Guest Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 They arranged international friendlies during the height of COVID. Mega brains. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 18 hours ago, 500bhp said: They are taking the piss with the second point. That's just a normal operational risk that every club is exposed to. It's like us saying we need an allowance because MA didn't grow our commercial income for 14 years in line with other clubs. Or that last season we had the worst injury crisis in PL history, which means we lost revenue from being knocked out the CL and finishing 7th instead of 4th. Exactly what Stefan Borson indicated, Everton weren’t allowed the bad debt argument by the PL panel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BergenMagpie Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 All clubs are equal, but some clubs are more equal than others. Really need some changes to how the PL is being ran. Getting absolute sick of this lack of transparency and objectivity. Ruining the league Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 1 hour ago, FloydianMag said: Exactly what Stefan Borson indicated, Everton weren’t allowed the bad debt argument by the PL panel. PL have tied themselves in a knot here. Everton and other clubs (including us hopefully) will have a field day with this in their next meeting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 Refuse to believe the people running the Premier League would be that dumb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 1 minute ago, OCK said: Refuse to believe the people running the Premier League would be that dumb It wouldn't be a lack of intelligence, it would be a lack of integrity Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 8 Share Posted August 8 45 minutes ago, midds said: It wouldn't be a lack of intelligence, it would be a lack of integrity Exactly. What are Masters and co going to do? Penalise Man U for non-compliancy of PSR regulations? That's a surefire way to get the sack. And therein lies the problem... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BergenMagpie Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 (edited) Love their vids, but they could've made that a bit better. Like highlighting how Man Utd and Chelsea are protected Edited August 11 by BergenMagpie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
80 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 23 minutes ago, BergenMagpie said: Love their vids, but they could've made that a bit better. Like highlighting how Man Utd and Chelsea are protected Yeah, assumed they were going to carry on ruling out the likes of them before going back to Everton as an easy hit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 It was a fairly shite video, if we're honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 They released that video ages ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL7777 Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 13 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Article also say they are believed to have had ‘some successes’ in their arbitration on Associated Party Rules, whatever that means … decision in two weeks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 (edited) Wonder if they lost their first case. I guess we’ll never know until the PL handbook changes or released again without change. Edited August 12 by LFEE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Just now, LFEE said: Wonder if they lost their first case. I guess we’ll never know unless the PL handbook changes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Just now, FloydianMag said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRL Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 They’ll probably say they were allowed previously but they’re being blocked off now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 How on earth can you allow a case to go ahead - whose outcomes either way, will affect every other club massively - and not allow any reporting on it, including the fucking judgements until after it's already done and dusted? How the fuck is that allowed? How on earth is it transparent? How on earth are clubs supposed to adjust their entire financial strategies based upon the decisions of a completely closed court? This is a huge deal here, the state of accounting to circumvent all of this bullshit is off the dial and the fuckers running the gaff won't even allow the fucking decisions to be made public let alone the evidence and rationale behind it all. The whole thing is utterly fucked but the PL are the absolute worst man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 Premier league clubs agreed to it. If they wanted it public they could setup a vote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 No idea if that's correct or not, I'll take your word for it But I find it incredible that the other 19 clubs who'll be directly impacted immediately by the result of the case don't even want the decision of the case to be made public. That's fucking absurd to me. Hiding the details of the case I can kind of understand but waiting until it's all over and not even announcing the result of it?? Fuck - that's some shady shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 (edited) 53 minutes ago, midds said: How on earth can you allow a case to go ahead - whose outcomes either way, will affect every other club massively - and not allow any reporting on it, including the fucking judgements until after it's already done and dusted? How the fuck is that allowed? How on earth is it transparent? How on earth are clubs supposed to adjust their entire financial strategies based upon the decisions of a completely closed court? This is a huge deal here, the state of accounting to circumvent all of this bullshit is off the dial and the fuckers running the gaff won't even allow the fucking decisions to be made public let alone the evidence and rationale behind it all. The whole thing is utterly fucked but the PL are the absolute worst man It’s why we didn’t want arbitration for the takeover and threatened a CAT case which would’ve let us spill the dirt on them all. Edited August 12 by LFEE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 54 minutes ago, midds said: No idea if that's correct or not, I'll take your word for it But I find it incredible that the other 19 clubs who'll be directly impacted immediately by the result of the case don't even want the decision of the case to be made public. That's fucking absurd to me. Hiding the details of the case I can kind of understand but waiting until it's all over and not even announcing the result of it?? Fuck - that's some shady shit Man City and the PL jointly appealed to the Court of Appeal against the High Court decision to publish the judgment of Man City's High Court appeal over them being required to disclose documents by the PL. It's probably generally in clubs' interests to keep disputes private. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted August 13 Share Posted August 13 6 hours ago, Jackie Broon said: Man City and the PL jointly appealed to the Court of Appeal against the High Court decision to publish the judgment of Man City's High Court appeal over them being required to disclose documents by the PL. It's probably generally in clubs' interests to keep disputes private. Why ? Unless they have something to hide. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted August 13 Share Posted August 13 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Ben said: Why ? Unless they have something to hide. Because they generally won't want to have their disputes in public. As said above, it's entirely within the power of the 20 clubs to have a vote to make the arbitration process public. We lobbied for that during the takeover arbitration and clearly didn't get support from the other clubs. Edited August 13 by Jackie Broon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now