Jump to content

Chris Wood (now playing for Nottingham Forest)


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Wolfcastle said:

Serves absolutely no purpose unless there's an incoming.  Can't believe we'd be putting our trust in a not yet fully returned Isak and injury prone Wilson at this point.

 

You see, I hope it's because we're replacing him with a decent player, but honestly we might just be better off without him :lol: Wood offered nowt. At this point I'd prefer to try ASM up front as a third choice. Or Willock. Or Schar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the deal comes off, good luck to him - will wish him nothing but the best and hope he scores goals and enjoys himself. Smashing person, joined us when we needed him and he grafted every bit of him on the pitch to keep us up. Will forever respect and admire him for that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

Wow. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

This is incredible :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

Insane take

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form and he isn't good enough to build our whole team around. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

 

 

What have we become.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JumpersForGoalposts said:

Honestly wouldn't want him. His style doesn't fit ours at all in any way, shape or form and he isn't good enough to build our whole team around. Kane plays as a traditional 10, minus the forward runs onto through balls almost flatly refusing to tie up the opposition defence. To play him, we would need to be comfortable that Miggy and the other winger wouldn't have anyone ahead of them and that Bruno and Jur would have to be careful that they didn't bump onto him during the build up phase.

 

I can't see him adopting the press either, and I'd imagine that he'd sulk being surrounded by other players that the fans love more than him. I'd much rather we brought a proper 9 (not necessarily a target man) that gave the midfield something to work with. 

 

No thank you.

 

 

 

Sensational 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...