Bruno Guimarães

[Guest]

Just threw in a bid. going to have the best 5-a-side team.

[Fezzle]

2 hours ago, rutland said:

If he isnt sold then our purchasing budget drops a lot surely.

Rather do without 

[Gawalls]

1 hour ago, Jackie Broon said:

As a dyslexic person whoes language processing is a bit slow readng the new thread title was a propper rollercoaster of emotions, I read it as '£100M release clause activated' at first glance, then had a wave of relieif as I realised it was about it expiring, then a wave of anxiety at having to wait until midnight for it to expire 

 

 

 

Always wondered why give dyslexic people such a hard word to spell, why not swap it with flu?

[Mattoon]

Was it ever in doubt? He's home, why would he leave?

[Fezzle]

2 minutes ago, Mattoon said:

Was it ever in doubt? He's home, why would he leave?

This. Fuck the 4 points and I'd be happy if Amanda flicked the v's at them while they did it. Shit rules destroying the league 

[Mike]

2 hours ago, Deuce said:

Get those [release clause expiration] baths ready, lads

 

You jest, but...

[Away Toon]

Auteur d’une bonne saison avec Newcastle United, Bruno Guimarães pourrait partir durant ce mercato estival. Lors de son transfert en 2022, l’OL avait réussi à négocier un intéressement de 20 % sur une éventuelle plus-value.

[Away Toon]

Hadn't heard that before.

[duo]

Does this release clause kick in again next summer?

[PauloGeordio]

2 minutes ago, duo said:

Does this release clause kick in again next summer?

Enough now 

[Colos Short and Curlies]

1 hour ago, Gawalls said:

Always wondered why give dyslexic people such a hard word to spell, why not swap it with flu?

Just try asking someone with a stammer to say it.

 

or even just a general speech impediment.

 

and like any kid with ADHD is going to get through saying that from start to finish 

[Dokko]

13 minutes ago, duo said:

Does this release clause kick in again next summer?

 

Every window, so twice a year.

[PauloGeordio]

That’s ready to go and play football  again 🖤🤍

[sushimonster85]

1 hour ago, Dokko said:

 

Every window, so twice a year.

 

Aye, but incredibly unlikely anyone drops 100m in Jan. If we don't get CL football I fully expect him to leave next Summer. And wouldn't begrudge the lad at that point. Genuinely one of the best in the world in his position and will be 27 by then. It would be time.

 

Now if we get CL I could honestly see him wanting to stay here the rest of his career. Or at least till he goes back to retire in Brazil.

[Nobody]

Well it's past midnight in Sweden now

[Jaqen]

Everyone is celebrating but it's much more likely if he goes that we'd sell him under the £100m clause IMO. 

[Nobody]

1 minute ago, Jaqen said:

Everyone is celebrating but it's much more likely if he goes that we'd sell him under the £100m clause IMO. 

Dont think he wants to leave, and we wouldn't well him for less than the clause anyway. Him and Isak are our crown jewels, it will be very hard for anyone to convince us to sell either of them

[mighty__mag]

7 minutes ago, Jaqen said:

Everyone is celebrating but it's much more likely if he goes that we'd sell him under the £100m clause IMO. 

 

Yes and if he was sold for let's say 60m then to me it just proves the club intended to sell him and only put a clause in to get maximum value.

[gjohnson]

Not sure how the expiry of this clause is a good thing. Just means that if any offers come in they'll be total pisstakes rather than starting at a minimum of 100. Wouldn't be remotely surprised to see Arsenal coming in with an offer of 30m and thinking we have to accept if for pissing stupid rules

[Danh1]

7 minutes ago, gjohnson said:

Not sure how the expiry of this clause is a good thing. Just means that if any offers come in they'll be total pisstakes rather than starting at a minimum of 100. Wouldn't be remotely surprised to see Arsenal coming in with an offer of 30m and thinking we have to accept if for pissing stupid rules

Aye, I see your point. Imagine the depression if we sell him for like 60/70 mil or so now? 

[Nine]

Expiry of this clause potentially opens the door for a lower transfer fee offer than the clause but with a massive increase in wages than he’s on here, the media will rinse this til the end of the window. Anything can still happen.

 

 

Edited June 25, 2024 by Nine

[GideonShandy]

It's obviously a good thing.  If a 100 million offer had come in we would have had to let Bruno go if he wanted. Now we can tell Arsenal or anyone else to bugger off regardless of whether they offer 30 million or 300 million and whether he wants to leave or not. 

[Nine]

2 minutes ago, GideonShandy said:

It's obviously a good thing.  If a 100 million offer had come in we would have had to let Bruno go if he wanted. Now we can tell Arsenal or anyone else to bugger off regardless of whether they offer 30 million or 300 million and whether he wants to leave or not. 

If there’s a good offer and he wants to leave then he will be allowed to go.

[Nobody]

11 minutes ago, gjohnson said:

Not sure how the expiry of this clause is a good thing. Just means that if any offers come in they'll be total pisstakes rather than starting at a minimum of 100. Wouldn't be remotely surprised to see Arsenal coming in with an offer of 30m and thinking we have to accept if for pissing stupid rules

If anyone wanted him, they wouldn't have had to pay a penny more than £100m, we didn't have a choice but to accept it.

Now we decide what he will cost, and it won't be anywhere near £30m.

[The Prophet]

Not sure how this can be anything, but a good thing.

 

He's happy, he's settled and the power is back in the club's hands.