Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:

Nope. Not one of our big players. And I’m not going to say who because it’s unhelpful.


I don’t know how Matt Targett thinks he deserves a new contract when he is already earning £300k pw

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Rosenrot said:

Hope reckons £130m plus addons would get the deal done.

Only if we had of signed a competent striker we would have considered it. That's the way I read it. Think his statements put that to bed mind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, teohgk said:

Still no official transfer request [emoji38] greedy lying cunt

How does that mechanism work anyway? Does the contract outline in black and white the steps for an "official" transfer request?

 

If the club reached an agreeable deal with Liverpool and he came by asking for his Loyalty bonus on the way out, are there any grounds to point to today's statement and tell him to pester that bald Dutch nonce for it instead.

 

 

Edited by Pandamninator

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, RUHRLYASLEEVESUP said:

I bet @Shadow Puppets knows as hes an ITK 

As said earlier, I know of one player who I’m not about to put on here (but it’s not one of our “big players”). The rest of the squad are fully supportive of the club’s stance.

 

But as I said, I’m 99% sure that’s not what Hope means in his article. He’s saying that the players are split on whether they’d welcome him back or not….not whether or not they support the clubs stance vs his.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Shadow Puppets said:

Fucks sake. I wish I’d never said anything now. Forgot I mentioned anything. 

 

(And no it’s not Lascelles)


Like a giant NUFC guess who.

 

Is he bald?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:

As said earlier, I know of one player who I’m not about to put on here (but it’s not one of our “big players”). The rest of the squad are fully supportive of the club’s stance.

 

But as I said, I’m 99% sure that’s not what Hope means in his article. He’s saying that the players are split on whether they’d welcome him back or not….not whether or not they support the clubs stance vs his.

 

 

Aye, think the villa game highlights how everyone is together in the squad. I’d imagine last night will only strengthen that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:

As said earlier, I know of one player who I’m not about to put on here (but it’s not one of our “big players”). The rest of the squad are fully supportive of the club’s stance.

 

But as I said, I’m 99% sure that’s not what Hope means in his article. He’s saying that the players are split on whether they’d welcome him back or not….not whether or not they support the clubs stance vs his.

 

 


How do you know the entire squad are supportive of the clubs stance mate ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Romano basically summed up Isaks statement in his two line tweet. This is fuck all to do with promises, it’s purely down to him deciding he wants to join Liverpool. 
 

He’s decided this is worth torching everything he’s built here to achieve that end. Man is a snake. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...