et tu brute Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 1 minute ago, mighty__mag said: Less hassle. bollocks man you don’t pay millions in legal fees for less hassle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 7 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Has a jurisdiction hearing been confirmed? Not yet (at least not on the CAT website yet). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 (edited) 3 hours ago, Whitley mag said: Where not at the point whereby they’d give in yet. If the CAT case is given the go ahead, that’s when it gets interesting. Really now? Now the W.A.I.T is for the stage where they say 'ah ok, we give in'? Didn't hear this scenario 2 3 weeks back. All the bollocks I was rrading from Keith and all the supposed ITKs were the PL will give in. Quoting you on this one. Funny that you're not confident saying they'll give in, instead, just saying it'll get interesting. Edited June 30, 2021 by nufcjb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 13 minutes ago, et tu brute said: bollocks man you don’t pay millions in legal fees for less hassle. We're talking about a guy who is constantly in legal challenges all the time. It's not new to him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 1 minute ago, mighty__mag said: We're talking about a guy who is constantly in legal challenges all the time. It's not new to him. He still wouldn’t do a case costing millions to avoid the hassle though . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 1 minute ago, et tu brute said: He still wouldn’t do a case costing millions to avoid the hassle though . They all cost millions when millions are involved?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 1 minute ago, mighty__mag said: They all cost millions when millions are involved?? Not to just stop avoiding hassle. That is just tin foil hat theory that. You want to believe that go for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 9 minutes ago, et tu brute said: Not to just stop avoiding hassle. That is just tin foil hat theory that. You want to believe that go for it. Maybe I'm treating ADR as a big boys PayPal dispute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 (edited) 35 minutes ago, nufcjb said: Really now? Now the W.A.I.T is for the stage where they say 'ah ok, we give in'? Didn't hear this scenario 2 3 weeks back. All the bollocks I was rrading from Keith and all the supposed ITKs were the PL will give in. Quoting you on this one. Funny that you're not confident saying they'll give in, instead, just saying it'll get interesting. Keith has always said they’d fight to get case thrown out it’s what bird and bird do. What he said was that when disclosure comes they’ll fold like a pack of cards. Think you’ve jumped the gun a bit based on Ryder’s article. Quote me away. Yeah I believe it’ll get interesting if case is given go ahead. Do I know they’ll fold for certain course I don’t, but i would hazard a guess it’ll greatly increase the chances of a settlement during arbitration if it gets go ahead. Edited June 30, 2021 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 2 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: Keith has always said they’d fight to get case thrown out it’s what bird and bird do. What he said was that when disclosure comes they’ll fold like a pack of cards. Think you’ve jumped the gun a bit based on Ryder’s article. Quote me away. Yeah I believe it’ll get interesting if case is given go ahead. Do I know they’ll fold for certain course I don’t, but i would hazard a guess it’ll greatly increase the chances of a settlement during arbitration if it gets go ahead. You found your missing 1% yet mate? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 2 minutes ago, Shearergol said: You found your missing 1% yet mate? Yawn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 Maybe, if this action does turn out to be about recovering losses, and Ashley wins, maybe he reduces the asking price? Facilitating a new takeover. Yeah yeah... I know Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 How can the CAT case be solely damages when one of the seeking points was "An injunction requiring the Defendant to withdraw the Director Decision and/or to reconsider the same" (the director decision provisionally being PIF = KSA) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 As for PL arbitration that applies section A's definitions of control and person on PIF and the KSA to determine whether the PL were right to provisionally conclude what they did. In my head the idea is to overturn that which facilitates an easier pathway to takeover from Staveley's group. If it all fails fine we'll have alternatives. But none have managed to get anywhere near in the 4 years (more like 3.5) the club has been for sale Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 10 minutes ago, nbthree3 said: How can the CAT case be solely damages when one of the seeking points was "An injunction requiring the Defendant to withdraw the Director Decision and/or to reconsider the same" (the director decision provisionally being PIF = KSA) Staveley even said not long ago that she can’t speak about Newcastle due to NDA’s. She isn’t going to be tied into anything like that just so Mike can get a bit extra cash. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 When fans don't hear an update in a while the pessimism comes in, obviously because uncertainties arise and confidence falls as we're more privy to those worries. But materially little changes unless something is made public about it, at some unknown point in the future Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 Nail in coffin? Last straws being grasped? Who’s the next manager us deluded fools are thinking is waiting for the glorious takeover? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 I find it interesting that people (Keith and his following of minions) keep talking about the delay tactics of the PL, when NUFC delayed arbitration by 3-6 months by failing to remove the chair of the independent panel. NUFC could also have lodged the CAT case much sooner then they did. We could’ve had a decision/closure by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 Speaking of minions, 9 minutes in and Joey hasn’t like that yet. You upset him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 Just now, reefatoon said: Speaking of minions, 9 minutes in and Joey hasn’t like that yet. You upset him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 1 minute ago, Fantail Breeze said: Or have you forgot your password for your Joey account? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 (edited) Did that cause a significant delay or was it part of the process? Genuine question. Don't remember seeing it reported that way but could be wrong. Bit of a strange equivocation either way mind. Edited June 30, 2021 by TheHoob Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 1 minute ago, TheHoob said: Did that cause a significant delay or was it part of the process? Genuine question. Don't remember seeing it reported that way but could be wrong. Bit of a strange equivocation either way mind. It was only part of the process because we wanted it to be. It was reported at the time to have taken 3-6 months to resolve. If we didn’t challenge it and just proceeded, we’d have gone through arbitration by now. NUFC’s right to challenge that is no different to the PL’s right to challenge CAT’s jurisdiction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awaymag Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 Wankers! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 (edited) Yeah it caused a delay (if you’re talking about challenging the chair of the arbitration panel) but it was a risk they had to take. The fella pretty much designed the Owners and Directors test. They couldn’t just not try to have him removed. What it also does though, even though it wasn’t successful, is to put the spotlight on him a lot more and he’s going to have to be squeaky clean throughout the whole process and not be obviously biased towards the PL. I think it was a ridiculous decision not to remove him. Talk about a clear conflict of interest. Edited June 30, 2021 by LV Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts