Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Teasy said:

 

Because we tried to play with wingbacks using players about as far from wingbacks as possible.  Also Pope.


Did we? Thought we played our usual 4 at the back. We were just shit and couldn’t play round or past a press. Along with Krafth and Burn not being good enough at full back. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jewel said:

You can see why Eddie has never fancied Paqueta. Something about him that's clearly off.


Yep. You’d think he is good enough to play for a top side. Better than us, even. He is just clearly a basket case and is too emotional. 
 

Explains why he is still at West Ham. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17645181431702705666136998343443.thumb.jpg.16cfa1b75dabddcd9699be1c4ca583f5.jpg

 

"Look I have no influence at the PremierLeague, after all I'm just an Evertonian that supports Liverpool, but someone as the Premier League has the power to say 'Whoever beats West Ham today is crowned Premier League winners', after everything that's happened to Liverpool over the years, It feels the least they could do"

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lush Vlad said:


Did we? Thought we played our usual 4 at the back. We were just shit and couldn’t play round or past a press. Along with Krafth and Burn not being good enough at full back. 

 

We were playing as if we were relying on the extra width provided by very attacking fullbacks with two players that couldn't provide it.  Doesn't matter if it's 4 at the back or 5, its the fact we were playing as if we had Hall and Livremento, using Burn and Kraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...