Jump to content

Nick Pope out for a month with knee ligament injury (Various)


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Gillespie literally doesn't count.

 

Ruddy replaced Karius; it's perfectly fine to have a competent third choice goalkeeper. 

 

We tried to shift Dubravka but couldn't because he's rubbish, so we were stuck with him. Then we were forced to sign Vlachodimos to avoid a points ban because of anti-competitive rules. Ergo, no proper new goalkeeper. 

 

The window was crap but not everything has to be the fault of whichever person at the club you fancy slagging off from one day to the next.

 

In that case, if Gillespie doesn't count and is cheap as chips as you're saying, why not just get a 6th keeper and not bother registering him? He's only for training anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, 54 said:

For a Premier League club, it absolutely isn't like :lol:

 

It's 500k a year for someone who isn't ever going to play.  When money is being scrutinised more than ever

 

They could pay anyone to be a training keeper for less than 10k a week

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Gillespie literally doesn't count.

 

Ruddy replaced Karius; it's perfectly fine to have a competent third choice goalkeeper. 

 

We tried to shift Dubravka but couldn't because he's rubbish, so we were stuck with him. Then we were forced to sign Vlachodimos to avoid a points ban because of anti-competitive rules. Ergo, no proper new goalkeeper. 

 

The window was crap but not everything has to be the fault of whichever person at the club you fancy slagging off from one day to the next.

It’s definitely on the club. You can’t watch the drop off in results and performances without Pope last season and then not do anything about it. It literally cost us Europe. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

It’s definitely on the club. You can’t watch the drop off in results and performances without Pope last season and then not do anything about it. It literally cost us Europe. 

 

It's on the club that they couldn't shift an ageing, rubbish, expensive Ashley relic who terminates his own loans? And it's on the club that the PL's anti-competitive rules forced us into making a deal which - as sods law would have it - required us to sign another keeper we didn't want?

 

The Guehi fiasco is 'on the club'. The goalie situation I'm prepared to give them maximum grace for. If there's no PSR then we probably upgrade on Pope; let alone Dubravka. 

 

Honestly blows my mind that even an enemy as common as PSR still won't stop people from going after the club. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Yorkie said:

 

It's on the club that they couldn't shift an ageing, rubbish, expensive Ashley relic who terminates his own loans; and it's on the club that the PL's anti- competitive rules forced us into making a deal which - as sods law would have it - required us to sign another keeper we didn't want?

 

The Guehi fiasco is 'on the club'. The goalie situation I'm prepared to give them maximum grace for. If there's no PSR then we probably upgrade on Pope; let alone Dubravka. 

 

Honestly blows my mind that even an enemy as common as PSR still won't stop people from going after the club. 

It blows my mind that people can’t accept even the most obvious bit of criticism towards them. 
 

PSR did not stop us signing an upgrade on Dubravka. We literally tried and failed numerous times to sign Trafford. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

It blows my mind that people can’t accept even the most obvious bit of criticism towards them. 
 

PSR did not stop us signing an upgrade on Dubravka. We literally tried and failed numerous times to sign Trafford. 

 

 

I'll criticise when it's warranted; I literally did so in the post you quoted re Guehi.

 

I thought the Trafford thing was conditional on us shifting Dubravka. We went back in for him even after Vlachodimos arrived iirc.

 

And like I say, we're probably not even in for the likes of Trafford if PSR isn't a thing - we try to upgrade Pope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

 

I'll criticise when it's warranted; I literally did so in the post you quoted re Guehi.

 

I thought the Trafford thing was conditional on us shifting Dubravka. We went back in for him even after Vlachodimos arrived iirc.

 

And like I say, we're probably not even in for the likes of Trafford if PSR isn't a thing - we try to upgrade Pope.

I think Trafford would definitely still be a target tbh, seems very much in keeping with our targets under Howe (that’s not a criticism). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kanj said:

 

one of Nick's family members?


Yeah, sorry. Worded that terribly. I know a few of them and played a season with his brother years and years ago. With that and from being round this way.it’s why I’m so biased about him. For all I do genuinely rate him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doctor Zaius said:

Vlachodimos played 150+ times for Benfica and is a current international. Better option than a soon to be 36 year old Dubravka?

 

Looked a bit shit for Greece whenever he was tested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...