Still not worthy of a thread

[duo]

11 hours ago, gdm said:

Suppose they have to be 100% sure before canning someone’s career. It’d be a travesty if he’s banned for years and he’s innocent. 

Agreed but why should it take the whole season to investigate? If innocent it's not fair to the player to have this hanging over his head for so long.  If guilty he shouldn't be playing.

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by duo

[gdm]

4 minutes ago, duo said:

Agreed but why should it take the whole season to investigate? If innocent it's not fair to the player to have this hanging over his head for so long.  If guilty he shouldn't be playing.

 

 

 

I imagine it is quite complex. Depends what evidence they have 

[Nucasol]

Just now, gdm said:

I imagine it is quite complex. Depends what evidence they have 

The whole of Paqueta Island in Brazil betting on him getting a yellow card.

[gdm]

5 minutes ago, Nucasol said:

The whole of Paqueta Island in Brazil betting on him getting a yellow card.

That’s not proof tho 

[duo]

6 minutes ago, gdm said:

That’s not proof tho 

Betfair analytics is - I don't think he would have been so publicly accused if they didn't have some strong evidence already.

[gdm]

1 minute ago, duo said:

Betfair analytics is - I don't think he would have been so publicly accused if they didn't have some strong evidence already.

Im no legal guy but im assuming they need a smoking gun. Ie messages from Paqueta saying he’s gonna get himself booked or telling people to bet him.