Alexander Isak - C*nt (resting his glass bones so he can get properly injured at the world cup)

[ianbeany]

3 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

He's knows absolutely nothing. 

 

Was he fucking breathing into the mic again? He's disgusting 

 

Luckily his mic was really low and you could barely hear him speak the entire time.  Everyone in the comments was complaining about it but I was just relieved I couldn't hear his horrible grunting and breathing for once 

[Coffee_Johnny]

8 hours ago, gbandit said:

If we were ever going to sell him this window it would have needed to be early and an offer we couldn’t possibly turn down, e.g. £200m

 

Isak and other clubs have precisely zero negotiating cards. If he wants to come back with his tail between his legs, he can but he doesn’t deserve any love from the fans

Deserving or not, and let’s face it, we don’t know the full details, fact is he will/could get all the love he has had and more. We are a forgiving bunch—fans in general not just ‘us’—a well worded heart-felt interview a performance which shows he is working his bollocks off, a goal or an assist or a mazy Evertonesque run. Even the most hurt of us would welcome him back with open arms. 

It’s hard sitting with the uncertainty, the sense of rejection and betrayal seeming to ‘down tools’ triggers, but we can and will do it. If the outcome is right. 

 

 

Edited July 29, 2025 by Coffee_Johnny

[Paully]

 

[McCormick]

Not as bullish as I’d want there, Eddie.

[Menace]

"Liverpool have officially bid £100M for Alexander Isak"

[Palestoon]

3 minutes ago, McCormick said:

Not as bullish as I’d want there, Eddie.

 

Sounded good until that last line. Is he referring to the ownership having the final say?

[Ben]

2 minutes ago, Palestoon said:

 

Sounded good until that last line. Is he referring to the ownership having the final say?

 

Puts pressure on them though, Jamie Reuben must be involved.

[r0cafella]

I read what the gaffa said as isaks desire to stay isn't within his control. 

[mattypnufc]

Probably more alluding that if an obscene offer came in we’d have to consider it. 

[oldtype]

Wearing a long sleeve training jacket in July Seoul weather. Absolute psychopath behavior from Eddie.

[Shadow Puppets]

I really think we just need to sell and move on. It’s clear he’s not going to be here long term, whether we can squeeze one more year out of him or not, and keeping him just pushes the can down the road until next summer (which is when we all probably expected him to leave). We can’t possibly go through all of this again next summer.

 

Obviously try to get as much for him as possible, aim for £135m (or something like that £120m + Harvey Elliot), and just move on to the next chapter in our development.

 

I’m not convinced that keeping him at this stage leads to any real positive outcome.

[gdm]

Just now, Shadow Puppets said:

I really think we just need to sell and move on. It’s clear he’s not going to be here long term, whether we can squeeze one more year out of him or not, and keeping him just pushes the can down the road until next summer (which is when we all probably expected him to leave). We can’t possibly go through all of this again next summer.

 

Obviously try to get as much for him as possible, aim for £135m (or something like that £120m + Harvey Elliot), and just move on to the next chapter in our development.

 

I’m not convinced that keeping him at this stage leads to any real positive outcome.

And replace him with who? 

[SUPERTOON]

2 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:

I really think we just need to sell and move on. It’s clear he’s not going to be here long term, whether we can squeeze one more year out of him or not, and keeping him just pushes the can down the road until next summer (which is when we all probably expected him to leave). We can’t possibly go through all of this again next summer.

 

Obviously try to get as much for him as possible, aim for £135m (or something like that £120m + Harvey Elliot), and just move on to the next chapter in our development.

 

I’m not convinced that keeping him at this stage leads to any real positive outcome.

If we bring a replacement in first and sell on our terms (straight cash no Elliott) then we do the deal. Personally still wouldn’t sell to Liverpool.

[r0cafella]

Take a cut price so a Liverpool stiff can warm our bench

[Shadow Puppets]

1 minute ago, gdm said:

And replace him with who? 

Wissa + another… ideally Sesko.

 

I’d even probably take two “stop gap” strikers for a year if necessary. If Sesko doesn’t happen, its pointless spending big money on any lesser targets for now. Just get some capable bodies in for the time being (in the Wissa ability and price range) and find our long term Isak replacement in January or next summer if necessary.

