Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, The Prophet said:

 

"In our grasp" is a bit of a stretch with half of the season to go.

We are in a great position - top 4 is real possibility with a bit of luck. But we need to strengthen to take advantage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The Prophet said:

Chris Waugh in the Athletic Q&A:

 

"As of the conversations I had as recently as yesterday with well-placed insiders, there hasn't been a firm decision taken yet.

There is a realisation that they are "ahead of schedule", which is something that was reiterated at a board meeting earlier this month, and they are conscious of not spending beyond their means. Eddie Howe, however, is keen for them to strengthen and would like one or two first-team-ready editions.

That's a long way of me basically saying, I can't give you a conclusive answer because they don't know themselves. That may seem like me fudging this one, but that's the truth of the situation to the best of my knowledge."

Refuse to believe they don’t know what they want to do yet. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kanji said:

Sitting here on 1/12 looking at the window - I'll say it's a real missed opportunity to not strengthen where Howe wants in the positions he wants. 

 

The club continue to remind us about FFP issues, I won't argue against those because I haven't the time or energy or access to the data to work the math out, but I am certain we do eventually need to shift some of the deadweight off the books to free up wages, squad places, and increase income through player trading and commercial deals. 

 

Really don't know whats going on with the commerical side - we saw a flurry of activity before the Saudi winter break and that was really encouraging but not heard too much about new commerical deals for the future otherwise. If the CEO and Commerical guy can't get those deals done quick enough or advance them to know that X is incoming over X years, let's go and spend that'll be a real disappointment. 

 

Many many days left in the window, and I know the club plead poverty then signed Isak so as usual, judge them when it SLAMs shut. 

 

 

 

Who do you think is offering to buy our deadwood and take on their wages, out of interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless there is a very lucrative deal on the table, I prefer not buying any players that would replace our starting eleven. We should instead get more covers, more young prospects that can step up when needed

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nbthree3 said:

And promptly 

 

When Trippier went down injured the other night I immediately thought of this guy, I don't know who he is but this seams like a sensible transfer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
57 minutes ago, Zero said:

Unless there is a very lucrative deal on the table, I prefer not buying any players that would replace our starting eleven. We should instead get more covers, more young prospects that can step up when needed


You upgrade your first team and then they become the cover/subs. This is how you improve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, reefatoon said:


You upgrade your first team and then they become the cover/subs. This is how you improve.


Absolutely, this idea of “improving the bench” is nonsense.  It leads to what’s always happened here, signing sub par players on long and expensive contracts who become difficult to shift.  Every first team signing needs to be a player who can immediately challenge and improve the first 11.  Players then from the first 11 may drop to the bench which gives depth.  Showed the other night when Isak and St Maximan both came on

 

 

Edited by Andy84

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really not one or the other anymore. If we need a 1st teamer and a January deal is acceptable, then they'll do it. Likewise, they'll be looking to buy young prospects for positions we don't have a current urgent need for that might take a bench role.

 

FFP does limit and if we use Botman as an example, at the moment we don't need someone to compete with him but we need an improvement over current bench options. Do we spend c. 40m on that person or 20m on a prospect who's not quite there but has that potential. 

 

I doubt there's any club (Man City aside) that has a bench if 1st-team "ready" players.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...