Jump to content

England’s Dan Burn - Signs Contract Extension until 2027 (Official)


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Either quote someone claiming everything would be fine after swapping Burn out, or stop making shit up.

 

 

 

I mean those blaming Burn for absolutely everything obviously weren't banking on the lad replacing him being directly responsible for 2 goals, and Burn coming on and grabbing a fantastic assist :lol:

 

It was almost a biblical lesson, a moral example you'd see in a school play or something.

 

I wouldn't expect Livramento to take much blame, or him to not still be replacing Burn going forwards, but the stick the latter was getting was shamefull.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did well for the goal, but was the cause of the one he cleared off the line with a very poor bit of play in the lead up to it, so I'd be hesitant to give him credit for that particular incident. 

 

I thought Tino was okay last night, should've done better for Saka's goal, but I thought our other three defenders were worse than him both on the ball and off it. 

 

I'd prefer to see Livramento start going forward as I think he can offer more in general, especially against weaker teams where we have more control and need to offer a more dynamic threat going forward. One assist doesn't really change the fact that Burn has often been very limited going the other way, that cross last night was an anomaly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

I mean those blaming Burn for absolutely everything obviously weren't banking on the lad replacing him being directly responsible for 2 goals, and Burn coming on and grabbing a fantastic assist :lol:

 

It was almost a biblical lesson, a moral example you'd see in a school play or something.

 

I wouldn't expect Livramento to take much blame, or him to not still be replacing Burn going forwards, but the stick the latter was getting was shamefull.

 

I'd have Livramento down as being responsible for Saka's goal (arguably should still have been blocked like and came from Botman's poor error initially), which other one would you say he was to blame for? The first OG was definitely Botman's error, completely missed his initial clearance. Second goal is Botman/Trippier not being switched on. Fourth is Miley turning his back on the cross and poor reactions from Karius. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Andy said:

 

I'd have Livramento down as being responsible for Saka's goal (arguably should still have been blocked like and came from Botman's poor error initially), which other one would you say he was to blame for? The first OG was definitely Botman's error, completely missed his initial clearance. Second goal is Botman/Trippier not being switched on. Fourth is Miley turning his back on the cross and poor reactions from Karius. 

The first, it was bad luck but he could have dealt with it better and hoofed it - we're judging him on Dan Burn Rules here. I wouldn't even blame him for any though personally, even the Saka one. All of our defenders have had a torrid time the past few months.

 

EDIT: Actually here we go, re Burn...

 

"but was the cause of the one he cleared off the line with a very poor bit of play in the lead up to it, so I'd be hesitant to give him credit for that particular incident."

 

 

 

Edited by Hanshithispantz

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hanshithispantz said:

The first, it was bad luck but he could have dealt with it better and hoofed it - we're judging him on Dan Burn Rules here. I wouldn't even blame him for any though personally, even the Saka one. All of our defenders have had a torrid time the past few months.

 

EDIT: Actually here we go, re Burn...

 

"but was the cause of the one he cleared off the line with a very poor bit of play in the lead up to it, so I'd be hesitant to give him credit for that particular incident."

 

 

 

 

 

The point re: Burn was in reference to the posts above praising him for the clearance.

 

There's a weird situation formed where you're unable to criticise Burn without it being framed as a pile-on. He's been one of our poorer players recently, it's acceptable to call him out on errors and he did make another one yesterday in the build up to that incident. 

 

He also did well for the goal yesterday, as I pointed out, which you decided to omit from your quote. His general performance when coming on was as mixed as every other player, and definitely not enough to make me feel all that differently about the left back situation.

 

Edit: also, RE the first goal, Livramento did try to clear it? Botman's leg rises after his initial whiffed clearance and his knee blocks the ball. It's 100% Sven's error. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hanshithispantz said:

I mean those blaming Burn for absolutely everything obviously weren't banking on the lad replacing him being directly responsible for 2 goals, and Burn coming on and grabbing a fantastic assist :lol:

 

It was almost a biblical lesson, a moral example you'd see in a school play or something.

 

I wouldn't expect Livramento to take much blame, or him to not still be replacing Burn going forwards, but the stick the latter was getting was shamefull.

Again a strawman argument. I dont think many people looked at our games lately thought replacing Burn would fix everything. It was just the most glaring problem along with the midfield, but unlike in the midfield we had a possible replacement in Livramento.

 

Dont remember Livra being at fault for 2 goals, he no doubt got outdone one time when left alone against the most inform player in the league. 

 

Great assist by Burn, but lets not act like we have the second coming on David Beckham on our hand. He hit the ball into the box without looking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Again a strawman argument. I dont think many people looked at our games lately thought replacing Burn would fix everything. It was just the most glaring problem along with the midfield, but unlike in the midfield we had a possible replacement in Livramento.

 

Dont remember Livra being at fault for 2 goals, he no doubt got outdone one time when left alone against the most inform player in the league. 

 

Great assist by Burn, but lets not act like we have the second coming on David Beckham on our hand. He hit the ball into the box without looking.

Trademark of a cracking fullback.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Matt1892 said:

The difference being lower half Premier League teams target Burn as the weak link and have success in doing so, with both Semenyo and Ogbene running rings around him.


Semenyo absolutely didn’t run rings around Burn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Andy said:

 

The point re: Burn was in reference to the posts above praising him for the clearance.

 

There's a weird situation formed where you're unable to criticise Burn without it being framed as a pile-on. He's been one of our poorer players recently, it's acceptable to call him out on errors and he did make another one yesterday in the build up to that incident. 

 

He also did well for the goal yesterday, as I pointed out, which you decided to omit from your quote. His general performance when coming on was as mixed as every other player, and definitely not enough to make me feel all that differently about the left back situation.

 

Edit: also, RE the first goal, Livramento did try to clear it? Botman's leg rises after his initial whiffed clearance and his knee blocks the ball. It's 100% Sven's error. 

Burn has done OK.  Our worst defender by far at this moment in time is Botman.  He was awful yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He wasn't the worst on the pitch tonight but I was fed up of him receiving the ball holding it thinking and thinking and thinking then just playing it backwards. When he did pass forward it was so slow the decision the advanced player had someone right up their arse and they lost the ball. 

 

 

Edited by nufcjmc

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Big Jow said:

I’ve never known a player to be unable to direct a header, particularly a professional player. The ball hits his head and it can literally go anywhere.

Proper 50 pence piece heed. Was frustrating the life out of me. He’s got the best heading advantage known to man being the footballing equivalent of the BFG but launching the ball at him is like one of those cricket catching practice machines that fires the ball off on different angles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Big Jow said:

I’ve never known a player to be unable to direct a header, particularly a professional player. The ball hits his head and it can literally go anywhere.

Exactly this 

 

he’s only in the team for his heading 

 

Yet he can’t direct a header ?

 

90% of his passes are to the keeper or centre half 
 

Wouldn’t get in any other top 6/7 side / squad 

 

To be fair neither would

 

Longstaff

Murphy

lascelles 

ritchie 

dummett 

miggy

targett 

anderson 

krafth 

 

Obviously we have been lumped with a fair few from Ashley era 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Big Jow said:

I’ve never known a player to be unable to direct a header, particularly a professional player. The ball hits his head and it can literally go anywhere.

he's admitted this himself before. great at defensive headers but been working on the one at the other end of the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having Willock in there really helps him. Only remember him getting ran once early and after that he was solid, glad he had a good game.

 

Loved his little sorty up front early doors too :lol: shame he couldn't hit the target like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...