Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Smal said:

watching Arsenal v Man U from 2005 on sky and it’s scary how much he and Henry are alike at times. We’re going to have to improve big time if we want to keep him.


Yes Arsenal and other clubs will come sniffing eventually. I see us keeping Isak more than Bruno though (I think he might go after next season) so I’m not that concerned really. They don’t have any reason to sell Isak unless the player agitates a move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

Others have already said, but any future attacking signings need to be made to get the absolute best out of Isak.


I think a 4-2-3-1 is the way to go imho. Not that i think we will. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was hoping he’d get a goal yesterday but it didn’t seem to be happening. Just a fraction off with everything up at the sharp end. The supporting cast didn’t make the best use of him either. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OverThere said:

I've been saying the same for an age but week after week same old same old.


Given the actual players available who would you play as the midfield 2 and who at 10?

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Smal said:

watching Arsenal v Man U from 2005 on sky and it’s scary how much he and Henry are alike at times. We’re going to have to improve big time if we want to keep him.

Imagine him in Arsenal's team this season. We really don't play to his strengths, he would thrive in front of such a creative midfield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lotus said:


Given the actual players available who would you play as the midfield 2 and who at 10?

 

I'm not entirely convinced a 4-2-3-1 would suit us with the current personnel, but if we had to play that formation I'd try Miley at 10 with Bruno and Longstaff as midfield 2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Stottie said:

Gordon could easily play #10 in a 4-2-3-1. He comes inside so much he's half doing it already.

Bruno and Tonali as the two.

 

Would be a waste of Gordon's pace and directness playing at 10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jonny1403 said:

 

Would be a waste of Gordon's pace and directness playing at 10.

 

This! Also not exactly creative or the playmaking type of player as an ideal 10. Leave him on the left. As of now we don't have the personnel to go 4-2-3-1. I think we should though if we wish to get the best out of Isak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stottie said:

Gordon could easily play #10 in a 4-2-3-1. He comes inside so much he's half doing it already.

Bruno and Tonali as the two.

Tonali is not available....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...