The Prophet Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 2 minutes ago, The Butcher said: Semi-drunk atm. Can someone explain in 8 pints and two lines terms? We're going to win the lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankpingel Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 I'm sure Merson will clear everything up tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 (edited) Just now, frankpingel said: I'm sure Merson will clear everything up tomorrow. If you've not got access to sky for merse stick talksport on and troy deeney will explain it all Edited February 14 by jack j Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 I thought all along we should have just spent what we want and challenging it in the courts when the PL tried to punish - it was clear all along the rules weren't legal. I really hope this takes the shackles off and PIF go for it now. Enough being 'nice'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 minute ago, Nucasol said: Not really strange. They’re the primary rights holders and firmly in bed with the established order. It’ll be killing them that their golden goose has now got bird flu. Have the EPL not already said that they are going to fuck Sky over with their own TV deal for £10 a month for every game ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 minute ago, jack j said: If you've not got access to sky for merse stick talksport on and troy deeney will explain it all Shouting out the window of the Sunshine Bus? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, frankpingel said: I'm sure Merson will clear everything up tomorrow. He’ll definitely clear up the butchers lines. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair Pundit Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 We've been fucked over by the powers that be so many times, blocked at every opportunity, hamstrung and swindled over signings ever since the takeover, that I can't even get excited anymore without thinking there's going to be another door ready to be slammed in our faces just around the corner... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonAbroad Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Confused by the talk of the Minteh and Anderson sales and that PSR is crashing down. Isn't this solely about the APT sponsorship rules which means we would still have had to comply with the 105m PSR rule? There's an argument that if we had been allowed the higher sponsorships then we would have easily met PSR, but I can't see anything that suggests PSR is going to change as a result of this. Have I completely missed something 😅. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 hour ago, FloydianMag said: https://www.thetimes.com/article/42e21a97-9bf6-48b6-a861-9afdc8b7c078?shareToken=84a28f1db90f539e610c33f6e4a984a1 Martyn Samuels Dislike Samuels, but that is a fantastic article. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 32 minutes ago, Hudson said: Not true, we will be suing the prem for lost revenue on the difference between what we where allowed to sign it at. Say Noon wanted to pay us £100m but the prem said we could only take £60m. We sue the prem for the lost revenue of £40m. And then agree a new deal of ????? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 9 minutes ago, ToonAbroad said: Confused by the talk of the Minteh and Anderson sales and that PSR is crashing down. Isn't this solely about the APT sponsorship rules which means we would still have had to comply with the 105m PSR rule? There's an argument that if we had been allowed the higher sponsorships then we would have easily met PSR, but I can't see anything that suggests PSR is going to change as a result of this. Have I completely missed something 😅. Yes and know, you've made the point but missed it's relevance, we had to sell to meet PSR but we were only on danger of breaching PSR as a result of our income potential being strangled by APT. So if APT wasn't in place we would not have needed to sell to comply and we'd still have Anderson with Minteh on loan in Germany Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 4 minutes ago, madras said: And then agree a new deal of ????? We'd have to go at least £100m to prove the point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 hour ago, Shearergol said: Hope we have our own evidence of blocked deals. Can’t help but feel we’ve been playing by the rules though Should take the cunts back to court for blocking the takeover again. We'd be challenging for the league without these rules and the delay in takeover. We'd also have a right winger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaztoon Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 13 minutes ago, Unbelievable said: Dislike Samuels, but that is a fantastic article. They all knew it was corrupt as feck but said nothing.. now the morals come out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 9 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Without anything else, the November rule that owners loaning money at no interest is not backdated will be found illegal. Premier League are totally fucked Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 14 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Another PL / ESL stooge who’ll be getting fed by his Masters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 43 minutes ago, Hudson said: Not true, we will be suing the prem for lost revenue on the difference between what we where allowed to sign it at. Say Noon wanted to pay us £100m but the prem said we could only take £60m. We sue the prem for the lost revenue of £40m. Don't think this is necessarily correct. We could still take the 100m deal I believe, just only 60m could count towards PSR, which if we did we could now indeed claim the 40m should have counted towards PSR. Would be interesting to know what deals were knocked back altogether or (as you suggest) lowered though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 20 minutes ago, The Prophet said: #wait Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 31 minutes ago, frankpingel said: I'm sure Merson will clear everything up tomorrow. what his sick and drool? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 #wait is the new #cans! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 22 minutes ago, The Prophet said: What is David Peel replying to for those without Twitter? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Literally nothing has changed from what we knew. Some of the APT rules were judged to be against UK law - and the PL was going to redraft the offending articles. Their redrafts may also fall foul of it. The PL cocked up with their hastily rewritten rules. That doesn’t mean the end of the rules. I’d be surprised if we have any benefit gained between 21-24. The ones who should be troubled are those who had director debts not accumulating interest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, Fak said: What is David Peel replying to for those without Twitter? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now