Group B: England, Iran, United States, Wales (England and USA qualify)

[Yorkie]

1 minute ago, Pata said:

 

That group was very close to having two of the worst five teams in the tournament tbf.

 

This again.

 

Wales were terrible tbf; only Qatar worse at this tournament. But the narrative pre-Iran was how difficult a match that was going to be and we annihilated them. USA are canny; no worse than many others who'll finish second. 

[ponsaelius]

Statistically England's group was the most difficult with the only one with all four teams in the top 20 

[Wullie]

4 minutes ago, Pata said:

 

That group was very close to having two of the worst five teams in the tournament tbf.

 

It was the only group where all 4 teams are in the FIFA top 20.

[Dandy Man]

Just now, ponsaelius said:

Statistically England's group was the most difficult with the only one with all four teams in the top 20 

You can prove anything with stats

[geordiesteve710]

6 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Might be if you said all Iranians are horrific cheaters. Is that what you’re saying Steve? Is it? Eh? Shameful (?)

Just all of the ones on the TV at the time ?‍♂️

[ponsaelius]

Not proving anything tbh, just saying the idea of how bad teams being argued retrospectively is not fullproof. They look bad because they were well beaten.

[Cronky]

England were a lot better, and Wales were a lot worse, than I was expecting.

 

Pleased that the Americans got through. They deserved it 

[TheBrownBottle]

8 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

I’m in my 40s now.  In my lifetime England have made it out of the groups of a WC in 9 out of 10 attempts (albeit this doesn’t include failure to qualify in ‘94).  That’s pretty fucking routine in fairness. 

[Wullie]

This thread makes for glorious reading if you start from kick off in a game that England dominated from start to finish. What a load of fannies. 

 

Bloody Southgate!

[Dandy Man]

1 minute ago, ponsaelius said:

Not proving anything tbh, just saying the idea of how bad teams being argued retrospectively is not fullproof. They look bad because they were well beaten.

Was facts not stats but point stands

 

[samptime29]

2nd half was fantastic. Satisfying.

[Pata]

FIFA rankings are a joke until they prove your point.  Wales were horrid and past it, Iran took 100 minutes to score against Wales and created nothing in a must win game against USA.

 

England ended up doing well but there's no England manager who wouldn't have qualified from that group.

 

 

Edited November 29, 2022 by Pata

[Kid Icarus]

2 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

I’m in my 40s now.  In my lifetime England have made it out of the groups of a WC in 9 out of 10 attempts (albeit this doesn’t include failure to qualify in ‘94).  That’s pretty fucking routine in fairness. 

I'm 38, so not quite there, but it's regularly felt like we've made a meal of it compared to now.

[ponsaelius]

1 hour ago, Segun Oluwaniyi said:

England, Italy, and Ghana all made serious errors letting this Musah boy go play for the the US. He wasn't raised there nor are his parents American and he would have a part to play for all of those teams. One of the best midfielders I have seen in this tournament for any team, tbh.

 

He was the far the US midfielder I was most impressed with, definitely.

 

Have no issue with him playing for the US though. I like that FIFA have relaxed their nationality rules considerably in recent decades tbh and allow players to switch relatively freely. Gives for much more depth in international football.

[Pata]

4 minutes ago, ponsaelius said:

Not proving anything tbh, just saying the idea of how bad teams being argued retrospectively is not fullproof. They look bad because they were well beaten.

 

I'm mainly basing it on how they looked against each other and USA, not against England.

[Disco]

Decisions for Southgate to make for the Senegal game. Does he stick with the 433 that seems to working fine? Who starts wide out of Saka, Rashford and Foden? Who plays in the midfield?

[TheBrownBottle]

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

I'm 38, so not quite there, but it's regularly felt like we've made a meal of it compared to now.

I don’t remember many where it was particularly stressful young’un  

[Deuce]

21 minutes ago, Caleb70 said:

Aye alreet

 harsh not to hit you with a safety smiley. My bad.

[Ameritoon]

Very similar vibes to the 2010 World Cup for the US so far. Big difference is we're more talented but a lot more naïve. I'll take it.

[Disco]

[Pata]

Just now, Disco said:

Decisions for Southgate to make for the Senegal game. Does he stick with the 433 that seems to working fine? Who starts wide out of Saka, Rashford and Foden? Who plays in the midfield?

 

                      Kane

        Sterling          Mount

          Hendo        Rice

                   Phillips

Shaw                                 Walker

        Stones  Maguire  White

                     Pickford

[Disco]

Just now, Pata said:

 

                      Kane

        Sterling          Mount

          Hendo        Rice

                   Phillips

Shaw                                 Walker

        Stones  Maguire  White

                     Pickford

Getting kicked out the tournament for fielding 12 players? Can’t see it tbh

[Pata]

1 minute ago, Ameritoon said:

Very similar vibes to the 2010 World Cup for the US so far. Big difference is we're more talented but a lot more naïve. I'll take it.

 

Think you have a good chance to beat Holland if Pulisic can play and whoever is playing CF has a good game.

[LiquidAK]

It's all a bit of a pointless argument tbh. The cynics will say it was an easy group and this was what should've been expected. The hopefuls will say we made it look pretty easy and routine (I count myself in that group personally). When we (almost certainly) don't win the tournament the cynics will feel vindicated regardless of how it plays out, and if we do somehow win the lot then it'll be an easy draw or luck or whatever. Up til now we've done everything we've needed to do. 

[Pata]

Just now, Disco said:

Getting kicked out the tournament for fielding 12 players? Can’t see it tbh

 

Ahh shit, got too excited.