 

I just don’t see the point in keeping him around now. If he’s made it clear he wants to leave, and his agent is going to play silly buggers until he does, we’re just prolonging the inevitable. 

[Lush Vlad]

“Aim for £135m.” 
 

What?!  

[polkaDot]

I see the plane from planet soft cunt just landed

[gdm]

2 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:

Wissa + another… ideally Sesko.

 

I’d even probably take two “stop gap” strikers for a year if necessary. If Sesko doesn’t happen, its pointless spending big money on any lesser targets for now. Just get some capable bodies in for the time being (in the Wissa ability and price range) and find our long term Isak replacement in January or next summer if necessary.

 

I just don’t see the point in keeping him around now. If he’s made it clear he wants to leave, and his agent is going to play silly buggers until he does, we’re just prolonging the inevitable. 

I agree unless he comes out signs a new contract like MGW it’s going to be almost counter productive keeping him but we can’t weaken our squad significantly more than we already have. If we can’t get Sesko, isak just can’t go 

[Shadow Puppets]

4 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Take a cut price so a Liverpool stiff can warm our bench

Elliot is a good player in a position we need more depth in.

 

I really think we’re deluded if we think anyone in world football will pay £150m for Isak (I’d love to be proved wrong though).

 

7 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

If we bring a replacement in first and sell on our terms (straight cash no Elliott) then we do the deal. Personally still wouldn’t sell to Liverpool.

 

It’s Liverpool or no one by the looks of it. I agree, ideally we have a replacement (or at least one of them) in before sanctioning anything, but I’ve made peace now that he’s likely leaving, and likely joining Liverpool. I’d rather it just happened quickly so we can all move on.

[r0cafella]

1 minute ago, Shadow Puppets said:

Elliot is a good player in a position we need more depth in.

 

I really think we’re deluded if we think anyone in world football will pay £150m for Isak (I’d love to be proved wrong though).

 

 

It’s Liverpool or no one by the looks of it. I agree, ideally we have a replacement (or at least one of them) in before sanctioning anything, but I’ve made peace now that he’s likely leaving, and likely joining Liverpool. I’d rather it just happened quickly so we can all move on.

More than happy for Isak to sit in our reserves until next summer personally. I wouldn't sell to Liverpool period rewarding the blatant attempts at unsettling our players 2 summers in a row isn't it my MO. 

 

As for Elliot, he's a mid player cartel cast off who will end up turning in 6/10 performances for Fulham. 

[Smal]

wouldn’t sell to Liverpool in any circumstance. He can join them on a free in 3 years if he must.

[Shadow Puppets]

2 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said:

“Aim for £135m.” 
 

What?!  

We won’t get more than that, and I really think we’re deluded if we think we’re going to get more. The player is essentially on strike.

 

This situation is paralysing the club. Just rip the fucking band aid off and move on. £135m is a realistic figure (ideally more but unlikely).

[Fak]

44 minutes ago, Paully said:

 

 

Sounds like his stance has softened a bit. 

[Geogaddi]

3 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:

Wissa + another… ideally Sesko.

 

I’d even probably take two “stop gap” strikers for a year if necessary. If Sesko doesn’t happen, its pointless spending big money on any lesser targets for now. Just get some capable bodies in for the time being (in the Wissa ability and price range) and find our long term Isak replacement in January or next summer if necessary.

 

I just don’t see the point in keeping him around now. If he’s made it clear he wants to leave, and his agent is going to play silly buggers until he does, we’re just prolonging the inevitable. 

Problem is if we sell Isak and don't properly replace him this summer then we are basically writing our season off. I agree that we need to sell him as I think the way he has gone about this has been disgraceful and he has shown the club zero respect at all but if we aren't able to get Sesko then I don't think we can let Isak leave. Our squad is already way off where it needs to be for the coming season and letting Isak go for a stop gap signing would make us even weaker. 

[Nucasol]

🚨OLIVER HOLT IS A TOTAL NONCE ALERT 🚨 

 

https://archive.ph/0CMwC

 

Check out the chops on this one. Another pop at us “Saudi fanboys”.