TheBrownBottle Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 21 minutes ago, r0cafella said: https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html we are 17th in the latest money league rankings, Frankfurt having double our commercial revenue blew me away. we’ve still got so much to do. We’re miles away at present. It’s why I couldn’t get over excited about how improved we were doing commercially - a team of first year marketing students could have increased Ashley’s commercials at NUFC. Given the disparity in incomes between the NE and the rest of the country (particularly London), I don’t think we’re getting to where we want to go at SJP. We would need a 70k ground with shitloads of corporate to compete long term, plus commercials on everything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 37 minutes ago, r0cafella said: https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html we are 17th in the latest money league rankings, Frankfurt having double our commercial revenue blew me away. we’ve still got so much to do. We’re rich! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Jack27 said: We’re rich! We always were until latter-day Ashley. We’ve been on the Deloitte Rich List more times than all but 12 clubs despite that fucker. A few more times than Man City. Edited January 25 by TheBrownBottle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, r0cafella said: https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html we are 17th in the latest money league rankings, Frankfurt having double our commercial revenue blew me away. we’ve still got so much to do. Do we have an official Sand sponsorship yet, I imagine that could bring a few quid in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRL Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 This was 22-23, with champions league and Sela I imagine it will jump again for 23-24, then the Adidas deal and more commercials should see us tick up again in 24-25 despite lack of CL footie next season. It’s going to take time to pull ourselves up with revenue streams but going in right direction. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 21 hours ago, timeEd32 said: This is what we're up against: https://en.psg.fr/fans/official-stores Stores in London, NYC (on 5th Avenue), LA, Vegas, Miami, Toronto, Tokyo (x3), Doha, Seoul, and more. The first time I walked past the store on Oxford St (or wherever it is in the West End) I actually laughed out loud. Had no idea. Now I see the ads everywhere on the Tube. Broken Britain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 3 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said: We always were rich, until latter-day Ashley. We’ve been on the Deloitte Rich List more times than all but 12 clubs despite that fucker. A few more times than Man City. Yes indeed, for example in 1998 . . . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 17 minutes ago, leffe186 said: The first time I walked past the store on Oxford St (or wherever it is in the West End) I actually laughed out loud. Had no idea. Now I see the ads everywhere on the Tube. Broken Britain. In all fairness I think it’s the only place in the U.K. that you could get away with it. Lots of tourists, in an area where no club has claimed territory etc. I don’t think it would last long elsewhere in the U.K., even Manchester. Well maybe Belfast aside as they have Liverpool, Man Utd, Celtic, and Rangers club stores, and have no real big club of their own. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 49 minutes ago, Stifler said: In all fairness I think it’s the only place in the U.K. that you could get away with it. Lots of tourists, in an area where no club has claimed territory etc. I don’t think it would last long elsewhere in the U.K., even Manchester. Well maybe Belfast aside as they have Liverpool, Man Utd, Celtic, and Rangers club stores, and have no real big club of their own. Don’t think it will last long here tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68086979 Discussion on our situation on BBC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 hour ago, manorpark said: Yes indeed, for example in 1998 . . . Yet we're being told we have to thank Ashley for his frugality as it has allowed us to spend. Clueless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Just now, RS said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68086979 Discussion on our situation on BBC Presumably they have a way to make a profit on Isak? As of this summer hes still £40m on our books and cant think too many clubs have the money to pay more than what we paid right now let alone what we would actually want to make it even semi worthwhile Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 minute ago, Fezzle said: Presumably they have a way to make a profit on Isak? As of this summer hes still £40m on our books and cant think too many clubs have the money to pay more than what we paid right now let alone what we would actually want to make it even semi worthwhile We’re not selling Isak for anything less than £100m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 23 minutes ago, duo said: Yet we're being told we have to thank Ashley for his frugality as it has allowed us to spend. Clueless. Anyone who says that has no idea what they are talking about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 19 minutes ago, nufcnick said: We’re not selling Isak for anything less than £100m There you go