Shadow Puppets Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:12, Rich said: Look at Colback’s reaction If he didn’t touch him he’s fuming and would rightly be all over him for diving. He knew he touched him. Expand Surely the fact that we’re even debating it means that it’s not a clear and obvious error on the refs part. I’ve watched it 10 times now and I still can’t decide for sure whether it was or wasn’t. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 This is MLB level shithousery from the ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 I’m sure they only review decisions when players make a massive fuss out of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:13, Shadow Puppets said: Surely the fact that we’re even debating it means that it’s not a clear and obvious error on the refs part. I’ve watched it 10 times now and I still can’t decide for sure whether it was or wasn’t. Expand Eye test marra. I’m serious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:13, Shadow Puppets said: Surely the fact that we’re even debating it means that it’s not a clear and obvious error on the refs part. I’ve watched it 10 times now and I still can’t decide for sure whether it was or wasn’t. Expand It's a penalty. The other one is too, I have no idea what's going on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 Game could on til next Thursday and Huddersfield won’t create a chance in open play. They’re like us under Bruce, slow and predictable as fuck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeepShow4life Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 That forest chairman looks like a Greek Mike Ashley Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:14, Rich said: Eye test marra. I’m serious. Expand That or he needs to stop watching games on his Casio calculator watch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:14, Fantail Breeze said: I’m sure they only review decisions when players make a massive fuss out of them. Expand Feel like we started getting things when we sicced Joe on the ref after things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:13, Shadow Puppets said: Surely the fact that we’re even debating it means that it’s not a clear and obvious error on the refs part. I’ve watched it 10 times now and I still can’t decide for sure whether it was or wasn’t. Expand Yeah but unfortunately some people won’t see it as a debate, they’ll just think they’re right and you’re wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St. Maximin Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 (edited) On 29/05/2022 at 17:13, Shadow Puppets said: Surely the fact that we’re even debating it means that it’s not a clear and obvious error on the refs part. I’ve watched it 10 times now and I still can’t decide for sure whether it was or wasn’t. Expand Correct. It may have been a penalty. It may not have. Even if there was some contact, it may not have been significant enough. Contact doesn’t equal foul. It absolutely isn’t obviously a penalty and a sign you need your eyes testing if you don’t agree. Whatever you think of VAR, it did it’s job correctly here. Edited May 29, 2022 by St. Maximin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 (edited) On 29/05/2022 at 17:16, Gawalls said: Yeah but unfortunately some people won’t see it as a debate, they’ll just think they’re right and you’re wrong. Expand Well it really shouldn't be a debate if it's between people with at least 3 eyes combined between them. Edited May 29, 2022 by Pata Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 Surely the fact he books him for diving, despite there being contact, makes it a clear and obvious error though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:16, St. Maximin said: Correct. It may have been a penalty. It may not have. Even if there was some contact, it may not have been significant enough. Contact doesn’t equal foul. It absolutely isn’t obviously a penalty and a sign you need your eyes testing if you don’t agree. Whatever you think of VAR, it did it’s job correctly here. Expand If there's any contact all in that instance it should be a pen as Colback is nowehere near the ball Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Puppets Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:14, Rich said: Eye test marra. I’m serious. Expand Haha. I agree from one angle it looks like contact, but the other 2 angles don’t. And to me it looks like the Hudds player massively overemphasises the flick back of his leg. As Mike said before, perhaps it’s BOTH a penalty and a dive ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:16, St. Maximin said: Correct. It may have been a penalty. It may not have. Even if there was some contact, it may not have been significant enough. Contact doesn’t equal foul. It absolutely isn’t obviously a penalty and a sigh you need your eyes testing if you don’t agree. Whatever you think of VAR, it did it’s job correctly here. Expand I honestly think when using var that if they can’t decide within seconds then referees decision stands Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Puppets Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:18, The Prophet said: Surely the fact he books him for diving, despite there being contact, makes it a clear and obvious error though? Expand He does dive though? And it’s debatable whether there is actually any significant contact at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:19, Shadow Puppets said: He does dive though? And it’s debatable whether there is actually any significant contact at all. Expand It's theatrical, but it's still a foul. As Mike said, it's a dive but it's still a penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:19, Gawalls said: I honestly think when using var that if they can’t decide within seconds then referees decision stands Expand Referees are leaving it to VAR to make decisions in a lot of cases though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 Come on forest Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:19, Gawalls said: I honestly think when using var that if they can’t decide within seconds then referees decision stands Expand Referee's original decision shouldn't have any standing, there's a reason why VAR was created. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 On 29/05/2022 at 17:19, Shadow Puppets said: He does dive though? And it’s debatable whether there is actually any significant contact at all. Expand He made the most of it but I don't think he could've stayed on his feet, contact or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Puppets Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 (edited) On 29/05/2022 at 17:20, The Prophet said: It's theatrical, but it's still a foul. As Mike said, it's a dive but it's still a penalty. Expand I don’t know. I’ve watched it another few times and I still can’t decide. It still looks to me like he flicks his leg back BEFORE any contact is made. Edited May 29, 2022 by Shadow Puppets Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 (edited) On 29/05/2022 at 17:21, POOT 2.0 said: I liked the thought of Forest being in the Prem. But after seeing their manager...I don't think I could handle seeing his glib expression week in, week out He looks like his 2nd cowie is kicking in. Expand You’d rather Huddersfield shoving 9 men behind the ball until they’re losing and diving all over? We’ve just got rid of Burnley ffs Edited May 29, 2022 by Gawalls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted May 29, 2022 Share Posted May 29, 2022 (edited) On 29/05/2022 at 17:22, Shadow Puppets said: I don’t know. I’ve watched it another few times and I still can’t decide. It still looks to me like he flicks his leg back BEFORE any contact is made. Expand Why would he flick his right leg to his left leg? Why is Colback looking guilty as fuck and not going crazy at him for diving? Edited May 29, 2022 by Pata Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts