Jump to content

Pre-season (2024/25)


bowlingcrofty

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Based on the team selection at the end of last season, he won't be far away.

 

That was last season. Midfield is a position we are looking for a player in, and so I don't think it's likely he starts this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KaKa said:

 

That was last season. Midfield is a position we are looking for a player in, and so I don't think it's likely he starts this season.

We 100% sign a CM, just to light there going into a new season which is why we played Bruno out of his natural position during our run it. (Not saying he cant play there he was great, just that is real position is where Shelvey plays). Point being to the 'Shelvey is a weak link' posters is that signing a new CM still means that Shelvey will keep his position of second choice going forward, it doesnt matter if he started last season or not. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d like Bruno to stay in the position he played last season. He was great. Scored goals and broke up play and made pinpoint passes.

 

Think we’d lose a lot restricting him as purely defensive midfielder 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There’s a genuine argument as to what Bruno’s best position is - particularly in the PL. Without an upgrade of quality in midfield I think he will continue to play higher up because he has quality going forward and we lack that creativity player. That means Shelvey will, unfortunately, likely continue to be first choice in the deeper role. 

 

Whether we we signed a holding midfielder or a progressive attacking midfielder either would effectively replace Shelvey in the team - or at the least and push down the pecking order to start matches.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

 

      Willock

Bruno       Joe

 

Is our best midfield 3 currently. There's no need to start Shelvey even if we dont sign Paqueta.

 

With no signings my front 6 would be this, ASM, Anderson & Wilson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Nine said:

We 100% sign a CM, just to light there going into a new season which is why we played Bruno out of his natural position during our run it. (Not saying he cant play there he was great, just that is real position is where Shelvey plays). Point being to the 'Shelvey is a weak link' posters is that signing a new CM still means that Shelvey will keep his position of second choice going forward, it doesnt matter if he started last season or not. 

 

This is exactly how I see things too.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ponsaelius said:

There’s a genuine argument as to what Bruno’s best position is - particularly in the PL. Without an upgrade of quality in midfield I think he will continue to play higher up because he has quality going forward and we lack that creativity player. That means Shelvey will, unfortunately, likely continue to be first choice in the deeper role. 

 

Whether we we signed a holding midfielder or a progressive attacking midfielder either would effectively replace Shelvey in the team - or at the least and push down the pecking order to start matches.

I think this is where the confusion between us is coming from, I 100% see Bruno taking up his natural defensive role. Others dont and thats fine. For me Shelvey will be second choice next season regardless of who we sign in CM.

 

My only point being, whoever we sign going forward Shelvey retains his spot as second choice DM - Paqueta or whoever you like, it doesnt upgrade Shelvey. It will be Bruno/Shelvey in that role.

 

 

Edited by Nine

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

With no signings my front 6 would be this, ASM, Anderson & Wilson.


I know Shelvey got injured towards the end of last season and he'd been playing before that, but I do feel there was a huge chuck of "continuity" about Shelvey playing. Obviously distinct lack of options, Willock not being in form etc too. But as Shelvey was out and not coming back in, Willock started to show more of what I think he's capable of (still limited, clearly) and he was the one making those forward runs from midfield. I do think it's the better option to drop Shelvey from those starting line ups and move Willock in. I think that's what Howe will do, personally, if we dont get another midfielder in. It will obviously depend on Willock, though. 

 

 

Edited by Super Duper Branko Strupar

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LV said:

I’d like Bruno to stay in the position he played last season. He was great. Scored goals and broke up play and made pinpoint passes.

 

Think we’d lose a lot restricting him as purely defensive midfielder 

 

1 minute ago, Jaqen said:

Was Bruno not more of a double pivot at Lyon? Unless we bring in a really good CM I feel he's a bit wasted as the single pivot in a three. 

 

 

 

 

 

Have you guys not been seeing him rack up goals and assists from that exact position? He's not restricted in that role at all.

 

Think it's more likely we get another athletic runner in the RCM position that can get in the box and also help cover the winger and right back if needed, similar to what Joe does on the left.

 

Bruno will then be central to all the play in the middle, where he will also still have some freedom to move about with two athletic number 8s to either side that can cover for him when needed.

 

That's what I see happening. Might be wrong, but that's what I anticipate going forward.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:


I know Shelvey got injured towards the end of last season and he'd been playing before that, but I do feel there was a huge chuck of "continuity" about Shelvey playing. Obviously distinct lack of options, Willock not being in form etc too. But as Shelvey was out and not coming back in, Willock started to show more of what I think he's capable of (still limited, clearly) and he was the one making those forward runs from midfield. I do think it's the better option to drop Shelvey from those starting line ups and move Willock in. I think that's what Howe will do, personally, if we dont get another midfielder in. I think it's the best option too. It will obviously depend on Willock, though. 

 

 

 

 

This is a good point too. Even if no one comes in, I think it's more likely we actually push Willock or even Longstaff into the first 11 ahead of keeping Shelvey in there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, et tu brute said:


I'm not just making a point [emoji38]

 

Fair enough :lol:

 

I just have no doubts we will get the payers the manager wants in. Worst case scenario, we will loan someone in.

 

There are a lot of players that will be available on loan towards the close of the window.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@KaKafair enough, but that's not the point I was addressing. It was that you can acknowledge that Shelvey has come a long way, whilst still not being good enough, there's no need for the hyperbole.

 

As for Bruno, at Lyon he played as a number six, at a Newcastle he's being played as a number eight. 

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Prophet said:

@KaKafair enough, but that's not the point I was addressing. It was that you can acknowledge that Shelvey has come a long way, whilst still not being good enough, there's no need for the hyperbole.

 

As for Bruno, at Lyon he played as a number six, at a Newcastle he's being played as a number eight. 

 

 

 

 

I think Shelvey is good enough to back up Bruno for this coming season at least. I don't see him in the starting 11 still, going forward, and wouldn't be particularly keen on that.

 

Bruno has played at both the number 6 and the number 8 since he's joined, and has continued to produce both goals and assists in either role.

 

Our best performance of the season against Arsenal, he played as a number 6, with Joe and Longstaff playing as number 8s. He was central to all of our play, and also scored in that game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarrenBartonCentrePartin said:

He doesn’t look comfortable like

 

 

What was the temperature over there? He must've been absolutely melting in that keeper top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

That was a stupid error by Trippier as well. Never seen him make mistakes like that before but he made a few today

 

He did it on purpose, any other game that would've been another freekick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty poor stuff overall. We never at any point had our strongest side out but a lot of performances that will (or should) set some minor alarm bells.

 

I think at this point Anderson has shown he’s capable, he looked a level above ASM to be honest? On what we have currently he deserves a start.. ship Maxi over the right.

 

Longstaff wasn’t great, Murphy was shit, Fraser was non existent and Almiron looked incapable of creating anything. I thought we might have enough as back up to Wilson but I was way off, we desperately need some reinforcements.

 

Midfield and up front. We need 3 players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...