then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 28 minutes ago, Fezzle said: Presumably they have a way to make a profit on Isak? As of this summer hes still £40m on our books and cant think too many clubs have the money to pay more than what we paid right now let alone what we would actually want to make it even semi worthwhile Not happening unless he has a specific clause in place. Bruno, Botman will go before him because he’s the hardest position to replace and seems to be tracking to 20+ goals a season now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 5 minutes ago, Nucasol said: Not happening unless he has a specific clause in place. Bruno, Botman will go before him because he’s the hardest position to replace and seems to be tracking to 20+ goals a season now. Exactly this, he will be a 20+ striker as soon as we have a player to replace him at the 60/70 minute mark consistently in games, that’s the biggest problem with Wilson, he’s not happy as a backup or 30min player and his teddy comes out of the pram, but his body won’t allow him to do any more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 1 minute ago, nufcnick said: Exactly this, he will be a 20+ striker as soon as we have a player to replace him at the 60/70 minute mark consistently in games, that’s the biggest problem with Wilson, he’s not happy as a backup or 30min player and his teddy comes out of the pram, but his body won’t allow him to do any more. He’s basically a good candidate for a non-European football club. Gets his full of minutes, someone like a Palace would be ideal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 48 minutes ago, duo said: Yet we're being told we have to thank Ashley for his frugality as it has allowed us to spend. Clueless. Yay thank you so much for not spending any money for three years so our new owners could use it, Mr Ashley. Any chance we could make use of the previous ten years unused budget, too? No? That's not fair play? Okay. Makes sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 22 minutes ago, Nucasol said: Not happening unless he has a specific clause in place. Bruno, Botman will go before him because he’s the hardest position to replace and seems to be tracking to 20+ goals a season now. Sorry my sarcasm at the bbc article got lost Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Birmingham have just got a stadium sponsor 10m per year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 13 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Birmingham have just got a stadium sponsor 10m per year It's also the training ground, entertainment zone, and dependent on whatever the hell these performance bonuses are based on: The club’s Wast Hills training ground will be renamed The Knighthead Training and Academy Grounds. A new fan ‘entertainment zone’ @ Knighthead Park, will be built, situated on club-owned land close to the Tilton and Main Stand at the Stadium. The deal is based on an annual sponsorship fee, a Men’s First Team performance-related bonus and a Club wide social media performance-related bonus which could deliver £6,241,666.67 for the remainder of the season and £9,450,000 for the 2024/25 season. Knighthead will also receive physical and digital branding rights across the stadium, training grounds and all club-owned channel Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 4 hours ago, timeEd32 said: It's also the training ground, entertainment zone, and dependent on whatever the hell these performance bonuses are based on: The club’s Wast Hills training ground will be renamed The Knighthead Training and Academy Grounds. A new fan ‘entertainment zone’ @ Knighthead Park, will be built, situated on club-owned land close to the Tilton and Main Stand at the Stadium. The deal is based on an annual sponsorship fee, a Men’s First Team performance-related bonus and a Club wide social media performance-related bonus which could deliver £6,241,666.67 for the remainder of the season and £9,450,000 for the 2024/25 season. Knighthead will also receive physical and digital branding rights across the stadium, training grounds and all club-owned channel It’s more than we’re bringing in, even if the structure is opaque. No reason that we couldn’t shove Brum’s deal down the PL’s throat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 4 hours ago, timeEd32 said: It's also the training ground, entertainment zone, and dependent on whatever the hell these performance bonuses are based on: The club’s Wast Hills training ground will be renamed The Knighthead Training and Academy Grounds. A new fan ‘entertainment zone’ @ Knighthead Park, will be built, situated on club-owned land close to the Tilton and Main Stand at the Stadium. The deal is based on an annual sponsorship fee, a Men’s First Team performance-related bonus and a Club wide social media performance-related bonus which could deliver £6,241,666.67 for the remainder of the season and £9,450,000 for the 2024/25 season. Knighthead will also receive physical and digital branding rights across the stadium, training grounds and all club-owned channel Surprised we haven’t absolutely gone to town on the club owned channel and digital content side of things. Seems such an easy money maker across the globe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 It does feel like with the current owners apparent inaction is ‘part of the plan / process’, with absolutely no evidence to support that it is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now