they even broadcast their hearings. We will know what is going on in a lot of detail, although the updating of the website might be a little behind the actual events.

 

Cheers, Jackie. :thup:  Seems feasible that we should get an update at some point this month, then. That said, fuck knows how quickly they get through their admin. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yorkie said:

Is there any likelihood that we will be able to see the evidence submitted by the PL which outlines their argument for why it shouldn't go to CAT? Presume not, given we're ten days past their deadline to submit? 

 

Will some form of communication come out from CAT, stipulating either: "we reject the PL's argument, CAT will proceed," or "we accept the PL's argument, off you fuck to arbitration."? 

 

Or are we just gonna sit here in the default and super-fun position of not knowing wtf's going on forever more? 

 

@B-more Mag sorry for tagging you again. :lol:

 

It looks like the CAT doesn't post the parties' written filings (at least I haven't seen any in any of the cases that I've pulled up where it has entered a ruling based, at least in part, on what would have been written submissions), but as @Jackie Broon points out, as far as hearings go, the CAT is very transparent (you can watch hearings and hearing transcripts are posted). The CAT's decision on the PL's challenge of the CAT's jurisdiction will be filed at some point, and that should give us a fairly good idea of what the PL submitted and what, if anything, Ashley's company submitted or submits. I'm a bit skeptical of the rumors that the CAT has already decided, as the CAT's guidance on the CAT rules says: "Any application to dispute the jurisdiction will usually be set down for oral hearing by a Chairman sitting alone." But "usually" doesn't mean "always", so maybe/hopefully this is an exception.

 

 

Edited by B-more Mag

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

Cheers, Jackie. :thup:  Seems feasible that we should get an update at some point this month, then. That said, fuck knows how quickly they get through their admin. 

 

 

They seem pretty quick with their admin, I'd expect some sort of update this week, either a judgement (if the rumours are true) or a date for the hearing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...