PauloGeordio Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 1 minute ago, GeordieDazzler said: Newcastle should be rightly punished for the rules they haven’t broken. This! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 Why would Brighton and Bournemouth not want this btw? Weird they vote against it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 4 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Why would Brighton and Bournemouth not want this btw? Weird they vote against it? And why would Saudi owned Sheffield United vote with us ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 4 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Why would Brighton and Bournemouth not want this btw? Weird they vote against it? Brown envelopes from LFC, Man U, Spuds and Arsenal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrRaspberryJam Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 2 hours ago, MrRaspberryJam said: Arsenal — Colorado Rapids (U.S.) Aston Villa — Vitoria Guimaraes (Portugal) Bournemouth — Lorient (France) Brighton & Hove Albion — Union Saint-Gilloise (Belgium) Chelsea — Strasbourg (France) Crystal Palace — Botafogo (Brazil), Lyon (France), RWD Molenbeek (Belgium), AD Alcorcon (Spain), ADO Den Haag (Netherlands), FC Augsburg (Germany), Real Salt Lake (U.S.), Waasland-Beveren (Belgium) Manchester City — Bahia (Brazil), Girona (Spain), Lommel SK (Belgium), Melbourne City (Australia), Montevideo City Torque (Uruguay), Mumbai City (India), New York City FC (U.S.), Palermo (Italy), Sichuan Jiuniu (China), Troyes AC (France), Yokohama F Marinos (Japan) Newcastle United — Al Ahli, Al Ittihad, Al Hilal and Al Nassr (all Saudi Arabia) Nottingham Forest — Olympiacos (Greece) Sheffield United — Al Hilal United (UAE), Beerschot VA (Belgium), Kerala United (India), LB Chateauroux (France) West Ham United — Sparta Prague (Czech Republic) Crystal Palace should really be exploiting Botafogo and Lyon like (maybe not now as they’re total garbage). Could cherry pick their younger starlets who want a move to London/PL and sell on for a quick profit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 16 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Why would Brighton and Bournemouth not want this btw? Weird they vote against it? Bournemouth are American owned I think so that could be why they voted in favour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 17 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Why would Brighton and Bournemouth not want this btw? Weird they vote against it? This was just a temporary ban. If they have no intention of moving players between their clubs in January they may as well vote in favour to stifle us short-term then see how things are leading up to the summer window. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 22 minutes ago, Infatuation Junkie said: Someone explain to a backwards person like me so as I know if we are in a bettor or worse position than this time yesterday with this news Well it's no worse. Basically they voted on a proposal that would have stopped us loaning players from PIF-owned clubs in January but that proposal was not passed. So if we wanted to loan Neves (for example) there's nothing stopping us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 People on about why would these teams block it, have any of them ever used a loan from the club they are linked with? I can only think of Lampard going to City off the top of my head must be more though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 (edited) I love how some clubs are annoyed at Sheffield United because of their Saudi owners. Regardless of who owns them they are entitled to vote whatever way they want. Infact, they could easily be using their Saudi links to dip into that league as well but no one wants to mention them because the entire thing is driven by some of top 6 clubs who are only interested in us closing the gap on them, something they know the likes of Sheffield United have no intention of doing. Edited November 21, 2023 by Decky Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 Sheff Ute’s owner is Saudi right? Do they have ties to any other club or are they just currying favour with us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 22 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Why would Brighton and Bournemouth not want this btw? Weird they vote against it? Brighton send their players outwards to get experience. They don’t loan in from their partner clubs. Understand the proposed ban was inwards only.Not sure about Bournemouth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 3 minutes ago, SAK said: Brighton send their players outwards to get experience. They don’t loan in from their partner clubs. Understand the proposed ban was inwards only.Not sure about Bournemouth. So they're voting against a rule that they themselves exploit in Belgium? They can get to fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 42 minutes ago, Paully said: https://x.com/martynziegler/status/1727041274987807230?s=46&t=FsEm6VC2ijNnTjHjyXU7DA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 (edited) I was of the opinion we probably shouldn't get involved in these loans because it is shite optics, but fuck these cunts. Doing everything they can think of to stop us, we should shithouse to the max. Edited November 21, 2023 by TheHoob Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 2 minutes ago, TheHoob said: I was of the opinion we probably shouldn't get involved in these loans because it is shite optics, but fuck these cunts. Doing everything they can think of to stop us, we should shithouse to the max. Absolutely. If it’s in the rules who gives a fuck how it looks or what they think! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 Which club’s top 4 place do we want to take the most. Liverpool for me personally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 Got a feeling this will be like the 5 subs rule. They'll just continue to put it up for a vote until it eventually passes and then that'll be that. They'll wait until Sheff U go down and try again and it'll (probably rightly) pass. It's a rule that could benefit us in the short term but it's not great for the game in general just moving players around a group of owned clubs on a whim, Watford/Udinese have taken the piss recently - not broken any rules but it's not 'right' imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 Fuck off you whingeing scouse cunt, the voting was always tailored so the big 6 could veto anything they didn’t want boo fucking hoo. https://x.com/Carra23/status/1727019724771655966?s=20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 1 minute ago, Hudson said: Which club’s top 4 place do we want to take the most. Liverpool for me personally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 1 minute ago, Whitley mag said: Fuck off you whingeing scouse cunt, the voting was always tailored so the big 6 could veto anything they didn’t want boo fucking hoo. https://x.com/Carra23/status/1727019724771655966?s=20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 Just now, midds said: Got a feeling this will be like the 5 subs rule. They'll just continue to put it up for a vote until it eventually passes and then that'll be that. They'll wait until Sheff U go down and try again and it'll (probably rightly) pass. It's a rule that could benefit us in the short term but it's not great for the game in general just moving players around a group of owned clubs on a whim, Watford/Udinese have taken the piss recently - not broken any rules but it's not 'right' imo Totally agree, and I’m sure there will guidelines inserted between now and next season. But fuck it take the piss while we can, 2 season loans with 30% wages payed by us. Fuck FFP, Fuck The premier league entitled boys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 Palace fans have a meltdown that Parish voted for the block. They are right. He’s more concerned with stopping us than trying to raise his club up. Fans annoyed that their multi club model seems to be a sham - based on the vote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 3 minutes ago, midds said: Got a feeling this will be like the 5 subs rule. They'll just continue to put it up for a vote until it eventually passes and then that'll be that. They'll wait until Sheff U go down and try again and it'll (probably rightly) pass. It's a rule that could benefit us in the short term but it's not great for the game in general just moving players around a group of owned clubs on a whim, Watford/Udinese have taken the piss recently - not broken any rules but it's not 'right' imo Yeah but our injuries aren’t right. When needs must! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaqen Posted November 21, 2023 Share Posted November 21, 2023 I mean it's quite ridiculous and funny that we aren't allowed to spend £50m on Neves if we wanted to because that would break FFP rules but we are allowed to just use the Saudi connection and loan a £50m player for free. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now