andyman Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 https://www.instagram.com/skysports/reel/DAQYmJ_pr-f/ You tell him, Erling Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Love Haaland! Arteta talks shit a lot times and he suddenly has Haaland doing it to his face. And I just saw Ian Wright calling him a coward for throwing the ball at Gabriel. If it was not an Arsenal player, Wrighty would be calling that banter. But because it's Arsenal and their hearts are broken, Haaland is a coward. Love Wrighty too but that was a bit emotional. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 So the PL reviewed the footage of Haaland throwing the ball off Turkey Teeths head and decided no ban, does that mean its now allowed? Roy Keane got a red card for doing it to Shearer... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Just now, geordie_b said: So the PL reviewed the footage of Haaland throwing the ball off Turkey Teeths head and decided no ban, does that mean its now allowed? Roy Keane got a red card for doing it to Shearer... Refs were biased in favour of Newcastle though. Sure Shearer kicked Neil Lennon in the head and didn't even get a yellow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 13 minutes ago, geordie_b said: So the PL reviewed the footage of Haaland throwing the ball off Turkey Teeths head and decided no ban, does that mean its now allowed? Roy Keane got a red card for doing it to Shearer... Keane got a red for throwing a punch at Shearer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) 24 minutes ago, geordie_b said: So the PL reviewed the footage of Haaland throwing the ball off Turkey Teeths head and decided no ban, does that mean its now allowed? Roy Keane got a red card for doing it to Shearer... The Norwegian press will obviously have a pro-Haaland bias, but felt it was argued reasonably well that it cold set a very harsh precedent for future situations of a similar ilk when it couldn't be proven beyond reasonable doubt that the throw was 100% intentionally aimed to hit the Arsenal player's head. In other words, even though it seems fairly obvious it was intentional, giving a retroactive punishment for it could mean a player that genuinely hit a player with the ball by accident when throwing it (for whatever reason) would also have to be retroactively punished. In other words, Haaland didn't get punished for something he did that was arguably quite intentional so that any other players in the future who didn't do something similar intentionally would get the same punishment The rule that apparently would've been applied to hand out retroactive punishment would have been "unsportsmanlike conduct" and if the ref had dealt with it on the pitch it'd have been a yellow card, which also could be why there was no retroactive punishment handed out as they only seem to happen when it's an offense that would've been a direct red card that's been overlooked. Edited September 23 by Kaizero Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Think it went to VAR but they went with no decision on the basis that it was really funny and that Arsenal are cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 It was a yellow card offence and nothing more Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) Haaland bonking him on the head is so funny man Edited September 23 by Deuce Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Iconic moment. I absolutely love the lad, not his footballing style as I find it boring as fuck but I love how odd he is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) Loving Chris Wood’s career renaissance at Forest. Edited September 23 by Deuce Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 4 minutes ago, gbandit said: Iconic moment. I absolutely love the lad, not his footballing style as I find it boring as fuck but I love how odd he is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Just now, Pixelphish said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Despise Man City personally. Want Arsenal to win the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 4 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: Despise Man City personally. Want Arsenal to win the league. Dear god man pull yourself together. Anyone wanting Arteta to win anything other than a lifetime of herpes needs a check up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Haalands mentality is crazy. Aboslutely ruthless. It shows in his personality aswell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) 29 minutes ago, gbandit said: Iconic moment. I absolutely love the lad, not his footballing style as I find it boring as fuck but I love how odd he is He was very exciting to watch at Dortmund. He scored in some spectacular ways, using speed, stregth and even scoring goals from distance. It's just the role he has in Man City, like facing a low block every single game when they are passing the ball around the box. Edited September 23 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Just caught up on Trossard's red. Don't know how anyone can find it funny tbh; absolutely pathetic that a player should be cautioned and ultimately have to leave the field for that. Football: The Referee Show. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) He's kind of right, but I'm not upset about it. It was just funny. If he did something similar against us, we'd be fuming. He did have a go at Dan Burn when we played them. Edited September 23 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) 2 hours ago, Kaizero said: The Norwegian press will obviously have a pro-Haaland bias, but felt it was argued reasonably well that it cold set a very harsh precedent for future situations of a similar ilk when it couldn't be proven beyond reasonable doubt that the throw was 100% intentionally aimed to hit the Arsenal player's head. In other words, even though it seems fairly obvious it was intentional, giving a retroactive punishment for it could mean a player that genuinely hit a player with the ball by accident when throwing it (for whatever reason) would also have to be retroactively punished. In other words, Haaland didn't get punished for something he did that was arguably quite intentional so that any other players in the future who didn't do something similar intentionally would get the same punishment The rule that apparently would've been applied to hand out retroactive punishment would have been "unsportsmanlike conduct" and if the ref had dealt with it on the pitch it'd have been a yellow card, which also could be why there was no retroactive punishment handed out as they only seem to happen when it's an offense that would've been a direct red card that's been overlooked. Honestly referees often make assumptions about things being deliberate in situations where it's pretty obvious. You can rarely (or even never) prove "deliberate" 100%, because you can't read their mind. Can we prove 100% beyond reasonable doubt that Trossard intentionally kicked the ball away? What if he didn't hear the whistle, can we prove that he did? No, but everyone knows that he must have heard it. Just like everyone could see that Haaland did it intentionally. Edited September 23 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St. Maximin Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Justice for all round nice club Man City. They may be facing countless charges of corruption, but at least they didn’t get angry a few times like Arteta did. He should be in jail. Imagine if we engaged in time-wasting tactics too. Wouldn’t be like us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 38 minutes ago, Erikse said: Honestly referees often make assumptions about things being deliberate in situations where it's pretty obvious. You can rarely (or even never) prove "deliberate" 100%, because you can't read their mind. Can we prove 100% beyond reasonable doubt that Trossard intentionally kicked the ball away? What if he didn't hear the whistle, can we prove that he did? No, but everyone knows that he must have heard it. Just like everyone could see that Haaland did it intentionally. Had to figure out what was what and this is the long and short of it: Retroactive punishment for on-pitch/bench incidents can only be applied for a "bannable" offense. Taken literally this means the ref and the VAR team would have had to have overlooked an offense that should have been a direct red card. FA disciplinary team ruled it was "unsportsmanlike conduct" and that a yellow card should have been awarded by the referee at the time. However, the FA disciplinary team also ruled it was not "an act of violent conduct", which would have been a red card offense. Had it been a red card offense, the FA disciplinary team would have retroactively given Haaland a ban equal to an on-pitch direct red card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Rodri out for the season with a ruptured ACL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Kaizero said: Had to figure out what was what and this is the long and short of it: Retroactive punishment for on-pitch/bench incidents can only be applied for a "bannable" offense. Taken literally this means the ref and the VAR team would have had to have overlooked an offense that should have been a direct red card. FA disciplinary team ruled it was "unsportsmanlike conduct" and that a yellow card should have been awarded by the referee at the time. However, the FA disciplinary team also ruled it was not "an act of violent conduct", which would have been a red card offense. Had it been a red card offense, the FA disciplinary team would have retroactively given Haaland a ban equal to an on-pitch direct red card. Oh, yeah I see now that you said "retroactive". I thought that you were talking about the onfield decision. Yellow seems about right, without really knowing the rules myself. Edited September 23 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted September 23 Share Posted September 23 Haaland’s head hadn’t gone at all, he’s an excellent troll, that’s all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now