Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Firstly it didn't hit his arm at all. Secondly, even if it hit his arm, it comes off a different body part of his first no? And by todays rules that also means no handball? (open it on X for better quality)

 

 

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Erikse said:

Firstly it didn't hit his arm at all. Secondly, even if it hit his arm, it comes off a different body part of his first no? And by todays rules that also means no handball?

 

 

Nah, any handball at all, intentional or not by the goalscorer = disallowed 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Erikse said:

Firstly it didn't hit his arm at all. Secondly, even if it hit his arm, it comes off a different body part of his first no? And by todays rules that also means no handball? (open it on X for better quality)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Whst was given on field?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Nah, any handball at all, intentional or not by the goalscorer = disallowed 

 

Fair, but still.. Looks like the chest. Even if it hits his shoulder. Is the shoulder handball now? Not even sure it touches the shoulder.

 

Edit: It does hit the arm actually, but quite far up the arm. No idea where the limit is.

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Erikse said:

 

Fair, but still.. Looks like the chest. Even if it hits his shoulder. Is the shoulder handball now? Not even sure it touches the shoulder.

 

 

 

Doesn't look like handball to me either, was just saying how the rule works really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't think it was handball. The first Forest goal looked like an offside player was in the keepers eyeline at least at much as the one given against Liverpool last week, so they probably cancel out. Obviously would prefer 2-0 because its Liverpool and I hate them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Salah looking a lot better sadly.

Thankfully Isak has equipped his invisibility cloak.

The rat anonymous again, and people are starting to notice and ask questions.

 

How much longer can he keep using the "still getting back to 100% fitness" excuse?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jewel said:

The rat anonymous again, and people are starting to notice and ask questions.

 

How much longer can he keep using the "still getting back to 100% fitness" excuse?

 

I noticed a few groans when he lost the ball near the end of the first half. Think their fans are already starting to get frustrated with him

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...