Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

If he scored a shit-ton of goals then everything that's happened here gets put out of sight/out of mind. However, it doesn't seem remotely likely that he starts firing on all cylinders in spite all of this ugliness; he's actively conspiring against his manager and all his teammates. I've never known a player do this scorched earth thing in all my time supporting NUFC; it's quite something really, not a typical situation.

 

He's done here and imo the objective now, sadly, has to be squeezing the maximum amount of money out of Liverpool despite our weakening negotiating position.

I think we'd be playing right into their hands and setting an extremely dangerous precedent, but it seems a lot of people (potentially including the club) disagree.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

I think we'd be playing right into their hands and setting an extremely dangerous precedent, but it seems a lot of people (potentially including the club) disagree.

 

 

 

 

The precedent is all that matters at this point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, WinstonFC said:

Anyone who wants him to leave below market value better not cry about PSR next summer. We have to get what hes worth and maximise our own position

 

Why would anyone want him to leave below market value? I just don't want to sell him to Liverpool. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, gdm said:

If we keep him and try sell him in June clubs will have us over a barrel 

Take the points deduction then. Fuck does it even matter if we finish 6th or 14th? Not like we can attract players when we're in the Champions League anyway. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Playing devils advocate here somewhat - but if the way we have played the Isak situation "makes us look weak" or whatever. What would keeping Isak for a year and signing say Jackson and Wissa look like?..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Nobody said:

Take the points deduction then. Fuck does it even matter if we finish 6th or 14th? Not like we can attract players when we're in the Champions League anyway. 

 

You're my favorite Swede again, Sverige.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

It’s only weakened if we allow it to be. Giving into his behavior will be what weakens our position.

 

He's making it impossibly difficult though.

 

From what Howe is saying, Isak has manifested a situation where his mere existence around his teammates reduces our chances of winning matches.

 

Therefore, to me, the safer play is to (regrettably) engage Liverpool, maximise the fee, and send him on his way. Buy two new strikers and let's crack on. 

 

The alternative is brinkmanship; we shield the rest of the squad from him until such a point that he decides to apply himself. The earliest that happens is probably after the transfer window has closed, several games into the season.

 

Option two honestly seems more dicey to me at this point, particularly seeing as he'll be well off the pace if he ever does accept that he needs to do another year here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We’d still be able to get mega money next summer (£130m+). Palace held out for £70m last year for Guehi with 2 years left on his deal. Press on and sign 2 forwards and let him sweat. We won’t like, but he definitely doesn’t deserve his own way. 
 

Cant actually get over how he’s acting. A despicable cunt of a bloke. If he’d done all this privately - yes it would hurt, especially to Liverpool - but he’d have been able to return with his head held high. 
 

Really hope we show some strength and don’t back down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

He's making it impossibly difficult though.

 

From what Howe is saying, Isak has manifested a situation where his mere existence around his teammates reduces our chances of winning matches.

 

Therefore, to me, the safer play is to (regrettably) engage Liverpool, maximise the fee, and send him on his way. Buy two new strikers and let's crack on. 

 

The alternative is brinkmanship; we shield the rest of the squad until such a point that he decides to apply himself. The earliest that happens is probably after the transfer window has closed, several games into the season.

 

Option two honestly seems more dicey to me at this point, particularly seeing as he'll be well off the pace if he ever does accept that he needs to do another year here.

Option 2 every day. Sets the precedence for players and agents and the cartel for decades… Can’t put a price on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chicken Dancer said:

We’d still be able to get mega money next summer (£130m+). Palace held out for £70m last year for Guehi with 2 years left on his deal. Press on and sign 2 forwards and let him sweat. We won’t like, but he definitely doesn’t deserve his own way. 
 

Cant actually get over how he’s acting. A despicable cunt of a bloke. If he’d done all this privately - yes it would hurt, especially to Liverpool - but he’d have been able to return with his head held high. 
 

Really hope we show some strength and don’t back down. 

 

This is it for me. The behaviour is completely uncalled for after everything we've done for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure Newcastle are in as bad of a situation as portrayed here and in other places.

 

Liverpool are desperate for a striker. They’d be worse off not getting Isak than Newcastle getting one or two strikers + not selling which makes the position fairly strong.

 

They’ve lost 3 attackers this window and  only replaced with 1. Plus Salah will be away on afcon. They absolutely need to reinforce right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mike said:

 

The precedent is all that matters at this point.

 

And not disincentivising new players from joining too.

 

I think NUFC have to be seen to acting reasonably. Howe and a mature/non-petty approach helps. So reintegrating back him into the team with limited fanfare would be helpful if he doe stay until January/next summer when a non-derisory offer comes in.

 

Hopefully the fans follow the lead of Howe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WinstonFC said:

Theres people posting a fee below 150m 

He’s worth what the club are happy to sell him for and what another club is willing to pay; not what posters on internet forums think he’s worth. 

 

NB I haven’t seen anyone suggest that the club should take a bath on Isak

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

He's making it impossibly difficult though.

 

From what Howe is saying, Isak has manifested a situation where his mere existence around his teammates reduces our chances of winning matches.

 

Therefore, to me, the safer play is to (regrettably) engage Liverpool, maximise the fee, and send him on his way. Buy two new strikers and let's crack on. 

 

The alternative is brinkmanship; we shield the rest of the squad until such a point that he decides to apply himself. The earliest that happens is probably after the transfer window has closed, several games into the season.

 

Option two honestly seems more dicey to me at this point, particularly seeing as he'll be well off the pace if he ever does accept that he needs to do another year here.

I just don’t see how that is the safer play, unless they do pay what he is worth to us? And even then, it still sends a message that players can force a move with shitty behavior. Hardly brinksmanship when approaching it from angles other than his cash value. What’s also very valuable to the club is making sure that their other best players don’t start doing the same, and that giants like Liverpool shouldn’t bother with unsettling our players because it plainly won’t work. Levy dealt with a somewhat similar scenario on the club’s terms…as should we. Getting something below their valuation because it is a bothersome situation is absolutely self destructive. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have to be seen to stay strong. If we allow him to go for a cheap price (which is why he is behaving the way he has under the instruction of Liverpool to drive down the price) then it says to every other player: Behave like a total cunt and get your move away from Newcastle United.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

Why would anyone want him to leave below market value? I just don't want to sell him to Liverpool. 

tbh it's not even the money for me- it is selling to Liverpool - just cannot do it under any circumstances.  Getting Ekitike and Isak? Club gotta come out of this with some dignity. 

 

 

Edited by duo

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beren said:

 

And not disincentivising new players from joining too.

 

I think NUFC have to be seen to acting reasonably. Howe and a mature/non-petty approach helps. So reintegrating back him into the team with limited fanfare would be helpful if he doe stay until January/next summer when a non-derisory offer comes in.

 

Hopefully the fans follow the lead of Howe.

Bang on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...