Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Kanji said:

Sitting here on 1/12 looking at the window - I'll say it's a real missed opportunity to not strengthen where Howe wants in the positions he wants. 

 

The club continue to remind us about FFP issues, I won't argue against those because I haven't the time or energy or access to the data to work the math out, but I am certain we do eventually need to shift some of the deadweight off the books to free up wages, squad places, and increase income through player trading and commercial deals. 

 

Really don't know whats going on with the commerical side - we saw a flurry of activity before the Saudi winter break and that was really encouraging but not heard too much about new commerical deals for the future otherwise. If the CEO and Commerical guy can't get those deals done quick enough or advance them to know that X is incoming over X years, let's go and spend that'll be a real disappointment. 

 

Many many days left in the window, and I know the club plead poverty then signed Isak so as usual, judge them when it SLAMs shut. 

 

 

 

Who do you think is offering to buy our deadwood and take on their wages, out of interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless there is a very lucrative deal on the table, I prefer not buying any players that would replace our starting eleven. We should instead get more covers, more young prospects that can step up when needed

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nbthree3 said:

And promptly 

 

When Trippier went down injured the other night I immediately thought of this guy, I don't know who he is but this seams like a sensible transfer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
57 minutes ago, Zero said:

Unless there is a very lucrative deal on the table, I prefer not buying any players that would replace our starting eleven. We should instead get more covers, more young prospects that can step up when needed


You upgrade your first team and then they become the cover/subs. This is how you improve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, reefatoon said:


You upgrade your first team and then they become the cover/subs. This is how you improve.


Absolutely, this idea of “improving the bench” is nonsense.  It leads to what’s always happened here, signing sub par players on long and expensive contracts who become difficult to shift.  Every first team signing needs to be a player who can immediately challenge and improve the first 11.  Players then from the first 11 may drop to the bench which gives depth.  Showed the other night when Isak and St Maximan both came on

 

 

Edited by Andy84

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really not one or the other anymore. If we need a 1st teamer and a January deal is acceptable, then they'll do it. Likewise, they'll be looking to buy young prospects for positions we don't have a current urgent need for that might take a bench role.

 

FFP does limit and if we use Botman as an example, at the moment we don't need someone to compete with him but we need an improvement over current bench options. Do we spend c. 40m on that person or 20m on a prospect who's not quite there but has that potential. 

 

I doubt there's any club (Man City aside) that has a bench if 1st-team "ready" players.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Hhtoon said:

It's really not one or the other anymore. If we need a 1st teamer and a January deal is acceptable, then they'll do it. Likewise, they'll be looking to buy young prospects for positions we don't have a current urgent need for that might take a bench role.

 

FFP does limit and if we use Botman as an example, at the moment we don't need someone to compete with him but we need an improvement over current bench options. Do we spend c. 40m on that person or 20m on a prospect who's not quite there but has that potential. 

 

I doubt there's any club (Man City aside) that has a bench if 1st-team "ready" players.

 

 


Agreed. We have our list of players we want and if one of them is attainable for the right price then we’ll probably sign one of them later in the window. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reefatoon said:


You upgrade your first team and then they become the cover/subs. This is how you improve.

 

In a perfect world yes that's how it would work. However there will be players currently playing in the first 11 who don't want to just be sat on the bench as rotation/cover. You have to strike the right balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
21 minutes ago, Mazzy said:

 

In a perfect world yes that's how it would work. However there will be players currently playing in the first 11 who don't want to just be sat on the bench as rotation/cover. You have to strike the right balance.


I totally agree with bringing in young players that could be brought into the squad and used from the bench. I don’t think we should be going out to sign players not good enough for our first team though. We are nowhere near good enough squad wise to bring in players just to sit on our bench. It’s probably only Man City and Chelsea that do that. If we are to sign players, you can bet it will be to improve the first 11 and not some mediocre player to just sit on the bench.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need to Strengthen (end of) …even if it’s just 1 player.

 

if you stand still (you fall behind) in the premier league.

 

Everyone else below us in the table will  be improving and by the looks of it some decent signings  (which will help them close the gap)….everyone above us in the table will look to strengthen and widen the gap.

 

Doesn’t have to major changes , just enough to keep improving. 
 

All about bringing in the right player and not necessarily quantity. 
 

In HOWE we trust. 

 

 

Edited by JonBez comesock

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hhtoon said:

It's really not one or the other anymore. If we need a 1st teamer and a January deal is acceptable, then they'll do it. Likewise, they'll be looking to buy young prospects for positions we don't have a current urgent need for that might take a bench role.

 

FFP does limit and if we use Botman as an example, at the moment we don't need someone to compete with him but we need an improvement over current bench options. Do we spend c. 40m on that person or 20m on a prospect who's not quite there but has that potential. 

 

I doubt there's any club (Man City aside) that has a bench if 1st-team "ready" players.

 

 

Literally every top 6 side aspires for that or close. It's first team players or youngsters aiming to become regulars.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of becoming a top 6 side, is dealing with good players who will not be happy to sit on the bench.

 

Every top 6 club has 8-10 players who signed expecting to be a 1st team regular - that has to sit on the bench.

 

Wan-Bissaka. Matt Doherty. Tomiyasu. Tierney.

 

We have Wood & Murphy getting loads of minutes per month. Trippier and the midfielders barely get a break. We could sign 3 first team players and not disrupt the squad much at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, arnonel said:

Our bench should be understudies with high ceiling.

Not first teamers

 

It should be a mix of understudies, first teamers being rotated and youngsters.

 

It's not yet but it will be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, madras said:

It should be a mix of understudies, first teamers being rotated and youngsters.

 

It's not yet but it will be.

This is the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we should sign 2 more players in this window. We will probably be in Europe next season and we will likely need to play 10+ more games than this season. With our current squad I think we overachieved this season and if we are not careful enough, we may be dragged into a relegation battle next season like 16/17 Leicester, 05/06 Everton, 05/06 Real Betis and 03/04 Celta Vigo. We will need at least 5-6 more players for European competitions and if we only sign them in summer it also takes time for so many players to gel in the team. If we can sign 2 players this month then hopefully it can smooth out the process a bit while also giving us a lift for the push into top 4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why on earth should we have an understudy for Sean Longstaff?

 

High ceiling youngsters

First teamers

 

The way we have competition at CF, we need that in midfield. 1 or 2 injuries or suspensions and the team starts to pick itself.

 

i reckon Joel is dropped for the weekend.

 

Longstaff Bruno Willock

Almiron Wilson ASM

 

Isak is the only useful option off the bench here. We'll almost certainly see Murphy run out too. Any other substitutions will be enforced, luxury or desperate.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...