Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just because we know we need more revenue it doesn't mean we can't scrutinise what does get agreed.

 

NFTs are invariably a load of shite and I can't envisage it's even a needle mover as far as revenue goes considering people already stopped giving a shit about them a few years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said:

Am I missing something?

what’s the issue with more income / another commercial partner ?

 

I have no interest in monster energy drinks but they are one of our sponsors ?

 

All adds to FFP ?

There is a common belief that you are paying for nothing. Despite what people think, you don’t gain ownership of anything, you just get your name put in an electronic ledger. It’s very similar to the name a star schemes you get. You don’t actually get to name a star.

 

 

Edited by Stifler

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

As much as I don't like the guy, he does potentially have a point :lol:

Fuck him. Free market and that

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

As much as I don't like the guy, he does potentially have a point :lol:

How?

The club and Adidas are free to supply who they like?

Adidas had a similar run in with Sports Direct some years back because they thought selling shirts through them gave them a bad look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't care less if he has a point or if we're being petty. The facts of the dispute are irrelevant. In fact I hope we're conspiring with Adidas against him and that it all feels very unfair. His 14 years of ownership felt unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...