Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

That statement from Isak still has me absolutely fuming and shows just what a selfish cunt he is. The statement only transpired to explain and justify his absence from an award ceremony. Absolutely no statement to explain his absence from doing his fuckin job. He’s absolutely fucked us this summer to the extent that it’s almost impossible to get a replacement for Wilson because other clubs know we are desperate. I just really wish someone like psg or Madrid came in for him and not Liverpool and we could get the selfish prick to fuck 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Robster said:

Genuine question, what would/could the 'Add ons' be ?

I don't know why we have to consider them. It should just be a straight out, flat fee - £ 150 Million (minimum)

Could be things like:

 

x amount per appearence/goal for, say, first 50 appearences/goals

 

x amount after however many appearences/goals

 

x amount if they win the league/Champions League

 

x amount if named PFA player of the year/league's top goalscorer

 

% of next sale / of profit from next sale

 

That sort of stuff

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Checko said:

Could be things like:

 

x amount per appearence/goal for, say, first 50 appearences/goals

 

x amount after however many appearences/goals

 

x amount if they win the league/Champions League

 

x amount if named PFA player of the year/league's top goalscorer

 

% of next sale / of profit from next sale

 

That sort of stuff


x amount for not going on strike at Liverpool

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stottie said:

What matters here is whether Isak believes Ekitike is on 250k a week, as reported by German sources used by Sky Sports.

 

Liverpool's wage bill is nearly 400M quid off a near 700M turnover. It takes a lot of very high salaries to reach 400M. They can afford and probably pay multiple players very high salaries, otherwise 400M would not be the total. They probably also slip Romano and Orstein 10 grand to report BS lower salaries to fans to keep them onside and buying shirts and tickets.

 

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-wage-bill-rise-explained-31274636

 

Our wage bill is about 220M. If you assume Liverpool has a far larger organization with loads more low salaries for loads more admin staff, it likely means their first team will be on at least 50% more than our lads, with bigger spikes for their superstars.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20250503130606/https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6176973/2025/03/06/newcastle-accounts-analysis/

 

 

But why would they pay Ekitike £250m a week when they don't need to? Are you telling me he'd have refused to go if they offered him £180k/week?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£125m flat fee

£2m for every season Liverpool qualify for Europe whilst Isak is there for next 5 seasons

£2m for every season Isak scores 10+ goals whilst at Liveroool for next 5 seasons

£5m for winning the league title in the next 5 seasons

 

That’s a realistic add ons IMO and would see a deal get done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers all.

 

In Isak's case, Liverpool aren't being potential. They are buying the finished article. Feels like add ons are for when a player may or may not achieve certain levels or standards.
Doesn't seem to apply here, for me. Fuck them. Lump sum total. No add ons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

£125m flat fee

£2m for every season Liverpool qualify for Europe whilst Isak is there for next 5 seasons

£2m for every season Isak scores 10+ goals whilst at Liveroool for next 5 seasons

£5m for winning the league title in the next 5 seasons

 

That’s a realistic add ons IMO and would see a deal get done.

Less than Coutinho 8 years ago. With inflation Coutinho was 180 mil. 150 is too low by far in my opinion, it should be 150 guaranteed, 25 in add ons if he, scores 20 goals in a season, pool win a title makes 100 appearances  etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as the other players keep all this crap out of their heads, you have to imagine its affecting some of them. We all know that pool will probably put in another bid after the match,but we all know that Isak is probably going nowhere because we cant find a Wilson replacement, nevermind an Isak one. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

 

But why would they pay Ekitike £250m a week when they don't need to? Are you telling me he'd have refused to go if they offered him £180k/week?

 

 

No but his agent's job is to get it as high as possible within Liverpool's wage structure. When we were the best option at the table, the wage was as high as possible within our wage structure.

 

Only an incompetent agent would settle for less. The reality is that Liverpool can and do pay way higher wages than us. It's not a simple 10k or 20k more  It is likely 50% more, as suggested by their wage costs in their accounts. We do not hear more about this because too many people benefit from the myth of football being a remotely fair competition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite funny that he’s complaining about a lack of increase in pay - this is basically due to PSR - and who are one of the half a dozen that have cost him a contract renewal? …… PL darlings Liverpool - maybe him and his agent should take their grievances to Liverpool and the PL

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no movement on this until Tuesday once our game vs them is over. hope we fucking beat them. we need the points anyway. would be shit if we lose to them and next day another lowball Isak offer.

 

at least only 7 days left of the window after the Monday game.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Famous Nick said:

no movement on this until Tuesday once our game vs them is over. hope we fucking beat them. we need the points anyway. 

 

We are desperate for points like 2 games into the season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wong989 said:

Less than Coutinho 8 years ago. With inflation Coutinho was 180 mil. 150 is too low by far in my opinion, it should be 150 guaranteed, 25 in add ons if he, scores 20 goals in a season, pool win a title makes 100 appearances  etc


Inflation is bollocks when it comes to transfers though. Coutinho was also peak Barca stupidity, so even harder to use as a gauge. £150m that’s realistic, is the value especially with a disgruntled striker where we don’t know what he will do in September. 
 

I’m sure club will be same in thinking, and not some fairy thoughts of £200m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should be made as tough as possible for Liverpool to do the deal after all the drama caused and a no value bid. 

 

I'd keep pushing Liverpool until they offered £150m and the second they offered £150m I'd reject it after all the heartache caused to the club, fans and obviously the backroom staff working hard to get a replacement in. 

 

Few hours of the transfer window to go I would demand £160m all up front and no addons crap. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TopL0ader said:

It should be made as tough as possible for Liverpool to do the deal after all the drama caused and a no value bid. 

 

I'd keep pushing Liverpool until they offered £150m and the second they offered £150m I'd reject it after all the heartache caused to the club, fans and obviously the backroom staff working hard to get a replacement in. 

 

Few hours of the transfer window to go I would demand £160m all up front and no addons crap. 

Look at how Brentford do business. If they can have us over the barrel for a 29-year-old wantaway with two years left, surely the club owned by the richest sovereign wealth fund in the world can take its cue from there and hold fast for a 25-year-old wantaway with three years left?

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Emotic said:

Look at how Brentford do business. If they can have us over the barrel for a 29-year-old wantaway with two years left, surely the club owned by the richest sovereign wealth fund in the world can take its cue from there and hold fast for a 25-year-old wantaway with three years left?

They will hold fast. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...