Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The logic of this argument seems a bit flawed IMO. Being bound by only FA rules because you're 'close to the playing of the sport' surely can't hold up when you're talking about sale and purchase of £350m companies and those transactions being blocked for commercial reasons. Can't see how sporting body rules can hold up to that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 29/09/2021 at 11:53, AyeDubbleYoo said:

The logic of this argument seems a bit flawed IMO. Being bound by only FA rules because you're 'close to the playing of the sport' surely can't hold up when you're talking about sale and purchase of £350m companies and those transactions being blocked for commercial reasons. Can't see how sporting body rules can hold up to that. 

Expand  

Absolutely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a typical technical meeting that goes on for 5 hours+, where no one pays any attention barring the 10-15 minutes where they have to speak.

Guarantee the judge has lost interest by now and has already made decision, but just going through procedure of letting all parties say their piece

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...