Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Danh1 said:

Not sure I want Maddison. Cracking player but seems to have completely shrunk in Leicester’s fight to stay up, been shite and attitude has been horrific by all accounts. 
 

Then again I’m sure Eddie will sort that. 

10 goals and 9 assists in 27 games this season 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

10 goals and 9 assists in 27 games this season 

Fair enough like! Just going from speaking to my mate who’s a Leicester fan, suppose he’s always going to be pissed off. :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Danh1 said:

Not sure I want Maddison. Cracking player but seems to have completely shrunk in Leicester’s fight to stay up, been shite and attitude has been horrific by all accounts. 
 

Then again I’m sure Eddie will sort that. 


Can happen to any player tbh - just needs to get out of there and start afresh - being in a scrap can take it out of players mentally 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Maddison, but I wonder if I just have 'Paqueta' feelings towards him. 

 

You lot will know better, but I'm trying to work out where he would play. Left side of attack is the obvious one and I reckon Isak will make that spot his own. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Stal said:

I like Maddison, but I wonder if I just have 'Paqueta' feelings towards him. 

 

You lot will know better, but I'm trying to work out where he would play. Left side of attack is the obvious one and I reckon Isak will make that spot his own. 

I’d assume the right hand side and he would tuck in quite a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a player like Maddison allows us to play 433 4231 4141 4411 442 - just this one player allows us to be so flexible, which we need to be next season - I’m all for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mikky said:

Having a player like Maddison allows us to play 433 4231 4141 4411 442 - just this one player allows us to be so flexible, which we need to be next season - I’m all for it

We can do all those formations now. Maddison wouldn't make us any more flexible on that score and while he offers an attacking threat greater than what we have I'm not sure if he can add off the ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mikky said:

Having a player like Maddison allows us to play 433 4231 4141 4411 442 - just this one player allows us to be so flexible, which we need to be next season - I’m all for it

 

Exactly this. Part of the reason Maddison is such an exciting signing is his ability to play effectively in so many positions. Playing at home against a bottom half side who are sitting deep? Play him on the right of the 3 in midfield and he can move forward, effectively meaning we can transition into a 4-2-3-1 with him as the 10. Playing against a top side? Play him on the right of the front 3 and he can drop back and play as another midfield presence when needed. He adds something we don't currently have. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, madras said:

We can do all those formations now. Maddison wouldn't make us any more flexible on that score and while he offers an attacking threat greater than what we have I'm not sure if he can add off the ball.

 

4-2-3-1 / 4-4-1-1 is Isak dependent in the hole.

 

We don't have any alternatives. I'd like to see Isak himself with Maddison & an ASM type.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

 

4-2-3-1 / 4-4-1-1 is Isak dependent in the hole.

 

We don't have any alternatives. I'd like to see Isak himself with Maddison & an ASM type.

Where as I'd like a Maddison type but someone who can do the press and intensity that has made us what we've become. I'm just not sure he can do that.

 

 

Edited by madras

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I can definitely see us going for Gallagher in the longstaff role, think we can get better mind.

Probably my ignorance of not seeing enough of him, but when we played them up here he looked so lightweight and simply not good enough. Though at Palace everything seemed to go through him, so I'm a bit torn really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SiLvOR said:

Probably my ignorance of not seeing enough of him, but when we played them up here he looked so lightweight and simply not good enough. Though at Palace everything seemed to go through him, so I'm a bit torn really.

Aye, there is definitely a player there and his style would suit us. I do think we can do better for the money though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jackflap said:

Sell Maxi and proceeds plus 10m for Barnes is a no brainer for me


Barnes won’t come that cheap. Not what we should be going for either imo. We will play against quite a few teams that sit back in the near future and he needs space. Want someone with more flair and creativity. But also reasonably dynamic.

 

 

Edited by Ikon

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

They wanted 50 million in January, not sure if we could get him cheaper with their need to sell.


Yeah, I’m sure we can get him for cheaper than 50. He’s surely at the point now where he’d be pushing for a move and, Liverpool aside, I can’t see any “bigger” clubs than us going for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SUPERTOON said:

2 years left on his deal, if they go down how much you reckon ?


40-45? He talked about selling ASM and adding 10m unless I misunderstood. We won’t get that much for ASM at this moment imo. (Only because of fitness)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...