Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

Just now, relámpago blanco said:

Why sounds like we've rejected a 120m bid for Isak and we won't sell for less than 150. If he goes someone will have to bid 150

 

 

That's assuming we've set a price of £150m, which I'd be surprised if we have. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all about spite for me now. We can't sell him to Liverpool, end of discussion. Fuck him and them, he's got 3 years on his contract left so he simply has to stay, play, and score goals. 

 

If he cries himself to sleep every night, so be it. 

 

I am not in the slightest bit confident that this will happen though. Bleak season ahead if he goes, just think of the mockery when we play Liverpool, it would be unbearable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think in all of this Liverpool actually feel they really need Isak.

 

With the tragedy of Jota, Nunez on his way and Diaz already gone.  Yes Ekitike signed but I’m not sure if they’re really convinced on him to be the player the need yet. 
 

They’re literally trying to sign one of the top strikers in world football from us.  In a market not blessed with great strikers.  Not only that, from a PL rival who also have Champions league football this season. Who’s under contract for 3 more years.   On top of that I don’t think they have a central striker at the moment who they are truly convinced of.  The fee should be enormous, ridiculous, astronomical, eye watering to even make them have their doubts.  

 

 

Edited by Andy84

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool won’t pay £150m, I’d love us to tell them to do one but I think the next bid (speculating around £130m/£135) will be enough.

 

There’s absolutely no leadership at the club at all. Liverpool are taking the absolute piss out of us and our absentee owners are just going to suck it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Novocastrian said:

Liverpool won’t pay £150m, I’d love us to tell them to do one but I think the next bid (speculating around £130m/£135) will be enough.

 

There’s absolutely no leadership at the club at all. Liverpool are taking the absolute piss out of us and our absentee owners are just going to suck it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Novocastrian said:

Liverpool won’t pay £150m, I’d love us to tell them to do one but I think the next bid (speculating around £130m/£135) will be enough.

 

There’s absolutely no leadership at the club at all. Liverpool are taking the absolute piss out of us and our absentee owners are just going to suck it up.

 

Surely not, there's already been reports that Yasir is involved. Why would they settle for a low offer and make themselves look weak?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, ideally I want him shot of and us to have been concluding deals quietly whilst getting the top whack he's worth.

 

I don't think the first part of that is going to happen so reluctantly the best option is to keep him until we can form a proper plan.

 

But seriously Alex, what an absolute cunts trick you've pulled on NUFC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Novocastrian said:

Liverpool won’t pay £150m, I’d love us to tell them to do one but I think the next bid (speculating around £130m/£135) will be enough.

 

There’s absolutely no leadership at the club at all. Liverpool are taking the absolute piss out of us and our absentee owners are just going to suck it up.

This is my sentiment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I alone in thinking that the amount Liverpool bid doesn't matter at all at this point? 

 

We can't sell until we have replacements signed. They could offer us £300m up front today and it would still be a crazy risk to accept as we might go into a full league season with Osula as our only striker.

 

Hard to see in practical terms how this could get done in the remaining window. 

 

Of course, we might just totally give up on the prospect of being a top level club and sell him without replacements. But surely not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

Surely not, there's already been reports that Yasir is involved. Why would they settle for a low offer and make themselves look weak?

They already look weak, they’ve had ample opportunity to speak out and put down a marker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Ed Vinegar said:

Am I alone in thinking that the amount Liverpool bid doesn't matter at all at this point? 

 

We can't sell until we have replacements signed. They could offer us £300m up front today and it would still be a crazy risk to accept as we might go into a full league season with Osula as our only striker.

 

Hard to see in practical terms how this could get done in the remaining window. 

 

Of course, we might just totally give up on the prospect of being a top level club and sell him without replacements. But surely not.

 

My view too, even at £150m+ we have to see 2 strikers coming in. If that doesn't happen then he can't be sold. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

Surely not, there's already been reports that Yasir is involved. Why would they settle for a low offer and make themselves look weak?

In reality, in terms of leadership we are weak.

 

In maybe not reality, we all still have PTSD from the Ashley era.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, St1pe said:

Aye but that’s never gonna happen in a football or financial way of thinking is it. I’d like to see Osula get subbed on instead of the cunt for half a season but it’s not happening. 

 

If we keep Isak and sign Wissa, then we've already got a better strike force than Liverpool, and it will only cost £40m tops. The we spend the rest on improving the squad and why can't we have a tilt at the title?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would drag this out. Uncomfortable for all, but we need replacements and the club comes first. If Liverpool really want him, then they'll eventually cough up £150m. 

 

Can't help but think Isak and his agent have overplayed their hand by going this maximalist.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

People saying the likes of ‘he‘ll never play here again if he stays’, ‘burnt bridges’ etc etc. So many examples of players who have pulled this kind of manoeuvre and ended up staying and all being rosey. Kane not long ago for one. 
 

We’ll all quickly move on if he stays and scored another 20+.

 

 

Edited by Nine

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really crazy like. Thing is they can probably still afford £150m and if I was them I'd do it. Adding him on to the squad they already have guarantees they will be close to winning the champions league and premier league ever year for the next few years atleast. Which will more than cover his fee. 

 

Once Salah leaves it's less guaranteed. But to take the best striker "available" ahead of all your rivals it seems like a no brainer. 

 

What doesn't make sense is our seemingly inevitable weakening of our position  just because he's kicked up a fuss. 

 

Put it this way if he's at any of Man City Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea. Do you think they sell to a fellow domestic club for any price? Let alone 120-130m when you have currently zero other senior strikers at your club 2 weeks before a season starts. 

 

It's madness from the club if we let him go.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...