Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, snakzz said:

Would take both maddison and barnes. Either one would improve us alot. 
 

But maddison is more like Paqueta and would pick Paqueta over Maddison. Will prolly come cheaper to. 

 

 

 

Agree with this 100%

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maddison would improve us immeasurably. I can’t see Leicester selling mind. I can’t see him going for it either given he’s been on the verge of a Champions League move for a while. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If true, the fact that he’s allegedly keen and only has two years on his contract definitely works in our favour. 
 

Doesn’t sign a new contract and they get substantially less than £40m next year or nothing in two years. And sounds like that isn’t really a viable option for them in their current financial situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
1 minute ago, Yorkie said:

 

Hmm, wondering which of his legs we've bid for with that figure.


That just about covers his constant dives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteV said:

If true, the fact that he’s allegedly keen and only has two years on his contract definitely works in our favour. 
 

Doesn’t sign a new contract and they get substantially less than £40m next year or nothing in two years. And sounds like that isn’t really a viable option for them in their current financial situation.

The issue is a bloated squad and wages. Next summer we have loads of dross out of contract and it frees up huge amounts of cash. It’s a short term issue. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II

He’s a very very good player, but he’s not a player we need right now IMO. I’d much prefer the more dynamic Paqueta, who can play the 10 but other roles and positions too. And he’d cost less you’d imagine!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Geordie Magpie said:

The article says he's interested in the move. Really hope we do up the offer like, do wonder if we did this deal, whether we would still go for a winger?

The article does not say he’s interested.
 

A NE reporter said it was “thought” he was keen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, STM said:

Maddison can play on the wing, I think that is the whole point.

Correction, we’ve played him on the wing. Whether he’s any good there is rather debatable, few Leicester fans ever want him out there as he’s not a winger. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxedup said:

Correction, we’ve played him on the wing. Whether he’s any good there is rather debatable, few Leicester fans ever want him out there as he’s not a winger. 

Would you have Paqueta as his replacement that is the question

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, HTT II said:

He’s a very very good player, but he’s not a player we need right now IMO. I’d much prefer the more dynamic Paqueta, who can play the 10 but other roles and positions too. And he’d cost less you’d imagine!


I agree with you but I’m also very content with whatever moves they make to be honest. They clearly do their homework and look at all factors unlike the shambles under Ashley. If they think x player fits the bill then so be it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we Are interested in Maddison its just plain stupid to skip Paqueta tbh. 
 

Alot cheaper, best bud with bruno and I think bigger potentional. 

 

 

Edited by snakzz

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is true, we could be signing him to play as a wide playmaker. Quite a big tactic in preseason has been 2 of the midfield 3 overlapping wingers on the outside and the wingers moving in, as well as having support from full backs.

 

Alternatively, he could form that final piece of the midfield 3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maddison puts up Paqueta-like numbers in a harder league. Paqueta is more of a unit and would add slightly more defensively.

 

For Maddison himself, he probably needs to move if he wants to play for England. Maybe Howe can sell him us as a platform to take him higher. As it is, he's well behind Mount with Bellingham getting established too.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...