Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Edwards is a condescending prick who writes for a paper who backs the party that has acted to this region's detriment for decades, backed Bruce to the hilt solely on the basis that they're mates and is on the record saying he enjoys winding the fans up when in the midst of abysmal relegation form under the stewardship of his mate. Hope he fucks off and stops reporting on us tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II

Aye get to fuck even defending that bald prick like, he’s such a shitty writer too, my boys can spell and write better and as far as journalism goes he’s the pits as most are, the man/Womenchester has no inside track whatsoever. Hope he drowns on a glass of wine!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Um ... guys we need to prepare ourselves for the eventuality that Pedro isn't going to come in and be backup striker right away ahead of Wood.

 

I know this is what we all want and envisage but I don't think the manager will see things that way.

 

Hopefully the kid comes in and blows everyone away and can make that role his, but yeah ... don't expect it right away, unless there's likely to be even more soiled sheets due to bed wetting :tongue3:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the last time I'm saying this but why would we ever tell our budget to Edwards? How naive you have to be to think Edwards or Hope or any journalist would be given information like that? Edwards reporting it as gospel shows he thinks way too highly of himself. The amount we end up spending is completely irrelevant, he's clueless.

 

And fuck Edwards, anyone saying Bruce did a stellar job keeping us up while watching the games is an absolute idiot.

 

 

Edited by Pata

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II
1 minute ago, KaKa said:

Um ... guys we need to prepare ourselves for the eventuality that Pedro isn't going to come in and be backup striker right away ahead of Wood.

 

I know this is what we all want and envisage but I don't think the manager will see things that way.

 

Hopefully the kid comes in and blows everyone away and can make that role his, but yeah ... don't expect it right away, unless there's likely to be even more soiled sheets due to bed wetting :tongue3:

As Joan Armatrading once sang, I’m an easy rider when it comes to this kid, I haven’t seen anything of him other than YouTube and what you’ve posted, same with most players we are linked with. So if we don’t get him, I, not fussed. We desperately need at least two quality attacking players in though and if we don’t add them this will be a failure of a window by the club. I’m confident, however, and I hear we have a medical booked in for Friday, 3.00pm…

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II

Mind, based on what I’ve seen and researched, yes please. He looks a real prospect and who doesn’t love a Brazilian in our colours!

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, KaKa said:

Um ... guys we need to prepare ourselves for the eventuality that Pedro isn't going to come in and be backup striker right away ahead of Wood.

 

I know this is what we all want and envisage but I don't think the manager will see things that way.

 

Hopefully the kid comes in and blows everyone away and can make that role his, but yeah ... don't expect it right away, unless there's likely to be even more soiled sheets due to bed wetting :tongue3:

By all accounts from Watford fans this lad isn’t even a striker 

Link to post
Share on other sites


 

he’s the deep lying forward/ false nine type, so the post above about comparing him to Firmino sounds about right. 

 

“He is a versatile forward, able to play anywhere across the front line, starting so far under Rob Edwards as the focal point of a three. “He’s best centrally in a trident with two forwards prepared to make runs behind defenders,” explains Roy Hodgson, Watford manager during the second half of last season. “Then he can drop and be a deep-lying target player.”

“Give him freedom to float,” agrees Eduardo Oliviera, who oversaw Joao Pedro in the Fluminense under-17s. “He wants to be part of the game every time. He’s not only good in the box, he’s good at building the game.”

 

Source: 

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2022/08/14/joao-pedro-watford-forward-no-one-talking-yet/

 

I will be honest, I never watched him much. All I saw was some Youtube videos, a few articles, and his stats breakdown. I can see that he could play as a lone striker (false nine) where he drops deep to receive the ball or attracts defenders to create space for the wingers and attacking midfielders to score.
 

This system can be very prolific if we play him as a lone striker (false 9) and sign a winger and a midfielder who are great in front of the target (Harrison and Paqueta/Maddison for example). 
 

He can also play as a deep lying forward next to another forward, and that means Howe would go back to his beloved 4-4-2. 
 

I can understand why some folks here are worried about his low number of goals. But if his role is to become a false 9/deep lying forward, then scoring goals becomes his secondary objective. Another point is that he’s still 20 , and he played most of his career at Watford, here I am hoping he could work on his finishing and improve it if he comes here. CR7 for example improved his goals/game ratio dramatically after he turned 23 or something. Pedro isn’t CR7, but I mean he is still raw, and his ceiling might be high based on what I have read. 
 

 

 

 

Edited by Solitude20

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, STM said:

He's 20, so he's no where near the finished article, nor has he nailed down his "position", so to speak.

 

From what I've seen, he might be 20 but he's built like a man. Strong, quick, technical, plays between the lines but still quite rough around the edges and still quite inconsistent.

 

Natural comparisons would be with Richarlison or perhaps a more physical version of Ayoze Perez. Apparently his work rate is top drawer too, so he's right up Eddie's street.

 

In short, he can play anywhere across the front but he's not accomplished in any position yet but he's still probably going to offer more than Chris Wood.

I’ve never understood the saying top drawer - why is that drawer better than the other two? 
 

i keep my jeans in the bottom drawer so surely that should be my best drawer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gawalls said:

I’ve never understood the saying top drawer - why is that drawer better than the other two? 
 

i keep my jeans in the bottom drawer so surely that should be my best drawer.


Because it’s usually the knicker drawer 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where does the saying top drawer come from?

Answer: In the olden days in England, a woman's dresser-room would have a hierarchy of drawers. The top drawer was where they kept the jewellery and valuables. The saying is, therefore, linked to being high-class.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PauloGeordio said:

Where does the saying top drawer come from?

Answer: In the olden days in England, a woman's dresser-room would have a hierarchy of drawers. The top drawer was where they kept the jewellery and valuables. The saying is, therefore, linked to being high-class.

That’s better so you go for the jewellery whilst LV goes for the knickers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PauloGeordio said:

Where does the saying top drawer come from?

Answer: In the olden days in England, a woman's dresser-room would have a hierarchy of drawers. The top drawer was where they kept the jewellery and valuables. The saying is, therefore, linked to being high-class.

 

Who gives a fuck about jewellery?  What level is the panty drawer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

I’ve never understood the saying top drawer - why is that drawer better than the other two? 
 

i keep my jeans in the bottom drawer so surely that should be my best drawer.

 

It depends if your jeans look like this 

 

Ev4KX42XMAAO1pT.jpg

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II

I’ve been keeping mine brief for years now, some people still get their knickers in a twist over what I post mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...